Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Most shippers associate Averitt Express Inc. with its less-than-truckload (LTL) business that serves customers in 13 states in the Sunbelt, the Carolinas, and the Mid-Atlantic. Or with its role in "The Reliance Network," a group of seven regional LTL carriers that pool their resources to provide single-line deliveries across the U.S. and Canada.
Fishers Finery doesn't happen to be one of those shippers. In fact, the New London, Conn.-based manufacturer and online retailer of ecologically friendly clothing, jewelry, bedding, and lifestyle items doesn't use Averitt's trucks for its customer deliveries. Yet for the rest of its products' journey from eight overseas factories—seven in China and one in Italy—to customers across the U.S., Averitt has become indispensable.
At the heart of Averitt's value proposition is a service that few truckers offer: warehouse space embedded in its terminals. Though carriers sometimes provide warehousing and DC capacity at locations apart from their terminals, it is unusual to carve out warehouse space within them. At Averitt, this means using all available space—which will include its trailers—should capacity inside its 85 terminals get tight, according to Phil Pierce, executive vice president, sales and marketing for the privately held Cookeville, Tenn.-based company. Capacity in each terminal will vary, Pierce said.
Shippers are not required to sign a contract to use the common warehouse space. However, Averitt requires a legal time commitment to utilize its seven contract warehouses, which are separate from the in-terminal locations, Pierce said. Fishers uses Averitt's common warehouse space.
Carrier warehouses like this Averitt facility can be a way for smaller importers to level the playing field.
For Fishers, a four-year-old company growing at a 100-percent annualized rate but still watching every dollar that goes out the door, the Averitt service has been a solid fit, according to Craig Barnell, Fishers' co-founder. E-tailer Amazon.com Inc.'s "Fulfillment by Amazon" (FBA) service, which Fishers uses exclusively for its direct-to-customer fulfillment, has warehousing capabilities. However, the warehouse fees are generally uncompetitive, mostly because Amazon's process isn't structured to store goods by case-packs, which is how Fishers wants to receive them for fulfillment. Storing by the case-pack requires a different racking system and operational footprint, and it doesn't mix well with Seattle-based Amazon's standard retail fulfillment process, according to Barnell. Amazon "doesn't want to be a Fishers Finery warehouse," he said.
Furthermore, because Fishers' inventory turns four times a year, the merchandise would need to be warehoused at Amazon's centers for months at a time. Barnell couldn't justify the ongoing cost. "It's a fortune," he said. Using the Averitt service lets the retailer avoid that expense. Barnell estimates that warehousing Fishers' inventory with Averitt costs about one-sixth what it would with Amazon.
FULL-SERVICE PROVIDER
To understand Averitt's role in Fishers' supply chain, it helps to know something about the retailer's distribution operation, which supports about 2,000 stock-keeping units (SKUs). About 80 percent of Fishers' U.S. imports enter in less-than-containerload (LCL) service through the Port of Long Beach. The remaining 20 percent is flown to DHL Express's U.S. air hub outside of Cincinnati. Averitt is Fishers' exclusive freight forwarder and customs broker for all shipments, managing the process from the purchase order to delivery to the carrier's warehouses.
Once the goods enter the U.S., they are either drayed by a third-party trucker to an Averitt terminal in Hawthorne, Calif., about 15 miles south of Los Angeles, or move via intermodal service to Averitt's main customs clearance facility in Memphis, Tenn., where, once processed, they are trucked by Averitt to its terminal in Erlanger, Ky., just outside Cincinnati.
At the Hawthorne and Erlanger facilities, both of which are located near Amazon fulfillment centers, Averitt holds Fishers' goods until a customer order is received. Working with Amazon's IT systems, Fishers chooses either an LTL carrier or UPS Inc.'s ground-delivery service to pick up at the Averitt warehouses and deliver to the Amazon facility. Fishers has access to ultra-low less-than-truckload (LTL) rates negotiated by Amazon through the e-tailer's "Seller Central" service. (Averitt, which is not a preferred Amazon carrier, does not participate.) Averitt then handles the picking, packaging, labeling, and reconciliation, and prepares the shipment for carrier pickup. Upon arriving at an Amazon facility, the goods are distributed through the FBA service.
Fishers' products reside in Amazon's centers only as long as it takes to move them out the door, Barnell said. Averitt has already done the heavy lifting to ensure that the stays with Amazon are as brief as possible, he added.
Averitt provides Fishers with one through bill of lading, one consolidated invoice, and one point of contact with a dedicated account manager, according to Barnell. What's more, Fishers doesn't need to hire an in-house logistics practitioner to manage the process, Barnell said.
Barnell had his pick of hundreds of freight forwarders and customs brokers, as well as an abundance of customer fulfillment centers that perform pick and pack services. However, none of the centers wanted to manage fulfillment requests for Amazon by case-pack quantities. Once Barnell realized that Averitt could provide the inbound support and the warehouse capacity to handle goods the way he wanted, he thought, "Why couldn't they be the DC?"
Fishers could have opted for a lower-cost inbound service provider than Averitt. However, Barnell was unwilling to roll the dice with a less-seasoned partner in the complex and demanding international logistics arena. Besides, the back-end savings on warehousing and LTL, as well as avoiding the payroll drag of hiring an employee to manage logistics, offset the higher front-end costs, he said.
HOW IT ALL STARTED
Averitt expanded into carrier warehousing about five years ago through a long-running delivery relationship with retailing behemoth Wal-Mart Stores Inc. Because Wal-Mart's vendors—who were Averitt's customers—already held their goods at Averitt's terminals, the carrier was able to quickly move them from the warehouse to the truck. This helped Averitt consistently hit Wal-Mart's four-day "must-arrive" requirements.
The model took on more relevance after Bentonville, Ark.-based Wal-Mart compressed its delivery deadlines to one day for perishables and two days for dry goods to meet more demanding e-commerce delivery standards, according to Pierce, the Averitt executive. Through the warehousing model, Averitt successfully adjusted to the tighter windows, Pierce said.
Much was riding on Averitt's performance: Failure to meet Wal-Mart's requirements can result in a chargeback to the shipper, a ding to the shipper's compliance score, or both.
The success with Wal-Mart's vendors led Averitt to push out the solution to the broader retail market, especially with e-commerce shippers that supply to marketplaces like Amazon and independent merchants selling through their own websites, Pierce said.
The Averitt executive said the service is not designed for businesses seeking traditional long-term storage capabilities. "We are not in the storage business," he said. "But if a company is looking to use our warehousing as a way to accelerate its forward supply chain, that's where we can help."
According to Barnell, there are millions of e-merchants just like Fishers: smaller, fast-growing concerns looking to connect overseas producers with U.S. consumers, and trying to level the playing field through cost-effective services like carrier warehousing. For them, the Averitt model may be worth exploring, he said. "Averitt has been a godsend for us," he said.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."