Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
The peak holiday shopping season is a make-or-break period for retailers, as consumers rush to stores and websites with gift lists in hand. Many companies make the bulk of their annual revenue in that hectic three- to four-week period from the day after Thanksgiving to Dec. 23, so the stakes are high for retailers, their carriers, and their logistics service providers (LSPs).
Botched execution can dent a company's profit margin as well as its reputation. Atlanta-based transport and logistics giant UPS Inc. saw that happen in 2013 when the carrier drew sharp criticism for significant delivery delays after underestimating the last-minute surge in e-commerce orders that hit its network in the final days of the peak season. The company spent heavily to avoid that scenario in following years but watched its profit margins shrink in the 2016 peak as it struggled to handle a record 712 million packages.
So how do companies handle traffic surges without blowing their budgets for the rest of the year? DC Velocity asked some logistics service providers to share lessons learned from their experiences in 2016 and tell us what they would do differently in 2017.
GET CREATIVE WITH LABOR
A growing challenge for any logistics provider is hiring and training the temporary employees it needs to ramp up operations during peak season. "It has become more and more challenging to get access to qualified material handling labor, and the wages required to keep these workers have increased," said Todd Everett, president and CEO of Newgistics, an Austin, Texas-based provider of e-commerce services for retailers. "You're more than doubling the workforce for a very short period of time."
That growing worker shortage has led Newgistics to seek out new sources of labor, offer hiring incentives, and launch engineering studies to find ways to reduce the labor required to handle the swelling volume of e-commerce orders. The company is also looking for ways to use its warehouse and labor management software to simplify material handling tasks in the DC, streamline training for warehouse jobs, and quickly move workers to new tasks in response to changes in demand.
"You have to make sure you're not training everyone to do everything," Everett said. "So we use task-specific training. We bring people in and train five of them to do receiving, five to do packing, five to do shipping, and five to do basic prep and dock cleanup or whatever's needed."
The increasingly tight labor supply means warehouse managers often find they are competing against each other for the same people, said Spencer Moore, executive vice president of sales for Speed Commerce, a Richardson, Texas-based provider of fulfillment solutions.
To land the best employees, warehouses are offering signing bonuses and boosting pay by two or three dollars per hour, Moore said. Across the industry, DCs have started peak season hiring earlier in the year and are offering incentives like free lunches or raffling off a television set. Some are even busing in workers from neighboring cities while feeding them breakfast and dinner during the commute, he said.
KEEP AN EYE ON THE FORECAST
Whether an LSP plans to cope with the surge by hiring more labor, renting additional warehouse space, or reserving extra trailers, an accurate business forecast is critical to staying profitable during peak season, said Moore. "Every company does forecasting a different way. We require a forecast every month, with updates every week," Moore said. "[Retailers] need to treat us like we're an extension of their own business, which we are."
Forecasts are a critical part of service contracts, which often include service-level agreements (SLAs), such as a pledge to ship all orders by 2 p.m. the same day they're received, he said. By collaborating, retailers and fulfillment centers can react to changes and make sure products reach consumers on time.
When retailers and 3PLs discuss those forecasts, they should review near-term key performance indicators (KPIs) and long-term business outlooks, as well as discuss the impact of business initiatives such as product launches, store openings, or sales.
For example, if a retailer forecasts in late April that it will have 30,000 orders in May, but its marketing department then decides to run a 30-percent-off sale, the retailer should make sure the fulfillment center knows about the change. "[Retailers] may not be able to fix mistakes in forecasting, but they can relax the SLA. After all, they would have the same problem if they ran their own facility," Moore said.
As for when retailers should bring partners into the planning process, the earlier the better, said Brené Hudspeth, vice president of transportation management at Transplace, a Dallas-based third-party logistics service provider.
Between the rise of omnichannel commerce and the shift from brick-and-mortar stores to e-commerce sites, consumer demand can change overnight, making forecasts irrelevant. "Our clients allow us to come into their planning process," Hudspeth said. "Instead of just being sent purchase orders or store delivery data for the next week, we need to be in the planning process for the next two, four, six, or eight weeks."
To minimize the need to hire additional carriers at the last minute, Transplace uses computer analytics to run different scenarios with each partner, Hudspeth said. Using its transportation management system (TMS), the company models the impact of proposed changes to help find the optimal balance between cost and service. For example, the modeling would allow clients to see what would happen if they spread shipments over five or six weeks instead of two, staged certain inventory in transit, used cross-docks to handle spikes in demand, or changed routes to run through Charlotte or Orlando instead of Atlanta.
STAY FLEXIBLE
That willingness to update forecasts and make changes is crucial in an era when e-commerce patterns are changing the market faster than ever before, said Gary Colangelo, vice president of client services for Spend Management Experts (SME), an Atlanta-based financial supply chain consultancy.
"Peak season is always the elephant in the room, for both shippers and carriers," Colangelo said. "They try to prepare for it—everyone's investing in their networks—but the problem is the lack of historical data for e-commerce. You're shooting from the hip because the market is changing so rapidly."
Some companies deal with demand fluctuations by renting flexible warehousing space or deploying pop-up hubs to handle overflow volume, or by adding days of service, like Saturday and Sunday deliveries, to achieve better asset utilization, he said. But the best approach to managing change is to work closely with the small number of clients who drive the bulk of the holiday surge to avoid last-minute surprises, Colangelo said.
LSPs also have to be mindful about the mix of companies that will share space in the facility, adds Newgistics' Everett. One of the key challenges of running a multi-tenant e-commerce fulfillment organization is balancing the workload, he explained. "In an ideal world, you'd have one tenant with a peak in January, one in February, and one in March, but that's not how it works," Everett said. "Most of them align to the traditional retail peak."
To avoid a full-on peak season meltdown, LSPs may have to be selective about the customers they take on. "All business is not good business," Everett said. "You've got to be smart about which tenants you sign up and what operations you're going to need throughout the year. It won't work if 100 percent of your customers have peaks in the same week."
Whatever strategy a company may choose to survive peak season, industry experts agree that the only constant is change. Shipping patterns in the retail market are changing quickly in the era of online shopping and omnichannel fulfillment.
Improving warehouse hiring strategies or fine-tuning sales forecasts can cushion the blow. But in the end, experts say, the best approach is a close partnership between client and service provider.
Whatever the date on the calendar, it is never too early to start preparing for the next peak. "Peak season planning starts right after the last peak ends," SME's Colangelo says. "Success comes down to the timing of when you begin that forecasting and your sense of urgency in getting it right."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."