It's not just for those in the C-suite. Each and every one of us can benefit from learning and applying leadership behaviors in our work lives and in life in general.
Art van Bodegraven was, among other roles, chief design officer for the DES Leadership Academy. He passed away on June 18, 2017. He will be greatly missed.
With all the palaver about leadership—behaviors, attributes, successes—it is all too easy to imagine that the subject is all about what it takes to be the next CEO, the paladin who rides a white horse at the head of a conquering army. Well, maybe. We do need some CEOs.
We also need CFOs (chief financial officers), CAOs (chief administrative officers), COOs (chief operating officers), CIOs (chief information officers), and CSCOs (chief supply chain officers). But it does seem that not nearly all of these exalted beings have fully internalized the tenets of 21st century leadership.
Everyone needs basic leadership lessons to help them become better managers and take organizations to greater heights, with better—and sustainable—people performance. But CFOs seem to get lost in the numbers, forsaking all other areas of focus. CAOs tend to get bogged down in processes and rigorous execution to the exclusion of expedient deviations and of the incorporation of human concerns in almighty policies.
COOs can jump the tracks of leadership behavior due to a singular focus on getting things done—now! CIOs may struggle with integrating human-level activities, preferences, biases, and imprinted behaviors in new or revised systems, taking refuge in the dispassionate technology that gallops into our previously quiet lives. And CSCOs, who need the leadership skill set as much as anyone—and are frequently so predisposed—too often have to short circuit doing the right thing the right way in order to meet the cascading imperatives imposed by peers and customers.
WHY?
Some of these tendencies may be explained by the variations in how individuals' brains are hard-wired. Some may be reflections of last-century thinking about management. Still others could result from modeling the behaviors of respected—or feared—bosses.
Whatever, cures are possible, as well as desirable. Contrary to conventional wisdom, leaders are made, not born. No one can inherit genuine leadership ability; it must be learned.
AND THE REST OF US?
News flash! Not all of us aspire to the C-suite. And few of us, even those with corporate ambitions, are anywhere near reaching the seats of power. But we all—each and every one—can benefit from learning and applying leadership skills and behaviors in our work lives and in life in general. Even the future CEO does not overnight become a leader simply because of an elevation in status.
A key to success in reaching authentic leadership status lies in repetition. Much like becoming the next Serena Williams, or Brett Favre, or Yo Yo Ma, it's vital to start early. Then, never let up, never stop, never mail it in, and never falter upon running up against the inevitable obstacles.
EVERYDAY LEADERSHIP
Wherever you are in work, in life, in relationships, in the extracurriculars, it's an integral part of the process to demonstrate and refine leadership behaviors. The process? That's the building and layering that evolves into powerful and acknowledged leadership; the embrace and internalization of the precepts that make an individual stand out in accepted and welcomed positive ways.
Embarking on, and staying on, the leadership course is as important in the mailroom as it is in the C-suite. Perhaps it's even more important there because it is where one learns how to fail and recover, how to be real, and what specific things are honest and consistent with one's mental makeup.
Whether or not one is a leader at work, and irrespective of long-term career aspirations, leadership opportunities surround us. We are short-changing ourselves and leaving those around us poorer if we fail to demonstrate and practice the things that attract followers—and improve results.
Church groups, school and charitable organizations, homeless programs, Girl Scouts/Boy Scouts, disaster relief efforts ... the needs are staggering in scope and number. Sure, they all need pairs of hands and warm bodies to get the work done. But none of that comes remotely close to potential without the organization, vision, and direction that leadership brings. And there's no rule that prohibits leaders from pitching in to execute necessary work—in fact, a leader can either gain or lose credibility by his or her willingness to suffer dirty fingernails.
HOW TOUGH IS THIS, REALLY?
To be honest, it's not a slam-dunk. But it's not Olympic-level, either. Training and learning—and practice—are the basics. The components, all of which can be taught, learned, and mastered, have been covered as well as anywhere in previous BasicTrainingcolumns. They are numerous and demand rigor and discipline, but they are not complicated. Maybe they boil down to effective communications, accountability for performance, clear visions, valuing diversity (both visible and invisible), and treating people like human beings.
In general, we undertrain and undereducate. And our focus tends to be on new systems and new processes. But every associate deserves—for the organization's benefit—to learn how to lead, both in general and in specific areas. Periodic refreshers are also vital to keep the commitment alive, to recognize cosmic changes, and to bring new people into the leaders' tent. We tend to do either a poor or nonexistent job in this arena.
CONSEQUENCES
So what happens when everyday people act like leaders? If you have a custodial role, the best moppers and fixers will clamor to change to your shift. If you have a team, you'll get results, and the best and brightest will politick to get assigned to your team(s), leading to even better results. If you have a department, recruiting and retention will disappear as obstacles to consistent performance. If you head an enterprise, your organization will become a target destination for top performers—and that high performance will continue or even tick up a notch, delighting shareholders, customers, and employees.
Not only is business not a zero sum game, but outcomes can genuinely be win-win-win.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.