Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
A sale of supply chain software firm JDA Software Group Inc. to Honeywell International Inc.—or anyone else—appears to be off the table.
Private equity firm New Mountain Capital, JDA's parent, said today that it will partner with The Blackstone Group, the private equity and investment banking giant, to invest nearly $570 million in Scottsdale, Ariz.-based JDA, which provides software services to support supply chain planning, merchandising, and pricing, all critical areas that are needed to master omnichannel
fulfillment. Blackstone, which will invest the vast majority of the total, will receive a guaranteed 7.5 percent return, according to BG Strategic Advisors (BGSA), a Palm Beach, Fla.-based logistics mergers and acquisitions consultancy. New Mountain will use the funds to pay down about one-quarter of JDA's $2 billion debt load, which would reduce JDA's annual interest expense by $70 million, according to BGSA estimates.
Honeywell declined comment on the New Mountain-Blackstone announcement. In a conference call today with analysts, JDA Chairman and CEO Bal Dail also would not comment on the Honeywell rumors. "JDA has had a number of discussions with many different firms, and the Blackstone/New Mountain outcome in my book, from my perspective, is the best outcome," Dail said.
Benjamin Gordon, BGSA's founder and managing partner, said New Mountain could have sold JDA to several suitors, including Honeywell. Instead, New Mountain concluded that they would make more money if they doubled down, brought in Blackstone, paid down debt, and focused on growing the business.
Dwight Klappich, a vice president and supply chain specialist at the Stamford, Conn.-based consultancy Gartner Inc., said New Mountain might be doing Honeywell a favor by declining to sell. "The track record of industrial companies buying into the business application space has been atrocious," Klappich said. That's because most software used by industrial companies focuses on "operational technology," which is the domain of engineers, and not information technology, which is the purview of IT departments, Klappich said. "They are not the same, and success in one has no influence on success in the other," he said.
Despite that, industrial firms enamored by the growing importance of "software" in their business conclude that all software applications are the same and can be effectively executed in a uniform manner, he said.
Today's announcement should compel Honeywell to reconsider its strategic direction in the warehouse and DC space, Klappich said. For example, if all Honeywell wanted from JDA was warehouse management systems (WMS) capabilities, there are more than 30 WMS vendors available at a fraction of the cost, he said.
Klappich added that he wasn't sure what value Honeywell would derive from JDA's strengths in supply chain planning, merchandising, and pricing, areas where Honeywell has little involvement.
In a report issued this morning before the Blackstone investment was announced, London-based consultancy International Data Corp. (IDC), said Honeywell would be overpaying for an asset of questionable value. IDC acknowledged that Honeywell CEO Dave Cote has said that about half of the company's 23,000 engineers are currently working on software, but the consulting company
questioned whether those workers have the "software industry acumen to pull their objective off," or if Honeywell is "investing in the hope that JDA's current leadership can do it—something it hasn't been able to do as of late?"
IDC acknowledged that any industrial automation vendor would covet JDA's huge installed customer base. However, it wondered if Honeywell has "fully evaluated the financial value of JDA, a company that is struggling to keep its customers from jumping ship for a more innovative and future-proofed alternative."
IDC noted that JDA was recently downgraded by investment grading firm Moody's because of its high debt load.
John Santagate, an IDC analyst, said that although New Mountain and Blackstone's investment would help JDA balance its books, the news did not have any implications for the future of a potential Honeywell merger.
"One thing for sure is that JDA understands there's a debt issue, and they have to take care of it," Santagate said. "They have two options on the table now: one is a buyout by Honeywell and the other deal is a capital injection by New Mountain and Blackstone. Either way, at the end of the day, the deal is good for JDA."
AN INVESTMENT IN FUTURE PRODUCTS
JDA pledged to devote its new funds to improving its software products, both by enhancing existing, on-premise software solutions
and by investing in cloud-based products. Supply chain companies will need tools from both areas as they adapt to industry trends
such as the Internet of Things, big data, and analytics, JDA said.
"Clearly some retailers in North America are going through some pain points, as there have been announcements about store
closures and what have you because of the move to online," Dail said on the call. "But overall globally we see opportunities
in both manufacturing and retail as well the other sector we serve, which is third-party logistics."
"The bulk of our $100 million R&D budget is in current products, so we can now accelerate investment in next-generation products,"
Dail said. "We have a pipeline of things we want to build on that platform, around store logistics operations, manufacturing
planning, demand and replenishment, and a next-generation digital hub."
At the same time, JDA plans to continue its support for software applications hosted on-premise, he said.
"We're seeing increased automation in the warehouse, but if you're building a highly automated distribution center, you have to
have a warehouse management system that talks directly to the material handling equipment," Dail said. "That has to happen at a
very, very rapid pace, so they don't want the latency of having the warehouse management system sitting in the cloud. Even with
high network bandwidth, the latency is just too high for a highly automated distribution center."
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.