Top four capabilities to look for in your GTM platform in 2016
Change is a constant in international trade. Make sure your global trade management software includes these four capabilities, and you'll be ready to meet the latest requirements.
Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
Managing import and export transactions is a complex task for any company, as the rules of international trade and commerce seem to shift overnight with new treaties, taxes, embargoes, and security requirements.
Many shippers, carriers, customs brokers, and freight forwarders rely on global trade management (GTM) software to navigate these fast-changing rules, avoid penalties for trading with prohibited partners, and ensure they qualify for every available exemption from tariffs.
The challenge will only grow more complex in 2016 as waves of change roil the international landscape, from treaties such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) on track for approval in the coming year to the loosening of embargoes such as Iran's July agreement to cap its nuclear enrichment activities in exchange for the lifting of financial sanctions.
Importers, exporters, and other GTM software users can save time, money, and labor by automating the day-to-day operational tasks associated with international trade and regulatory compliance. But these products can also help them to address some of the "big picture" issues they are likely to encounter today. Here are four broad capabilities that any GTM platform should offer customers to help them tackle the changing requirements of international trade in 2016.
EXPANDED SECURITY COMPLIANCE
The set of legislative controls affecting international shipping has grown significantly broader than traditional import and export declarations in the last 10 years, as mounting security concerns have led countries to place further restrictions on trading partners, sales of certain products and commodities, and their uses, said Evan Puzey, former chief marketing officer at Kewill. Accordingly, robust, comprehensive, and constantly updated security compliance capabilities are becoming increasingly important.
Businesses must comply with regulations such as denied-party screening, licensed goods determinations, and embargoed country lists. While these basic requirements have been around for decades, the pace of change continued to accelerate in 2015, and GTM software vendors have to keep their automated updates up to speed.
The volume and variety of restricted buyers, sellers, intermediaries, and locations is so great today that traders cannot efficiently stay in compliance with the laws without automation. To cover all the bases, a software provider like Kewill must monitor a whopping 238 lists, such as the FBI's "Ten Most Wanted" list and the Bank of England's financial sanctions list, Puzey said.
Other growing restrictions pertain to licensed goods that may appear innocent for commercial use, but could have illegal applications, such as titanium plumbing taps (whose lightweight metal could be repurposed for use in aircraft parts or armored vehicles) or snorkeling swim fins (which are crucial for naval combat swimmers). Companies trading in such goods must demonstrate "duty of care"—a legal obligation to exercise reasonable care in preventing harm that could result from their actions—in determining who is using the items and ensuring they are not repurposed.
Multiply that level of precision tracking and control by the roughly 190 countries in a global company's shipping network—including those in the increasingly volatile Middle East, Eastern Europe, and Africa—and it's clear that businesses need security compliance help from GTM software more than ever.
CLOUD-BASED UPDATES
Keeping up with this level of complexity demands a software platform that is updated several times a day with dozens of changes, which is a level of software maintenance far beyond the typical standard of support required for desktop or enterprise applications.
Many GTM software suppliers meet this demand by building their platforms on the software-as-a-service (SaaS) model, hosting the application on remote, cloud-based servers so customers can simply log in to use them, said Chad Singiser, senior sales executive at Descartes.
This approach shifts the burden of making frequent software updates to the IT provider, and allows users to concentrate on their core shipping business.
FLEXIBILITY TO ADAPT TO TPP AND OTHER PACTS
Most experts agree the TPP is on track for eventual ratification, with member countries standing to participate in one of the biggest free trade agreements in history. Despite this outlook, the deal is still in the ratification stages, which prevents both governments and international traders from preparing for specific regulations until it becomes law in all affected countries.
Facing this uncertain future, importers and exporters will likely find the best GTM for their business is one that has the flexibility to quickly incorporate the myriad changes as soon as TPP and other trade agreements become law. Companies armed with up-to-the-minute GTM software can take full advantage of complex trade pacts, claiming preferential treatment for their goods and trading partners so they can avoid paying expensive tariffs.
ABILITY TO CONNECT TO ERP SYSTEMS
Facing the growing challenges of importing and exporting goods in the global market, many shippers, carriers, customs brokers, and freight forwarders are outgrowing their previous approaches to handling trade compliance. Managing multilayered import and export transactions through a generic business software platform such as the company's enterprise resource planning (ERP), material resources planning, or transportation management system can be cumbersome, slow, and inefficient.
To stay current with evolving regulations, companies are increasingly looking to GTM platforms to improve their trade compliance process.
However, the complexity of modern international trade means that a mature GTM platform can no longer work as a single-point solution, focused merely on automating paperwork. Instead, it must take on a product management role, merging the competing demands of imports, exports, tariffs, and laws, said Anthony Hardenburgh, vice president of global trade content at Amber Road.
Without visibility into the impact of international tariffs, a company can easily lose track of a given product's total landed cost (the manufactured cost of an item combined with the cost of delivering it to the intended market), Hardenburgh said. In one example, a U.S. laptop retailer tried to sell $2,500 computers to consumers in São Paulo, Brazil, but failed to realize that taxes and duties added another $2,000 to the sticker price. The final cost was so high it had to abandon the project.
To avoid these pitfalls, a GTM system should be able to tie in to the full range of the user's ERP systems, combining information drawn from software silos such as import, export, transportation, and procurement applications.
The global trade network is changing fast, with ever-more-complex regulations for logistics practitioners. A GTM software platform with these four broad capabilities can be a crucial tool for users as they seek to ship cargo around the world at high speed and low cost.
There's an app for that
Looking for software to help you manage complex import/export processes? Here are some of the vendors that offer GTM applications:
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.