"Conexus Indiana," the state's private-public economic development partnership, has thrived mainly because the private sector leads and the public sector follows, says David Holt, a Conexus vice president and head of its logistics initiative.
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
In August 2010, this magazine wrote about the launch of a program called "Conexus Indiana," which officials at the time called the first statewide initiative to promote logistics opportunities and to integrate logistics with four other economic disciplines, notably workforce development. The latter connection was critical to job creation in a state that was struggling with a 10.2-percent unemployment rate.
Fast forward nearly seven years. What began with 36 logistics executives identifying ways to combine infrastructure needs, workforce development requirements, and public policy imperatives has mushroomed into a small army of 220. Work that originated on a statewide level has expanded into Indiana's regions and counties, with six regional logistics councils. But one thing has remained the same: The state that pioneered the use of logistics to attract business investment and push economic growth is still the only state doing it, according to David Holt, who has headed Conexus' logistics council from the start. Its success, according to Holt, is based on the idea that the private sector leads and the public sector holds back until it is appropriate to follow.
Holt recently spoke with Mark B. Solomon, DCV's executive editor-news, about Conexus' evolution, why other states haven't copied its approach, and how the group communicates the strengths of Indiana's assets—such as having more "pass-through" interstate surface arteries and being closer to the U.S. population's mid-point than any other state.
Q: How did Conexus Indiana get started?
A: We were founded by the Central Indiana Corporate Partnership, which had five economic clusters, one of them being logistics. We were seeded with a $3 million grant from the (Eli) Lilly Endowment. That was used for workforce development and allowed us to begin communicating with logistics executives about the role they could play in helping the state support their companies. I was brought in with a background in transportation and workforce development. I had also worked at the White House and in Congress, so I understood the nuances of the political process and its impact on industry.
In 2008, we created an educational curriculum of logistics and advanced manufacturing, and began connecting with schools to build interest and participation. We divided Indiana into three regions—North, Central, and South—and we partnered with high-level logistics executives around the state. We went to market in 2010 with a statewide logistics plan that basically identified all logistics needs for the next 30 years.
Q: Where is the organization today?
A: The executives we are involved with have always been volunteers, and we have far more of them today. Our expanded roster was vital in helping us begin the next major phase of our work, which was to help coordinate projects on a local level. The six regional logistics councils drafted infrastructure plans that identified road needs of all 92 counties. We delivered the plan to INDOT (the Indiana Department of Transportation), which it funneled to our General Assembly. The General Assembly is now debating mechanisms to fund about $2 billion per year in road infrastructure, maintenance, and new capacity projects.
We have also expanded our efforts in workforce development, especially when it comes to working with universities. We have worked to get high school students and students attending (two-year) junior colleges interested in the field. We have endorsed logistics curriculums at Ball State University and the University of Evansville. We send executives to business schools to talk to students about getting logistics degrees. We will then bus interested students to logistics companies so they can get a feel for the work at these facilities.
Q: You played a role in helping reroute westbound intermodal traffic from the Chicago area to Indiana, where it could be moved via rail faster and more cheaply to the Port of Prince Rupert in Vancouver, B.C. You also helped scotch a state tax rule that would have discouraged companies from relocating to Indiana. Yet you consider Conexus' mission, and the council's role in it, to be that of a catalyst rather than an initiator. How does that square with those two achievements?
A: Those efforts came from the private sector. Conexus is more of a connecting point. We come up with ideas, and the private sector drives the work. We connect the ideas to the right people. If you build, design, and make available the assets so our economic developers can support our companies, then the state can attract new companies because we have what they need. For example, when a transport funding bill was up for debate, the chairman of the House transportation committee asked Conexus to identify people to testify. We asked a real estate developer, who testified about what would be needed to attract warehouse and distribution center development to the state.
We don't have any hard data to illustrate how our work has generated economic benefits. Any data would come from the Indiana Economic Development Corp. (IEDC), which does the deals. Sometimes IEDC will bring us in, but most deals have confidentiality agreements, and we are not privy to the information in them.
Q: Why haven't other states replicated your efforts?
A: I've visited a number of states, and they ask me how we've done it. I tell them that our state made the decision to let the private sector lead and that it would follow up with the necessary implementation that only government can do. States have this idea that economic development needs to run through the government. But that throws up a roadblock. The private sector has a skeptical view of government's lead role. As a result, it will be reluctant to share information. Our experience has been that when the private sector leads, it will be more willing to share ideas, resources, and best practices. In our state, it comes down to the private sector getting together and saying with a collective voice, "This is what we need to make it happen."
That said, we've had tremendous backing during the past seven years from governors Mitch Daniels and (current Vice President) Mike Pence. Both administrations understood the value of Indiana's location on the map and were extraordinarily engaged in making logistics work for the state's economy and its people.
Q: So what is your message to other states?
A: That the private sector, when brought together, can solve a lot of problems. It does take leadership to bring them together, and that's where an organization like Conexus, which has long experience working with the public and private sectors, can be a valuable asset. We have people who can connect with executives, who understand the industries they work in, and who can demonstrate how logistics activities benefit their companies and the state. The key is getting the private sector's commitment. If they grasp the benefits for their company, you will get great engagement.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."