Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
With the rise of the environmentally conscious consumer and the growing importance of sustainability to corporate boardrooms, more and more companies are looking to reduce their carbon footprint and the amount of waste they send to the landfill.
One area that is increasingly being viewed through a green lens is packaging. Pallet companies and trade groups have responded by touting their particular type of pallet—wood, corrugated, plastic, or metal—as a sustainable choice. But if you dig a little deeper, you'll find that each material has both strengths and weaknesses.
Here's a rundown of each type of pallet's impact on the planet.
WOOD IS GOOD
Wood is by far the most common type of material being used to make pallets today, and it has a lot to recommend it as far as sustainability goes. Wood is a renewable resource, and, according to the National Wooden Pallet and Container Association (NWPCA), it requires far less energy to produce than any other common type of pallet material. "You plant a tree, you leave it, it grows," says Patrick Atagi, the group's executive vice president of advocacy and external affairs.
Of course, it's not quite as simple as that. Trees do not grow overnight; it takes 30 to 40 years before a tree is large enough to be harvested for wood. But decades of forest management efforts mean that the United States is in little danger of running low on wood, even if housing starts return to the levels seen during the housing bubble. According to the "National Report on Sustainable Forests" published by the U.S. Forest Service in 2010, the number of acres of forest in the United States has remained stable for the last 50 years and the amount of wood being produced per acre has actually increased.
Wood pallets are also reusable and/or recyclable. If damaged, a wooden pallet can easily be repaired—typically, all that's required is to pull off the old board and hammer on a new one. When a pallet can no longer be repaired or remanufactured into a recycled pallet, it can be reprocessed and the wood fibers used in such products as mulch, particleboard, and animal bedding. All of these end-of-life efforts, however, require that the pallet user have effective waste management processes in place, typically working with a pallet recycler. (Companies looking to locate a pallet recycler near their facilities can search the online directory available on NWPCA's website.)
THE INCREDIBLE LIGHTNESS OF CARDBOARD
Not everyone believes that wood pallets are the best choice for the environment. A nonprofit organization launched last year called Change the Pallet is making aggressive claims that switching to corrugated cardboard pallets could greatly reduce carbon emissions. The group was heavily involved in an attempt to pass a bill in Oregon's House of Representatives to require state agencies to switch to cardboard pallets where appropriate. While the bill never made it out of committee, the governor did approve a pilot with the Department of Corrections.
The reason that cardboard pallets lead to reductions in carbon emissions, according to the group's executive director, Adam Pener, is weight. While wood pallets typically weigh around 50 pounds, cardboard pallets weigh about 10. When trucks transport less weight, he says, they consume less fuel.
A case in point is the global furniture company Ikea, which made headlines in 2012 when it announced an initiative to switch from wood pallets to cardboard or paperboard pallets. According to Ikea, since 2012, the company has cut its carbon emissions by more than 300,000 metric tons and reduced the number of trucks it uses by 15 percent, while transporting the same volume of goods.
The one area where cardboard pallets do not measure up to their competitors is in length of life. Although cardboard pallets can be made as strong as wood, they are typically designed to be used only once. Skeptics have also expressed concern about their durability and water resistance, although Pener insists that they can easily be treated with a waterproof coating.
Cardboard pallets, however, are much easier to recycle than other pallet types. According to Pener, companies can simply toss their cardboard pallets into a baler and recycle them along with their other corrugate.
PLASTICS FOR LIFE
In contrast to their counterparts over on the cardboard pallet side, makers of plastic pallets stake their sustainability claims on their pallets' longevity. According to Adam Gurga, national account manager, consumer packaged goods supply chains, for the plastic pallet manufacturer Rehrig Pacific, plastic pallets often last five to six years. "And I've been in some of our customers' facilities where they're still using pallets they purchased 10 years ago," he says.
That durability also helps the pallet to better protect the product it is transporting. The less damage that occurs to both the pallet and the product, the fewer resources will be consumed in making replacements. On top of that, companies will be minimizing their carbon footprint because they won't be transporting as many replacement pallets and goods.
No matter how durable a pallet is, however, if you run it over with an 8,000-pound forklift, it's going to break. While some plastic pallets are repairable, most are not. Still, plastic pallets can be recycled, and many plastic pallet companies will even pick up the damaged units from you. The pallets are ground down into plastic resin, which can be reused to make recycled plastic pallets (although the quality is not as high as it is with new ones) or other plastic products.
That said, potential plastic pallet users must weigh the environmental costs of simply manufacturing plastic. Unlike wood or cardboard, plastic pallets are typically made from high-density polyethylene or polypropylene, which requires nonrenewable resources such as oil or natural gas to produce.
Finally, for plastic pallets to be truly sustainable (not just environmentally but also economically), companies either need to use a pooler or have some way of guaranteeing that they can get their pallets back.
ALUMINUM REINCARNATION
The weight of most metal pallets makes them unsuitable for many applications. Aluminum pallets, however, weigh on average less than 40 pounds, and aluminum pallet companies like to tout their environmental benefits.
To be sure, the environmental cost of producing aluminum is high. For starters, the raw material, bauxite, must be mined from the earth. On top of that, processing and manufacturing aluminum consumes a great deal of energy.
However, once it is produced, aluminum is "infinitely recyclable," in the words of Peter Johnson, president of Eco Aluminum Pallets. And unlike the situation with plastic, the recycling process does not degrade the quality of aluminum. So one way to lessen the pallets' environmental impact is to use pallets made out of recycled aluminum. Recycled aluminum is readily available, and Johnson has no concerns about the supply's decreasing.
Aluminum pallets are also durable. Eco Aluminum Pallets, for example, guarantees its pallets for 10 years. While the majority of metal pallets are nonrepairable, Eco Aluminum Pallets has created a repairable version that is riveted together.
Aluminum pallets are not for everyone, however. They are best suited for closed-loop or captive environments, where the company can maintain control of the pallet and runs little risk of losing a valuable asset.
THE THREE Rs
If you take a close look at each type of pallet, you'll see that there are pluses and minuses for each in terms of sustainability. The best advice might be to evaluate which type of pallet makes the most sense for your operation and product. It might be that a change could benefit your particular operation.
But no matter what type of pallet they use, most companies could benefit from thinking about their pallets in terms of the three Rs: reduce, reuse, and recycle.
Companies can start by asking themselves whether there are ways they can reduce the number of pallets they use. For example, can they redesign their pallet load so they can add an extra layer of product on the pallet? The more product you get on one pallet, the fewer pallets you use (and ultimately, the fewer trucks you'll need). This means fewer resources used to create the pallet itself and fewer trucks on the road, which cuts down on carbon emissions. (For a few examples, see "Six small packaging changes that can save big money,"DC Velocity, March 2016.)
When it comes to reuse, are there ways the company can get more use out of its pallets? Could its pallets be designed to last longer, maybe by using a higher-quality material? Many wood pallet companies can use special pallet design software to create a pallet that is optimized to your needs. In addition, effective education on pallet handling—particularly for those who operate pallet jacks and forklift trucks—can reduce the amount of damage that a pallet sustains and the number of replacement pallets needed.
Finally, does the company have an effective recycling program in place for pallets that have reached the end of their life? And do your employees know what that policy is?
Such changes may have as much to do with creating a sustainable pallet operation as the type of material that the pallets are made of.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."