Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
The chairman of the nation's largest freight broker group today urged his members not to rely on data generated by the federal government's Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) motor carrier grading program as criteria to choose a trucker, telling them they are "putting your company and industry at risk" by doing so.
Jeffrey G. Tucker, who is also CEO of Haddonfield, N.J.-based third-party logistics provider (3PL) Tucker Company Worldwide Inc., said the carrier-grading data made public by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), although different from what was publicly available six months ago, is still flawed and unreliable. Under the federal transport-funding bill signed into law last December, FMCSA was ordered to remove scores from its Safety Measurement System that grades carriers in comparison with one another. However, the sub-agency of the Department of Transportation was allowed to maintain the raw data used to compile the scores.
Tucker told the Transportation Intermediaries Association's annual meeting in San Antonio that the same faulty data points are still present, and that all FMCSA has done is "put them up in a different fashion."
Tucker restated TIA's fundamental position that it is the FMCSA's responsibility, not the brokerage industry's, to determine whether a carrier is fit to operate, and that a safety fitness decision should boil down to a simple "yes or no." Shippers and brokers have argued for nearly six years that they should not be liable for damages in the event of an accident involving a carrier they've hired because the broker interpreted the carrier's fitness using inaccurate and incomplete data.
In January, FMCSA said it would change its evaluation formula by replacing a three-tier fitness rating—satisfactory, conditional, and unsatisfactory—with a single determination. A carrier's fitness would be based on its performance under five of seven "Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories" (BASICs) that make up a safety score, along with the results of carrier investigations and crash reports. Carriers found unfit to operate will be given that classification, at which time they will be ordered out of service and not reinstated until they've shown improvement, FMCSA said.
The agency said its proposal more effectively targets its limited resources at carriers that show higher crash risks. The new approach will allow the agency to determine the fitness of about 75,000 carriers a month, the agency said. Today, FMCSA investigates only 15,000 carriers a year, with fewer than half of those even receiving a safety rating, it said. The proposal will also eliminate the chief concern around comparative scoring—that it would tar safe carriers with the same broad brush as unsafe ones—according to the agency.
However, TIA and other groups have said the accuracy of the BASIC data remains dubious, and all the agency is doing is dressing up the numbers in different clothing. They also maintain that FMCSA is thwarting Congressional intent by improperly using data that has been generated in its Safety Measurement System (SMS), which grades carriers based on the BASIC data.
Tucker added that ongoing consolidation in the brokerage industry benefits most TIA members, because customers upset over post-merger service problems will flee to brokers with consistent and reliable service levels. He also took issue with concerns over a shortage of commercial truck drivers, saying that in the last four years the number of qualified for-hire drivers grew to 2.4 million from 1.9 million drivers. Tucker acknowledged the big carriers are experiencing a "massive" driver shortage, but said their situation is not representative of the entire industry.
Tucker said new-fangled models known as "Uber-brokers," which purport to connect shippers directly with carriers and disintermediate the traditional broker, would only disrupt the business if brokers let it. He warned brokers that don't climb the value curve with their shipper customers and carrier vendors may find themselves being taken out of the equation. The basic load-matching service "is just the tip of the spear" of necessary service offerings, he said.
Tucker said the brokerage industry's tremendous embrace of IT tools will put it in good stead as the industry becomes more digitally driven than ever. The sector is the "most voracious consumer of technology" of any industry, he said. By contrast, shippers are behind the curve in IT uptake, he said. Today's Transportation Management Systems (TMS) that shippers use "are nowhere close to nimble," he said.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.