Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Less-than-truckload (LTL) carriers, struggling with weak demand for industrial traffic and perhaps facing another round of price wars, have turned to the so-called final mile of delivery services, a competitive and specialized discipline, in an effort to build a sustainable revenue channel.
It will likely take LTL carriers out of their comfort zone. Working the "final mile," defined in today's marketplace as deliveries to a consumer's residence from a manufacturer, distributor, or retailer, means serving a segment largely unfamiliar to LTL carriers. It means dealing with more hyper-connected and demanding end customers than LTL carriers, in their relatively limited forays into residential deliveries, are accustomed to encounter.
It means entering a crowded and fragmented field of providers. About 7,000 carriers nationwide—many of them undercapitalized, mom-and-pop type businesses—provide some form of last-mile delivery service, according to FM2 Logistics Solutions, an Austin, Texas-based firm that connects shippers and LTL carriers with a national network of final and "first"-mile carriers through its IT platform. These small firms have specific skill sets in residential deliveries, and could complement LTL carriers either as partners or as bolt-on acquisitions, Kirk Godby, a partner at FM2, said late last month at a conference held by transportation data provider SMC3 in Chicago.
It also means entering the collective wheelhouses of companies like Seattle-based Amazon.com, the world's largest e-tailer, which is building a last-mile delivery system to be manned by hundreds of local delivery companies, and San Francisco-based vehicle-hire service Uber Technologies Inc., which boasts that its model and network could be leveraged for last-mile deliveries of stuff. Amazon and Uber are the companies resetting customer expectations about service, which LTL carriers that seek to carve out a niche in the final-mile business will need to adhere to.
Meeting the constant pressure to grow means leaving no stone unturned, however, and the message coming from a session devoted to the subject at the SMC3 event was that LTL carriers avoid this segment at their peril. The last-mile delivery segment, which touches all business-to-consumer e-commerce shipments, is big and getting bigger. E-commerce today comprises only about 12 to 13 percent of all retail sales, according to various estimates. This indicates there is much more share up for grabs, especially as the traditional retailers that now control most of the market move more of their selling to the digital world.
With few entry barriers, LTL carriers are free, like so many others, to pursue the last-mile business. To succeed is likely to require changes in fleet composition and utilization; a better means of communicating digitally; and an emphasis on hitting tight and precise delivery-time targets, according to comments made at the session.
For those carriers that want to provide "white glove" service, industry parlance for a full-blown customer experience that includes product setup and installation, it will require finding drivers who not only can operate a truck but are skilled in assembling large, complex items—and in interacting with customers within very personal areas of their residences, such as a kitchen or bedroom. Last-mile carrier executives said they will weigh a driver applicant's interpersonal skills above all other qualities; prospective employees, they reckon, can be trained to drive a truck and assemble an appliance, but can't be taught how to properly interact with folks in their homes.
Unsurprisingly, capacity is tight because there aren't many drivers experienced in residential interaction and product installation. The shortage is particularly acute around holiday periods, such as the Fourth of July weekend, when a nationwide surge in sales from retailers drives up buyer interest. Will O'Shea, chief marketing and sales officer for XPO Last Mile, the last-mile delivery unit of Greenwich, Conn.-based transport and logistics firm XPO Logistics Inc., said at the SMC conference that his unit has trouble recruiting drivers in some markets because they lack the "soft skills" needed to execute its full-service proposition. XPO Last Mile makes about 12 million deliveries a year and operates out of 50 dedicated facilities in the U.S.
USING WHAT YOU HAVE
One carrier that plays the last mile on its own terms is Pitt Ohio Express LLC, a Pittsburgh-based firm involved in truckload, regional LTL with its own network (it has a national U.S. and Canadian link-up with the "Reliance Network" of six U.S. and Canadian LTL carriers), and parcel deliveries. Pitt Ohio integrates U.S. last-mile deliveries with its LTL network and its solo drivers, according to Geoffrey Messing, the company's chief marketing officer and executive vice president. It eschews team drivers, and declines any requests to deliver goods that require two drivers to handle, Messing said. Pitt Ohio does not offer setup and installation services, and its drivers will not go further than the "first threshold" of a residence, or the first covered area such as a foyer. Typically, the goods will be dropped off at curbside or on a driveway, Messing said.
Pitt Ohio chose to leverage its own network for final-mile services after discovering that more than half of the shipments moved 50 miles or more from one of its terminals, according to Messing. The relatively long stage lengths gave Pitt Ohio the flexibility to piggyback last-mile shipments onto its traditional business-to-business delivery infrastructure, Messing said.
Using its own equipment turned out to be more cost effective for Pitt Ohio than relying on local delivery agents, Messing said. He noted in a separate phone interview that the "incremental cost" of adding last-mile deliveries to a route was more than offset by the generous fees the carrier charged its retailer customers. While its bread-and-butter LTL business is showing little, if any, growth, its residential business is up about 20 percent so far this year, Messing told the SMC3 gathering.
LTL carriers will take growth anywhere they can find it these days. The nation's industrial economy, the backbone of the LTL business, has been in a recession since last fall, and has taken carrier volumes with it. Weight per shipment is down, reducing carrier revenue and margins. Carriers are reporting better operating ratios—defined as a company's operating expenses as a percentage of its revenue—an indication they continue to run efficiently. They have also maintained the pricing discipline that was instituted following disastrous rate wars that took place from 2007 to 2010, as carriers sought to defend shrinking market shares and several tried unsuccessfully to drive YRC Worldwide Inc., then the industry leader, out of business.
However, there are indications that the rate resolve may be cracking. David S. Congdon, vice chairman and CEO of Thomasville, N.C.-based Old Dominion Freight Line Inc., arguably the best-run LTL carrier, said in late April that rate battles had become more commonplace as carriers struggled with a difficult operating environment. On Tuesday, FedEx Freight, the LTL unit of Memphis-based FedEx Corp., reported that some price discounts "are reaching very high levels."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."