Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
For the past six years, U.S. truckload shippers have defied the numerous forecasts of soaring contract freight rates to keep control of the pricing reins. However, given the cross-currents buffeting the truckload market, few will be shocked if the contract rate segment—which lags the "spot," or non-contract market, by 3 to 6 months—catches up big time by next spring, if not sooner.
That's because what lies ahead—namely the Dec. 18 deadline for all post-2000 fleets to be equipped with electronic logging devices (ELDs) in their cabs—will collide with what has already occurred—specifically, last April's implementation of safe-transport provisions of federal food-safety rules—to create what some observers have called the tightest cycle for truckload capacity since an 18-month period that began in mid-2003. Then, the U.S. economy grew strongly as it emerged from the 2000-02 recession and the uncertainty surrounding the Iraq war, while capacity was subsequently hit by the 2004 implementation of the federal government's driver hours-of-service rules.
So far this year, most of the action has been in the spot market. There, demand and pricing have remained firm into August and have held up through periods of seasonal weakness, such as in July, when spot-market activity typically falls off. The number of available loads rose 2 percent in the last week of July, according to DAT Solutions, a load board provider that closely tracks the spot market. In the dry van segment, where most truck freight moves, the top 100 lanes set all-time volume records during the week, DAT said. In June, total loads were up a remarkable 90 percent from June 2016 levels, DAT said.
The spot market's surge has prompted carriers to move more of their fleets away from contract hauls, much to the chagrin of shippers and brokers, which find themselves increasingly going deeper down their routing guides to find a carrier that will haul under contract. One broker said he's heard first-hand loud complaints from large shippers about their carriers abandoning them in favor of spot-market lucre.
IVE ME LOGS AND FOOD
What's causing this? There has been exhaustive speculation surrounding the projected capacity decline triggered by the ELD implementation deadline. By several estimates, about half of all trucks—overwhelmingly run by owner-operators—are not in compliance with the ELD mandate. In a recent presentation, Cherry Hill, N.J.-based Tucker Company Worldwide Inc., a large freight broker, said the mandate will reduce total truck miles by 10 to 20 percent, as drivers who in the past may have fudged paper logs to operate longer-than-allowed hours either cut back their miles or park their rigs altogether.
With a 10-percent mileage cut at a 50-percent non-compliance rate, about 5 percent of truck capacity would disappear, according to Tucker's projections. At a 20-percent mileage cut, the capacity evaporation rate rises to 10 percent, it forecast. Such a capacity crunch would be "historic," said Tucker, noting capacity was still relatively abundant when the economy rebounded in the third quarter of 2003, only to tighten when the hours-of-service rules went into effect in 2004.
The expected impact of the ELD mandate will be amplified by the requirement, which took effect in April, that shippers and brokers comply with the safe-transportation language embedded in the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), a landmark law regulating all aspects of the farm-to-table supply chain. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which wrote the rules, said the transport language didn't reinvent the regulatory wheel, and merely codifies the practices supply chain participants already had in place. Still, that hasn't kept rates from rising, and capacity from shrinking, for many shippers and brokers.
Many owner-operators don't possess the advanced level of technology required to meet rules governing the transport of the types of temperature-controlled cargo covered by the rules, Tucker said. In addition, major food shippers have been "stealing others' capacity" by paying higher rates or promising increased and consistent volumes, leaving fewer trucks for everyone else, it added.
The spot market for refrigerated loads reflects the phenomenon. Starting in mid-spring, the load-to-truck ratio for reefer equipment increased to 10 loads available for each truck, from 6 loads in 2016, according to DAT data cited by Tucker.
CONTRACT WEAKNESS
Despite all this, contract pricing remains tepid. A monthly index published by consultancy FTR that measures shipper conditions improved just moderately in May, the most recent month for which data was available. The May index indicated that contract rates were going nowhere fast and that the outlook was still favorable for shippers, FTR said. Jonathan Starks, the company's COO, said in a statement that the index reflected the perception that the economy hasn't received the boost from the Trump administration that many were hoping for. "We are back at the status quo, with moderate growth in both the overall economy and truck freight," he said in a statement last week.
However, in a subsequent e-mail, Starks said contract rates are poised to climb, and the only question is when. "We had expected earlier movement ... but we are now at the point where contract markets will start to show movement," he said. One tip-off is that the publicly traded truckload carriers were beating analysts' second-quarter estimates, despite confirming that rates remained subdued, he said.
Jeffrey G. Tucker, Tucker's CEO, forecast that the combination of the ELD and FSMA mandates will cause contract rates to spring forth with a vengeance not seen in more than a decade. Truckload contracts are dodgy things: They don't commit carriers to provide capacity, but they don't force carriers to abide by negotiated rates either. Contract rates can change mid-contract, and Tucker said that many will do just that during the upcoming cycle. What's more, because overall capacity is tighter today than it was in 2003-04, the impact on rates will be more extreme than in 2004, which he called a "brutal" year for shippers.
Larger carriers that didn't chase the spot market and stood by their shippers will be in high cotton as the pendulum swings, according to Tucker. They will "have the luxury to pick and choose the best lanes, maximizing their ROI systemwide," he said in an e-mail. Addressing those carriers, he said: "Everyone will have you on speed dial, you'll be overbooked every day, and you'll be able to call your shots like Babe Ruth."
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.