Mitch Mac Donald has more than 30 years of experience in both the newspaper and magazine businesses. He has covered the logistics and supply chain fields since 1988. Twice named one of the Top 10 Business Journalists in the U.S., he has served in a multitude of editorial and publishing roles. The leading force behind the launch of Supply Chain Management Review, he was that brand's founding publisher and editorial director from 1997 to 2000. Additionally, he has served as news editor, chief editor, publisher and editorial director of Logistics Management, as well as publisher of Modern Materials Handling. Mitch is also the president and CEO of Agile Business Media, LLC, the parent company of DC VELOCITY and CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
An estimated 200,000 women can be found behind the wheel of big rigs across the U.S. That might sound like a lot, but it actually represents less than 5 percent of the nearly 4 million-member truck-driver work force. It also points to an opportunity for an industry that's grappled with labor shortages since the 1980s and currently needs tens of thousands of drivers to keep up with demand. It would seem that an obvious part of the solution would be to simply recruit more female drivers.
It could happen, but some things have to change first. That's where Ellen Voie comes in. In 2007, she founded Women In Trucking (WIT), a nonprofit organization that promotes careers in trucking for woman and works to dismantle barriers that keep more women from joining the driver ranks. Today, she is the group's president and CEO.
Voie started WIT based on her own experiences. Although she has never been a truck driver, she has a long tenure in the motor freight industry. Prior to founding WIT, she worked in a variety of roles in the field, most recently serving as manager of retention and recruiting programs at Schneider Inc.
In addition to heading up the nonprofit, Voie is a frequent speaker at industry events and has published numerous articles and two books. Her blog appears on the White House website.
Voie spoke recently with DC Velocity Group Editorial Director Mitch Mac Donald about her career, the genesis and goals of WIT, and how things must change to attract more women into the motor freight work force.
Q: How did you end up in this profession?
A: In high school, I had this passion for things like engines, woodworking, and drafting. Essentially, I was most engaged in careers that boys usually pick. I just thought things like that were so cool. So I took shop class in high school, which wasn't common back in the 1970s.
My first job was drafting at a steel fabrication plant, where I was designing material handling equipment, like pallets and racks. My manager approached me one day and said, "We're opening up a shipping department. Would you like to move over to the traffic side?" I had no clue what that meant, but I said sure. They sent me to school for traffic and transportation management, and I became the company's traffic manager.
This was at just about the time deregulation took place, so I learned how to read tariffs, how to audit freight bills, and things like that. That led to an opportunity once I got married and started my family to do consulting for trucking companies. I did that for 18 years while I raised my family.
Q: It's still largely a man's world out there in trucking, and women sadly are often subjected to some not-so-nice things: cat calling, harassment, and even assaults. Did that have anything to do with your decision to form this group?
A: What you describe is one of the things we're trying to change at Women In Trucking. We need to make women feel safe, which is not always the case today. For example, I recently found out that some schools house women in their driver training program in a bunkhouse environment—a co-ed bunkhouse! A female student contacted us to tell us that she had been accepted into a training program and was told they would provide lodging. When she got there, she learned she'd be sharing sleeping quarters with men.
We all want to make this industry a better place for women, yet we still see some outdated practices that need to change. That's why a big part of what we do is call attention to issues like co-ed bunkhouses and look to solve those problems. We developed an anti-harassment employment guide for our carrier members. It talks about a lot of these types of issues.
As another example, it used to be that we would match drivers up for training or team purposes by asking whether they smoked or not. That was the only question asked. Our anti-harassment employment guide expands on that greatly. Carriers are urged to ask questions that go deeper into matters that influence compatibility. We urge them to include questions like: "Can you discuss politics? Can you discuss religion? Do you have any food allergies?" It's more in-depth, and helps ensure that drivers are comfortable with each other from the outset.
Q: Are carriers doing enough to dismantle the barriers that discourage women from getting behind the wheel?
A: Some carriers that are starting to pay attention are really finding success in their efforts. The forward-thinking firms will come to us and ask about best practices and things they should improve.
Q: How about the challenges that are beyond a company's control—such as facilities and accommodations for drivers when they're on the road?
A: We do work with the truck stops. Many have done things like putting hair-dryers in their restrooms and enclosing showers to provide privacy. We can't have a locker-room environment the way we did in the past.
There is also the security issue. Even though many are really trying hard to put more lighting in to make their premises safer, some truck stops just aren't a safe environment. For that reason, part of what we do is teach women to be "situationally aware." Don't walk between trailers. Don't park in the back. Always have your keys and your cellphone with you. Walk with a purpose.
Q: As you think about your experiences both in the motor freight industry and with Women In Trucking, are you glad about your career choice?
A: Oh, yes. In fact, I love what I do. I love the fact that Women In Trucking is making a difference. I love the positive feedback, not just from drivers but also from companies. I love the fact that we are creating awareness and giving companies opportunities to increase the percentage of women in their work force—not just behind the wheel, but also as technicians and safety directors and managers.
But we still have a long way to go. We recently came out with the Women In Trucking Index [which tracks women's influence at publicly held carriers]. It showed that of the 15 publicly traded companies, half have no women in leadership roles and no women on their boards. The ones that do have more women, a more diverse work force, are going to be more successful.
Q: What are some key attributes or characteristics that make a woman a good candidate for a career in trucking?
A: Let's talk first about women in trucking management. You have to be comfortable working in a very male-dominated environment. Women make up 17 percent of management in the trucking industry, so you have to be able to speak up and you have to call attention to your successes. Women typically don't do that. Women like to thank their team and say, "Hey, I am successful because of the people I surround myself with." We need to say, "Hey, I am doing a good job. I deserve a promotion." At our last conference, one of our speakers was a woman who had written a book called Women Don't Ask. She talked about how woman need to ask for raises and negotiate salaries.
Helping woman with these issues is one of the biggest benefits of our annual conference. I think networking is so important. When you go to a conference like the one organized by the American Trucking Associations—and I have been going for many, many years—you'll find it is 90 percent men. At our conference, we have about 90 percent women. The networking opportunities are just amazing. You can find somebody who has a role you're interested in and ask them about it. We had two women who owned truck dealerships meet at one of our events. They were delighted to connect because it's so rare to find a woman who owns a truck dealership, and they've since become friends.
Q: How about women who might be interested in actually getting behind the wheel? Are there any characteristics or attributes that make someone a good driver candidate?
A: We've done some research on what makes for a good driver. For women, they have to be very independent and self-sufficient. They also have be comfortable being assertive and thick-skinned. Another thing we found out is that a lot of female drivers are also motorcycle riders. That indicates they're willing to try new things and aren't afraid of a nontraditional role.
Q: As you look back at your career to date, what have you found to be particularly satisfying?
A: Being recognized by the White House has to top the list. In 2012, Women In Trucking received an award from the White House for being a "Transportation Innovator Champion of Change." I got to bring my board to the White House for this honor, and Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood was there. It was really amazing to be recognized at that level.
Q: How will you know that your efforts with Women In Trucking have succeeded?
A: When a woman hops out of a truck and nobody makes a comment or gives it a second thought because it's such a common occurrence. When women are routinely found in the boardroom and in leadership roles at carriers. I don't know what the exact number would be, but I would like to see women have a much greater presence in the trucking industry.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.