Best known as the host of the TV shows "Dirty Jobs" and "Somebody's Gotta Do It," Mike Rowe is a passionate advocate for the blue-collar professions that underpin our economy but are often undervalued and overlooked.
Mitch Mac Donald has more than 30 years of experience in both the newspaper and magazine businesses. He has covered the logistics and supply chain fields since 1988. Twice named one of the Top 10 Business Journalists in the U.S., he has served in a multitude of editorial and publishing roles. The leading force behind the launch of Supply Chain Management Review, he was that brand's founding publisher and editorial director from 1997 to 2000. Additionally, he has served as news editor, chief editor, publisher and editorial director of Logistics Management, as well as publisher of Modern Materials Handling. Mitch is also the president and CEO of Agile Business Media, LLC, the parent company of DC VELOCITY and CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
Think of TV personality Mike Rowe, and a certain image inevitably comes to mind: a trim middle-aged man wearing a baseball cap, blue jeans, and a big grin on his face—all splotched with dirt, mud, or a combination thereof.
That untidy but cheerful image arises from Rowe's best-known role, as creator and host of the Discovery Channel show "Dirty Jobs," where he profiled "people who do dirty jobs and keep our civilized life on the rails." (To see a dumBíounding list of the jobs Rowe undertook for that show, go to mikerowe.com/about-mike/resume/.) A few years after "Dirty Jobs" ended its eight-year run, he launched "Somebody's Gotta Do It" on CNN, which introduces viewers to people with unique jobs—everything from performing as a rodeo clown to manufacturing bobblehead figurines.
In both series, Rowe worked alongside the people he interviewed. Those experiences gave him a deep appreciation for the blue-collar jobs that underpin the nation's economy yet are underappreciated and often go unfilled. Determined to combat negative stereotypes about hands-on labor, in 2008 he launched the mikeroweWorks Foundation, which awards scholarships to students pursuing a career in trades like welding, refrigeration, and manufacturing. To date, the organization has given out some $3 million in grants.
Rowe, whose decidedly nonlinear career path has included (among other things) television host, product pitch man, documentary narrator, and even opera singer, writes and speaks frequently about issues like the widening skills gap, offshore manufacturing, and why millions of jobs are available despite high unemployment levels. He has twice testified before U.S. Senate committees about the challenges facing trade workers, miners, farmers, and similar professions and the importance of changing negative perceptions about blue-collar work.
In "Why Dirty Jobs Matter," his keynote address at the MHI 2015 annual conference, Rowe followed humorous tales of his experiences with a call for a national campaign to attract young people to skilled trades. After his presentation, DC Velocity Group Editorial Director Mitch Mac Donald sat down with Rowe to talk about his advocacy for blue-collar vocations. Here are some highlights from that conversation.
Q: You have entertained a lot of people, but there are some important underlying messages in the work you are doing. One of them relates to the issue of how our society, government, and media have somehow diminished the value of blue-collar labor. Why has that happened, and is there anything we can do about it?
A: I think it has happened for the same reason that our thinking on just about every major topic constantly teeters back and forth. It is very, very hard to find equilibrium in anything, it seems, so we are constantly going to be re-evaluating the definition of meaningful work, a good job, a good education.
For instance, it used to be enough to say a good education is really important, but now we have to say, what is a good education? The answer (today) is, a good education is higher education. Well, if (what you have) is not a higher education, then what is it? Is that a bad education? Well, no, we wouldn't say that, but we might say it is an alternative education. So suddenly you've got a four-year degree representing all that is good in education, and everything else getting filed under this umbrella of "alternative," which is just another way of saying "subordinate."
Q: Yes, or you say, "Well, you're just not college material," which is what Dean Wormer said to Mr. Blutarsky in the movie "Animal House."
A: And the crazy thing is that back then, when "Animal House" was taking place—in the '50s and '60s, and in real life, into the '70s—college needed a PR campaign! There weren't a lot of people aspiring to go to school, and people viewed college as something for snobby, elitist types. So colleges needed to do something to become way more egalitarian, and they did, but in the process of promoting college, we wound up diminishing a lot of other trades that today are on the ropes. Now, work is portrayed in many cases as the enemy. Work is the reason you're not as happy as you could be. You want to be happy and work less. That is what the 40-hour workweek is all about.
With the reality TV shows, that has changed a bit. It used to be all about "American Idol"; now you have "Dirty Jobs" and "Deadliest Catch." You have some other shows that actually show work more or less like it is, and that is great. But there are always two different sides struggling to cut through and be heard. At the moment, it seems to me that skilled trades, manufacturing, and transportation are great opportunities desperately in need of good PR.
Q: And desperately in need of good folks. A lot of these jobs go unfilled. Over-the-road truckers have been dealing with a driver shortage for decades, and those are good-paying jobs.
A: That is right. But how many parents today are affirmatively saying, "Kid, you know what? You would be great in a warehouse. You would be great driving a truck. You would be great with a welding torch"? They should be, because for a lot of people, that is everything a great opportunity ought to represent. It is just not being put on the table when they are making big decisions.
Q: You have commented that the folks you worked with (during "Dirty Jobs") were among the happiest people in their work that you have come across. Is that a validation of what you're talking about?
A: Well, for me it was a surprise, because I showed up with all the bias and prejudice that defines my life. Like a lot of people, I would imagine that a guy riding shotgun on a garbage truck would be dreaming about doing something better. What I found was a lot of guys in sanitation who looked forward to their work, who loved the business of doing what they did, and who were—never mind not apologizing for it—eager to brag about it. That is the thing that took me aback. I was surprised by how many people I met who were unapologetically proud, almost gleeful, to be sexing chickens, or working in a sewer, or repairing water towers or the skyscrapers in New York.
Q: In "Dirty Jobs," you worked in all 50 states and performed 300 jobs. Did you touch the logistics world in any of those roles?
A: Well, not to be glib, but I can't think of a "dirty job" that didn't touch logistics. Some of them hit it on the head pretty hard. Yes, I have done long-distance trucking. I have worked in all kinds of factories and warehouses. Finding the person in the supply chain who is doing a critical but completely invisible thing—that was my mission and then to treat that person like Brad Pitt. And spend a day figuring out exactly what it is they did. The supply chain is such a great place to do that because it requires so many different links. It truly is a chain.
Q: There is some very important work you do that folks who have seen you on TV might not be aware of, and that is running the mikeroweWorks Foundation. Tell us a little bit about that.
A: "Dirty Jobs" was a hit and I did very well by it. When the economy really turned in '08, '09, and '10, the things I noticed more than anything were "help wanted" signs. The headlines in the papers were about 12- to 15-percent unemployment, but everybody I saw was struggling to find talent. It just seemed like two different narratives were going on at the same time in the country, and the unemployment narrative was getting all the press.
The skills gap wasn't (being recognized), so my foundation started as a PR campaign to shine a light on good jobs that actually existed. It then morphed into an attempt to reward people who wanted to learn a skill that was actually in demand. So we award Work Ethic scholarships today. It is interesting to me that we have scholarships that reward academic achievement, athletic achievement, talent, and, of course, need. What we don't have are scholarships that reward work ethic. Who is affirmatively looking for the kid who wakes up early, stays late, is willing to relocate, is willing to volunteer for the scut work? Those are the people I have met day in and day out on the show, and those are the people and that is the behavior I choose to reward.
Q: Skills and cultural fit are important. But if people are not coming into jobs with a work ethic, they probably aren't going to be the kind of employees you want them to be.
A: I know it is very Horatio Alger and old school, but I still say it. I don't care if you are at a McDonald's. I don't care what warehouse you are in. Show up early. Find your boss and say, "What do you need?" I mean every couple of hours. Not like a total suck-up, but make your presence known. Volunteer for a hard thing. Within six months, you will be elevated. Within a year, you are going to be "The Guy," and if you want to run the joint in a couple of years ... I have seen it happen so many times.
Attitude, work ethic—those are the things we wind up bemoaning after the fact and try to instill after we have made the hire. It is entirely backward.
Q: I think that is a gene that you're either born with or you're not.
A: Maybe so, but I would also argue that it is a choice. I have seen a lot of people who have looked around and just concluded that, all things considered, it's easier to sit home and play video games. Somebody else is going to take care of me. I don't want to sound like a scold because honestly, in my life, there was a time when if you said "I'll give you this much for doing nothing, and this much or maybe a little less for working 50, 60 hours a week," I might have hesitated too. We just have to set the table differently, and we have to encourage the kind of behavior that we truly want to reward.
Q: Where can people find out more about the foundation?
A: At mikerowe.com. It is still a lot about PR, but you will see our partners that are involved in work-force recruitment. You can apply for a scholarship there. You can ask me questions there. I try and stay available, and we try and keep the conversation lively.
Editor's note: To watch a video of the complete interview with Mike Rowe, go to www.dcvelocity.com/MikeRowe.
The supply chain risk management firm Overhaul has landed $55 million in backing, saying the financing will fuel its advancements in artificial intelligence and support its strategic acquisition roadmap.
The equity funding round comes from the private equity firm Springcoast Partners, with follow-on participation from existing investors Edison Partners and Americo. As part of the investment, Springcoast’s Chris Dederick and Holger Staude will join Overhaul’s board of directors.
According to Austin, Texas-based Overhaul, the money comes as macroeconomic and global trade dynamics are driving consequential transformations in supply chains. That makes cargo visibility and proactive risk management essential tools as shippers manage new routes and suppliers.
“The supply chain technology space will see significant consolidation over the next 12 to 24 months,” Barry Conlon, CEO of Overhaul, said in a release. “Overhaul is well-positioned to establish itself as the ultimate integrated solution, delivering a comprehensive suite of tools for supply chain risk management, efficiency, and visibility under a single trusted platform.”
Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science were hot business topics in 2024 and will remain on the front burner in 2025, according to recent research published in AI in Action, a series of technology-focused columns in the MIT Sloan Management Review.
In Five Trends in AI and Data Science for 2025, researchers Tom Davenport and Randy Bean outline ways in which AI and our data-driven culture will continue to shape the business landscape in the coming year. The information comes from a range of recent AI-focused research projects, including the 2025 AI & Data Leadership Executive Benchmark Survey, an annual survey of data, analytics, and AI executives conducted by Bean’s educational firm, Data & AI Leadership Exchange.
The five trends range from the promise of agentic AI to the struggle over which C-suite role should oversee data and AI responsibilities. At a glance, they reveal that:
Leaders will grapple with both the promise and hype around agentic AI. Agentic AI—which handles tasks independently—is on the rise, in the form of generative AI bots that can perform some content-creation tasks. But the authors say it will be a while before such tools can handle major tasks—like make a travel reservation or conduct a banking transaction.
The time has come to measure results from generative AI experiments. The authors say very few companies are carefully measuring productivity gains from AI projects—particularly when it comes to figuring out what their knowledge-based workers are doing with the freed-up time those projects provide. Doing so is vital to profiting from AI investments.
The reality about data-driven culture sets in. The authors found that 92% of survey respondents feel that cultural and change management challenges are the primary barriers to becoming data- and AI-driven—indicating that the shift to AI is about much more than just the technology.
Unstructured data is important again. The ability to apply Generative AI tools to manage unstructured data—such as text, images, and video—is putting a renewed focus on getting all that data into shape, which takes a whole lot of human effort. As the authors explain “organizations need to pick the best examples of each document type, tag or graph the content, and get it loaded into the system.” And many companies simply aren’t there yet.
Who should run data and AI? Expect continued struggle. Should these roles be concentrated on the business or tech side of the organization? Opinions differ, and as the roles themselves continue to evolve, the authors say companies should expect to continue to wrestle with responsibilities and reporting structures.
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Editor's note: This story was revised on January 9 to include additional input from the ILA, USMX, and Freightos.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.