Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration today finalized a rule requiring electronic logging devices (ELDs) be installed in virtually all commercial motor vehicles by the end of 2017, ending a five-year legal and regulatory battle that still has some in the industry concerned about how small operators will comply with the rule's costs and stay in business.
FMCSA, a subagency of the Department of Transportation, said the rule applies digital technology to a traditionally manual process to improve compliance with federal hours-of-service regulations designed to prevent driver fatigue. The rule phases out the 77-year practice of using paper logs to track driver on- and off-duty times.
An ELD automatically records driving time. It monitors engine hours, vehicle movement, miles driven, and location information. It does not track a driver's personal whereabouts. Truckers that have already installed ELDs on a voluntary basis will have an additional two years past the initial phase to comply with the new regulations. FMCSA estimated the average annualized per-vehicle cost of a basic ELD—one that would satisfy its mandate—at $495.
The costs escalate from there, however. One carrier, which FMCSA did not identify, told the agency it spent more than $100,000 a year to install, maintain, monitor, and replace ELDs for its fleet of 200 trucks. That expense didn't include the costs of downtime when an ELD wasn't working, or any penalties and inactivity at a job site because a load wasn't delivered on time, the carrier told the agency.
The final rule, which came down as had been generally expected, is one of several government mandates that could lead to significant driver and rig attrition due to the compliance costs of each. Although the supply-demand scales are today roughly in balance, analysts expect capacity to significantly tighten in two to three years as the financial burdens of rules like ELD compliance force many smaller operators, the backbone of the nation's truck fleet, to exit the business. This, in turn, will result in a meaningful increase in freight rates, according to various analysts.
DOT officials hailed the rule as heralding a new and improved era in highway safety and efficiency. "Since 1938, complex, on-duty/off-duty logs for truck and bus drivers were made with pencil and paper, virtually impossible to verify," said U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx in a statement. "This automated technology not only brings logging records into the modern age, it also allows roadside safety inspectors to unmask violations of federal law that put lives at risk."
The rule will save, on average, 26 lives and prevent 562 injuries per year caused by crashes involving large commercial motor vehicles, FMCSA said. It will generate annual net benefits of $1 billion, largely by reducing the amount of required industry paperwork, the agency said. For example, in most cases a carrier would not be forced to retain supporting documents verifying a driver's on-duty driving time, the agency said. The switch to digital records will also make it faster and easier for roadside law-enforcement personnel to review driver records, FMCSA said.
Addressing concerns by groups like the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA), which represents about 150,000 independent drivers, that trucking firms could use the technology to micromanage and ultimately harass drivers, FMCSA said "strict protections" of drivers are embedded in the rule to insulate them from harassment.
The ELD rulemaking process had been in legal limbo since August 2011, when a federal appeals court froze the original 2010 FMCSA rule on grounds it didn't do enough to protect drivers from the possibility of harassment by fleet owners and operators. The original rule was set to take effect in mid-2012, but the court's order returning the rule to the FMCSA upended that timetable.
The new rule establishes technology specifications detailing ELD performance and design requirements so manufacturers can produce compliant devices and systems, FMCSA said. The rule permits smart phones and other wireless devices to be used as ELDs if they satisfy technical specifications, are certified, and are listed on an FMCSA website, the agency said. Canada- and Mexico-domiciled drivers will be required to use ELDs when operating on U.S. roadways.
The American Trucking Associations (ATA), which represents large trucking firms, some of whom have already installed ELDs across their fleets, called the rule a "historic step forward" for the industry. "This regulation will change the trucking industry—for the better—forever," Bill Graves, ATA's president and CEO, said in a statement. "An already safe and efficient industry will get more so with the aid of this proven technology."
OOIDA, which has argued the rules do virtually nothing to improve highway safety while laying onerous cost and process burdens on smaller carriers, repeated its concerns in an e-mailed statement. "We know of no technology that automatically tracks a driver's record-of-duty status, and so ELDs will not be able to verify compliance with hours-of-service regulations," OOIDA said. "ELDs can only track (the) movement of a truck and approximate location, not a driver's work status, which requires input from the driver." The group added that it will be "interested to learn the specifics on how the agency intends to deal with the issue of harassment."
Critics of the FMCSA proposal contend that fleets will not only confront the costs of buying hardware and software, but will also face a productivity hit as they adapt their systems and processes to the new technology. Various groups said in comments to the FMCSA that truckers have dramatically improved their safety performance and that there was no need for a costly rule. OOIDA said the rule's costs could be the "proverbial straw that breaks the camel's back."
The group also expressed concern that the rule did not address whether a driver or a carrier contracting out the driver's services should bear the cost of paying for mandatory ELD use. In response, FMCSA said its mission is to promote highway safety and that it would be the private sector's responsibility to sort out the cost issues. The agency said, however, that fleets that buy ELDs in bulk could pass any volume savings on to their driver contractors. It also noted that overall costs could decline as companies comply with the mandate and the technology gains wider acceptance.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."