Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
It's a rare retailer these days that relies on a single channel to generate sales. By now, many, if not most, have embraced the omnichannel model, selling everything from groceries to consumer goods to apparel via brick-and-mortar stores, websites, and catalogs and call centers. But in the rush to meet customer demand for swift delivery, some retailers forget about their own bottom lines.
"People are shooting themselves in the foot because they're so eager to sell the product. They think they have to keep up with Amazon to the point where they erode their profit," said Zach Zalowitz, practice lead for omnichannel supply chain at the Boulder, Colo., consulting firm SCApath LLC.
Many retailers like the idea of fulfilling online orders from their brick-and-mortar stores but are dismayed to find the practice can be very expensive. "The second you start fulfilling from more than one store for the same order, your profitability is shot, because there are twice as many hands touching it, twice as many boxes to pack, twice as many internal invoices to track," Zalowitz said.
While customers may love it, there's no denying that omnichannel is expensive. Whether a retailer is mailing online orders from retail storefronts, arranging to have orders drop-shipped directly from suppliers, or holding online orders in stores for pickup, those services cost money to provide. Converting a conventional retail operation to an omnichannel one can require investments in new software or material handling equipment, corporate realignment, specialized consultants, changes in transportation routes, DC redesigns, and retraining for store staff.
The pain is real: Many retailers are seeking to offset their rising fulfillment costs by raising prices elsewhere in their operations, according to a recent survey of retail and consumer goods CEOs conducted by PwC on behalf of JDA Software. As for specifics, the PwC study, CEO Viewpoint 2016: The Journey to Profitable Omni-Channel Commerce, found that commonly used strategies included raising the minimum order value for free home delivery, raising the minimum order value for free click-and-collect orders, raising product prices, increasing the cost of home delivery, charging for click-and-collect orders, differentially charging based on customer profile, and charging for returns.
Those strategies can help cap the expense of fulfillment, but some experts say there's a risk inherent in shifting costs to fickle consumers. Another approach for keeping omnichannel operations affordable is to seek out and leverage the hidden benefits and eliminate inefficiencies. Here are three approaches for squeezing the most from your investment in omnichannel operations.
1. SEGMENT YOUR INVENTORY
One way to keep a lid on spiraling fulfillment costs is to avoid omnichannel entirely ... for certain products, that is. Retailers that keep a close eye on their costs know that there are some items that can never be profitably shipped to the consumer from a retail store. By the time a heavy tent or bulky flatscreen TV reaches that store, it has already accrued so much shipping and handling cost that a retailer could never recoup those fees at a reasonable sales price, SCApath's Zalowitz argues.
"Historically with fulfillment in the store, you put the product in the store for a consumer to pull off the shelf and buy it there," he said. "But if you put the product in a DC and then a store, you've moved it twice. Those labor and transportation costs add up. Each time you touch it, it's eroding margin, to the point where it's almost better if you didn't expose it to the store in the first place."
Smart retailers simply exclude those items from their omnichannel operations. Businesses can use distributed order management (DOM) or store inventory management system (SIMS) software to track those accumulated costs on each product, he said. If the software shows an item wouldn't retain its profit margin after being shipped from a store, the retailer could ship it from a more cost-effective location instead, placating the customer by offering him or her a discount or coupon to make up for any delay in delivery.
"I get it that everyone's trying to keep up with two-day shipping from Amazon, but people are a little loose in their logic when they [offer] everything in their inventory to be shipped from a store," Zalowitz said.
2. TIGHTEN UP INTERNAL PROCESSES TO ALLOW MORE TIME FOR DELIVERY
Another way to rein in fulfillment costs is to tighten up internal order fulfillment processes, thus buying more time for shipping. Whisk that order out the DC door and you may be able to send it via low-cost ground transportation instead of premium-priced express service, and still reach the buyer on time.
Destination Maternity Corp. discovered that benefit after it moved into a 406,000-square-foot omnichannel distribution center in Florence, N.J., that feeds its 1,800 retail locations in addition to handling e-commerce orders, wholesale shipments, and returns.
To build the new DC, the maternity apparel designer and retailer had to bite the bullet and invest in equipment such as an automated storage and retrieval system (AS/RS), an outbound unit sorter, a light-directed display put wall, extensive routing and sorting conveyor systems, and wearable radio-frequency identification technology, all directed by a warehouse execution system (WES).
But that investment is paying off in a variety of ways, said Jay Moris, president of Conshohocken, Pa.-based Invata Intralogistics Inc., which designed the system.
For instance, running at full bore, the waveless fulfillment system can process 15,000 pieces per hour regardless of the destination, Moris said. That speed allows Destination Maternity to ship 99 percent of its e-commerce orders within an eight-hour period, accomplishing tasks in one shift that used to require three days, according to Invata.
The accelerated fulfillment process has helped cut shipping costs by giving Destination Maternity more time to reach customers. "If someone wants second-day delivery, UPS may be able to get it there with standard ground," because the shipment gets out the warehouse door so fast, Moris said. "If you're going to wait two or three days to get it out of your facility, you're going to have to use premium express."
3. LEVERAGE YOUR FULFILLMENT PROWESS
Swift fulfillment is a good way to keep customers happy, but it can also generate "likes" and "tweets" that resound far beyond a single sale. In the age of social media, well-executed fulfillment can elicit the kind of customer feedback that's pure gold from a marketing and public relations standpoint.
"Customers want to have immediate visibility on their order-everybody wants that instant gratification-and those end-consumers are giving our clients immediate feedback online," said Tom Patterson, senior vice president of warehouse operations at Saddle Creek Logistics Services, a third-party logistics service provider (3PL) that provides omnichannel fulfillment services for its clients.
Retailers often face a challenge in holding down omnichannel fulfillment costs while still providing the kind of service that generates positive customer feedback on social media. The key is to focus on the customer experience, Patterson said. When it's done right, omnichannel fulfillment can pay off by generating good publicity for the company.
"You don't get a week's leadtime to ship a truckload; you get an hour's leadtime to ship a bracelet," Patterson said. "And by noon the next day, the customer will [let you know] over social media whether you did a good job."
Retailers are paying close attention. During a recent visit to a client in the beverage industry, Patterson noticed that the traditional stack of annual reports in the waiting room had been replaced by a screen showing the continuous chirps of customer chatter about the brand, displayed in a digital flow of Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram updates.
Keeping up with consumer expectations at that pace can be difficult, he admitted. "But it's fun stuff. We wouldn't want to be in any other business."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."