"Bullishly skeptical" on Cuba: interview with Rob Kemp
There's great opportunity in supporting U.S. brands that will soon have access to 12 million stuff-starved people. But as Rob Kemp and his colleagues discovered during their Cuba trade mission in March, only the very patient need apply.
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Robert Kemp founded DRT Transportation was part of a group that visited Cuba earlier this year.
The day before President Obama's historic March 21 visit to Cuba, a group of 18 U.S. logistics practitioners, accompanied by three executives of the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), arrived on the island for a mission that, while not nearly as symbolic, may be more significant. The group spent five days observing Cuba's infrastructure and gauging the country's ability to handle the potential acceleration of logistics demand to support American businesses if the U.S. trade embargo with Cuba is fully lifted.
One member of the entourage was Robert Kemp, founder and president of DRT Transportation LLC, a third-party logistics service provider (3PL) based in Lebanon, Pa. A natural entrepreneur, Kemp seems right at home in a country where business risk-taking is a daily activity. But Kemp is also a pragmatic businessman responsible for his customers' lifeblood: their goods. Kemp sees the chance to get in on the ground floor of a market of 12 million, many of who will have access to U.S.-made goods for the first time. But he sees Cuba for what it is today: a nation with great potential and with a competitive seaport, but with little else, including the disposable income its consumers will need to buy U.S. exports.
In an interview with Mark B. Solomon, executive editor-news, Kemp talks about his experience, the opportunities, and why he is (in our words, not his) "bullishly skeptical."
Q: Cuba wants to be a cross-dock point for imports moving through the expanded Panama Canal and bound for U.S. markets, especially the New York metro area. That potentially means a lot of cargo headed for Havana. Is that doable?
A: It is, conceptually. The Port of Mariel is a modern facility that has on-dock rail capabilities. We were told it could scale up its capacity without physically expanding. Investors in the port envision it as a cross-dock location for imports coming through the canal and bound for the East Coast and Europe. Miami is the closest U.S. deepwater point, but it is too far from the Northeast's dense populations.
Q: Do you sense that DRT's customers are eager to do business in Cuba? Or is there a reluctance to step into the market?
A: "Eager" is a strong word. We have discussed this with some of our key customers, and the responses have been all over the board. The market opportunity exists. With a population of about 12 million, Cuba is as big as Greater Los Angeles. It would benefit from the modernization that can come with improved trade relations with the U.S. Solving the socioeconomic challenges seems improbable in the short term. Having cruise ships dock in Havana for a day is a long way from total trade.
Q: Virtually no U.S. transport and logistics practitioner has done business in Cuba. If a U.S. company makes the leap, what should it brace itself for?
A: Unfortunately, after Mariel, the infrastructure rapidly deteriorates. The preferred method to move goods across the island is port to port, which illustrates how poor the road infrastructure is. Most containers move on flatbed trucks because there are virtually no available chassis. Container dwell times can hit 21 days, unheard of in the U.S. Yet these challenges represent opportunities for the right companies. Port operator PSA International projected that Mariel could almost triple its current TEU (twenty-foot equivalent unit) capacity without needing to actually expand. We were told that Mariel handled close to 300,000 TEUs in 2015, and as noted earlier, the port was built with a plan to expand its TEU capacity.
Q: What else struck you, positively and negatively, about the condition of Cuba's transport system?
Cuba's famous 1950s-era cars are kept in operating condition with imported parts and metal fabricated on the island.
A: What surprised me was the state of the total infrastructure, not just as it related to freight and logistics movement. Most Cubans use public transportation. Import duties on automobiles make it virtually impossible to own a finished automobile. The classic 1950s cars that seem frozen in time and that many Americans associate with post-revolutionary Cuba are almost exclusively taxis now. They are maintained by an amazing system of imported parts and by metal "artists" that fabricate their own parts. The taxi owners are immensely proud of the condition of their cars. It is a highlight of Havana.
Q: U.S. businesses are lagging behind their counterparts from other countries that never imposed a trade embargo on Cuba. Will U.S. companies find it difficult to dislodge established non-U.S. providers?
A: I don't believe U.S. firms will have difficulty competing in Cuba if the embargo is lifted. The U.S. has a huge nearshoring advantage. It seems that most countries currently trading with Cuba do not have a large presence there. Our collective capabilities should serve us well given that Cuba's energy, civil engineering, and telecommunications ecosystems are stuck in the 1950s.
Q: What advice would you give a U.S. logistics provider that's interested in doing business there?
A: Align yourself with local asset-based partners serving the island. The reason is that there are still countless legal and regulatory questions about doing business there. For example, can U.S. logistics companies open offices in Cuba, or will they be required to use one of the three current government-owned freight forwarders like Transcargo? That's just one of many questions. You want to partner with someone who knows the local ways and means.
U.S. companies also need to understand how the currency works. Foreign companies would deal with the Cuban convertible peso (CUC), while locals would still transact in Cuban pesos. Foreign companies would pay the government in CUC currency, and the government would then pay the employees in Cuban pesos. Essentially, the currency conversion is a tax kept by the government. I know that as the landscape changes, logistics associations like TIA will play an important role in facilitating such an important endeavor.
Q: In your discussions with Cuban officials, did you get any clarity on when the country could be ready to hit the regional or global trade stage?
A: Cuba feels it's ready now. The investments in Mariel and the passing of the "Law of Foreign Investment," which opened up Cuba to foreign investors, are the catalysts. The newly established Mariel Special Development Zone (ZEDM) already has established businesses that have 100 percent foreign investment. A Belgian logistics company handles shipments at the port. We also saw a few warehouses going up that were being built exclusively with foreign capital. Previously, foreign companies looking to serve Cuba had to partner with the government to gain a foothold.
Q: Given the impoverished state of the Cuban economy, how can the Cuban people afford to pay for Western-style goods?
A: With all Cuba's potential, nothing economically sustainable can occur until the income question is addressed. We were told the average Cuban earns about 540 Cuban pesos per month, which is equivalent to about US$20. Prices of most foodstuffs are kept artificially low. But disposable income for consumables is a luxury.
Q: Fidel Castro is an aging figurehead, while his brother, President Raul Castro, is also up in years and has said he will step down in 2018. Do you foresee a liberalization of trade activity once they are gone from the scene and a younger generation of leaders takes their place?
A: Regardless of what government is in power, the key policy issue is and will continue to be how Cuba's debt obligations are served and how its credit standing is addressed. Can the current Cuban government, or its future governments, improve the country's creditworthiness? That issue as well as others that go beyond transportation and logistics are for the governments and international organizations to address. My focus is to understand Cuba's changing landscape and to be prepared to serve DRT's customers if and when the time comes.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."