Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Nowhere is it written that all e-commerce deliveries must consist of symmetrical four-pound parcels. In fact, the focus of the online fulfillment saga's next chapter could be on items that don't look anything like what has come before.
Small, lightweight shipments handled through traditional conveyance systems have dominated e-commerce's early days. But the broadening of online inventories now gives consumers and businesses access to goods of all shapes, weights, and sizes. These include so-called large-format items that weigh more than 150 pounds and usually require two people to deliver and perhaps install, as well as relatively light but bulky products that are incompatible with conveyors. These could be skis, mattresses, treadmills, or desks. Or they could be furniture items ordered on Seattle-based Amazon.com Inc., the world's largest e-tailer, which recently announced it would enter the space.
U.S. online sales of nonconveyable goods have hit $30 billion, equal to about 10 percent of total e-commerce sales, according to Omaha, Neb.-based truckload and logistics company Werner Enterprises Inc., which in May launched a service to deliver such items the "last" mile to residences from stores, factories, or DCs. For-hire last-mile deliveries of heavy goods ordered online have grown at a nearly 9-percent compound annual rate since 2012 and are now a $7.6 billion-a-year business, said consultancy SJ Consulting.
E-commerce rewrote the rules for parcel carriers, which had to adjust to business-to-consumer (B2C) deliveries overtaking their traditional business-to-business (B2B) market. The continued growth of large-format orders will rewrite the rules yet again, but this time for multiple types of carriers. Parcel service providers are expanding their physical networks in part to accommodate orders that can't be handled via conveyor. FedEx Ground, the ground parcel unit that handles the bulk of e-commerce deliveries for its parent, Memphis, Tenn.-based FedEx Corp., has added 10 million square feet of capacity in the past 18 months, with four major U.S. hubs and 19 automated stations. Meanwhile, less-than-truckload (LTL) carriers with minimal exposure to residences and with drivers accustomed to serving docks will now be expected to go into a home and work directly with customers. And truckload carriers, the biggest collective players in U.S. shipping, will dive in as e-commerce growth provides attractive levels of shipment density centered around major markets.
Kevin P. Knight, chief executive officer of Phoenix-based Knight Transportation, which will become the nation's biggest truckload carrier should its $6 billion merger with hometown rival Swift Transportation Co. LLC win shareholder approval, reportedly said on a recent analyst call that e-commerce volume growth "has allowed truckload to be in the game, whereas initially when it wasn't so concentrated or there wasn't the volume, you had no choice but to rely on parcel or even LTL."
CAPACITY ALLOCATION CHALLENGES
Given the dynamic nature of omnichannel fulfillment, where orders can be pulled from anywhere, there will be increasing pressure to execute proper load planning so carrier capacity can be effectively allocated. "The challenge for us will be getting good capacity in all the right places," said Craig Stoffel, Werner's vice president of global logistics. Werner's fleet will focus on the linehaul part of the move—known as the "middle mile"—before tendering the goods to a network of last-mile delivery providers. Stoffel said the company has assembled a network of 200 locations to support the initiative.
Demands by consumers and businesses for faster delivery will require greater focus on cross-docking, where goods dropped off at a dock are quickly reloaded onto another vehicle without the product's entering a warehouse or DC. XPO Logistics Inc., the Greenwich, Conn.-based transportation and logistics service provider that operates what it says is the industry's largest last-mile network with 12 million deliveries a year, leverages its cross-dock function to examine products and make any needed modifications, said Will O'Shea, senior vice president, sales solutions, for the company's Last Mile unit.
XPO is testing the integration of its contract logistics, LTL, and last-mile operations and is working to compress delivery times for larger items to one to two days from the current five- to six-day window. XPO is a top player in all three segments, which O'Shea said gives it a leg up in the last-mile space compared with rivals that are just starting out. XPO has said it hopes to roll out the service by year's end.
The cross-dock model could be expanded on a collaborative basis, with goods being brought in on behalf of multiple retailers and then placed on so-called straight trucks, vehicles with standard dimensions and "lift-gate" devices that raise and lower items between ground level and the level of the vehicle's bed. "Why would each one of those [retailers] have its own discrete method of final mile?" asked Alex Stark, senior vice president, marketing for Kane Is Able Inc., a Scranton, Pa.-based LTL carrier and third-party logistics service provider (3PL). "They should pool their sales and leverage an enabler to execute to the consumer."
Stark also suggested that truckload and LTL carriers consider tapping into the pool of straight trucks controlled by rental outfits such as U-Haul that might otherwise sit unused. "What if truckload and LTL carriers contracted out with those companies to provide last-mile service within a geographic region?" he said. "That would be an excellent example of collaboration and shouldn't cannibalize the driver fleet since most straight trucks do not require a [commercial driver's license] to operate."
Stoffel of Werner expects that truckload carriers will partner up with LTL carriers because it would not be cost-effective to utilize a whole truck to transport, say, two or three treadmills to residences, whereas an LTL carrier commingling freight for multiple customers can afford to do that. "Truckload service providers will need strong LTL partnerships" to remain viable over the long haul, he said.
The growth of last-mile services, and the accompanying proliferation of entrants, could result in provider convergence the likes of which the transportation and logistics industry has rarely seen. "They're all merging," said Paul Johnson, vice president of global solutions and consulting for Descartes Systems Group Inc., a Waterloo, Ontario-based IT company, referring to the expected integration of services. The ability of providers to be flexible and reconfigure networks almost on the fly will be critical to success, Johnson said.
SUPERIOR TECHNOLOGY
To be sufficiently agile to support multiple workflows, providers will also need top-notch technology. A company like XPO, for example, offers visibility to the consumer from the point of purchase to proof of delivery, according to O'Shea. It also gives its contract drivers (it relies on about 5,000 independent contractors) visibility of the product down to the item level, O'Shea said. This means, among other things, that drivers can be guided to address specific issues related to product installation either while at the home or before arrival.
By contrast, truckload carriers have barely scratched the surface on track-and-trace technology because that hasn't been a priority. Johnson of Descartes said the speed and proficiency by which truckload and LTL drivers master mobile technology will be another key factor in making last-mile work.
Above all else, according to O'Shea, those getting into the market must adapt to a new world. Not only are drivers entering a customer's most private environment, but they are usually delivering a high-cost product that, in many cases, must also be assembled. Unlike "traditional" e-commerce shipments, which can be returned with relatively little inconvenience to the customer and cost to the retailer, a late delivery of a large-format item, damage to the item during delivery, improper installation, or just plain buyer's remorse ratchets up the cost to the retailer as well as the provider. If any of those scenarios occurs, the driver must then go into "save the sale" mode, according to Stoffel of Werner.
"It's a very different business when you are interacting with the customer in their home," said O'Shea, who has been doing last-mile for years. "For drivers, it's not what they're used to. They bump docks."
A version of this article appears in our July 2017 print edition under the title "Going heavy to the home."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."