The U.S. truckload spot market has found itself so far this year in the same doldrums where it spent most of 2015, a trend that, unless reversed, will put shippers in the familiar position of calling the pricing shots and motor carriers in the familiar position of taking them.
The spot, or noncontractual, market was weak during virtually all of last year, spiking upward meaningfully on a month-over-month basis only in December. Some chalked up the weakness to the markets reverting to the mean following an extraordinary 2014, when bad winter weather in that year's first quarter shut down capacity, sent spot rates soaring to record highs, and kept them elevated for quarters to follow.
But as the calendar has turned, the comparisons with 2014 have grown stale. After rising at the immediate turn of 2016, spot market load-to-truck ratios—the ratio of the number of loads per available truck—and spot rates slid across the board in the week ending Jan. 16, DAT Solutions, a consultancy that operates one of the nation's largest load board networks, said in a report late Wednesday. In the dry-van segment, load posts fell 21 percent from the week ending Jan. 9, while the number of available trucks rose 29 percent, according to DAT. This caused load-to-truck ratios to drop by 38 percent, DAT said.
The national average van rate fell 5 cents from the prior week to $1.68 per mile, which included a 1-cent decline in the average fuel surcharge, triggered by declining oil and fuel prices, DAT said. Spot rates are quoted to shippers on an "all-in" basis, which combines the base rate and prevailing fuel surcharge.
The refrigerated and flatbed spot markets didn't fare much better. "Reefer" load posts dropped 26 percent from the prior week, while truck posts jumped 22 percent, resulting a 39-percent fall in the load-to-truck ratio. The national average reefer rate dropped 6 cents, to $1.90 per mile, which included a 1-cent drop in the fuel surcharge. Flatbed loads held steady but available capacity increased 27 percent, resulting in a 21-percent decline in the load-to-truck ratio, DAT said. Average flatbed rates edged 2 cents down, to $1.90 per mile.
The DAT numbers come less than a week after investment firm Avondale Partners and audit and payment concern Cass Information Systems published their monthly truckload line-haul index, a measure of changes in per-mile line-haul rates that exclude fuel surcharges and accessorial fees. That data showed a scant 1.1-percent increase in December from year-earlier levels. This followed gains in October and November of 1.9 percent and 1.6 percent, respectively, the firms said.
What's more, spot rates decreased last month to levels not seen since 2009, a bothersome sign for contract pricing since spot market prices generally lead contract pricing, which accounts for as much as three-quarters of the enormous U.S. truckload market.
Avondale has forecast average contract rate increases this year of between 1and 3 percent, well below what carriers may have been expecting during most of 2015, when contract rates did the unusual and rose as spot rates fell. In what could turn out to be an understatement, Avondale said that "current spot market weakness have lasted long enough to begin to be troubling." Ben Cubitt, senior vice president of consulting and engineering for Transplace, a large third-party logistics (3PL) provider based in Frisco, Texas, agreed that shippers can now negotiate favorable rates. However, Cubitt said the current climate will likely not last forever, and any user that tries to kick a carrier when it's down will do so at its own peril.
Much has been made of the slowdown in the macroeconomy, which has hit end demand. Most of the decline has been felt in the industrial sector, normally the province of less-than-truckload (LTL) carriers. But retail did not burn the barn over the holidays, and that could be affecting truckload carriers as well. Another culprit in the drop in spot rates is the extraordinary decline in diesel prices, mirroring the sharp fall in oil prices. On Tuesday, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) said in its weekly report that average on-highway national diesel prices dropped 7 cents a gallon, to $2.11 per gallon, the lowest national average price since the worst of the Great Recession in March 2009. The price declines caused fuel surcharges, which are mostly pegged to the EIA data, to be adjusted downward, leading in part to the fall in spot rates.
A third factor could be the current relative abundance in capacity, defying the multiyear projections of shrinkage in rigs and drivers. Net new orders—new orders minus cancellations—of heavy-duty "class 8" tractors hit 28,150 units in December, the best monthly numbers for an otherwise subpar year since February, according to consultancy ACT Research. The big winners were dual-driver "sleeper" tractors, which had their best production and order year ever, ACT said. Trailer deliveries also set a record in 2015, ACT said.
December orders are generally placed by big truckers looking to get their replacement requirements in order ahead of the new year, according to Kenny Vieth, ACT's president. The deliveries will be spread evenly throughout the four quarters, he said in an e-mail yesterday
But the year-end buying binge may be the last feast for a while, according to ACT. "With excess freight-hauling capacity and slowing freight growth, freight rates have softened to the point where many truckers are now taking a wait-and-see approach before committing to more new equipment," Steve Tam, ACT's vice president, commercial vehicle sector, said in a statement that accompanied the final December tractor net-order figures.
In an interesting twist, Peggy Dorf, a market analyst for DAT, said that truckers may have used their significant savings from the decline in fuel prices to invest in new rigs. The firm did not immediately show data to support that claim, however.
As for drivers, the wild card may be how many—if any—oilfield workers who may have been laid off in the wake of the decline in domestic shale-oil and gas drilling activity choose to transition into the trucking sector, which is still looking at a significant shortage of qualified drivers in the next few years.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."