Merger and acquisition activity among North American third-party logistics (3PL) providers will likely continue as acquiring firms look to defend their market share in an ongoing climate of consolidation, according to Northeastern University's 22nd annual survey of top 3PL executives.
The survey, which polled 30 CEOs of multinational 3PLs, found that several North American executives expected their companies to become acquisition targets. The executives weren't identified in keeping with the longstanding tradition of maintaining strict confidentiality. Of the 30 executives, 15 were from North America, 10 from Europe, and five from the Asia-Pacific region. Given the sizes of the companies they lead, the executives polled have their collective pulse on billions of dollars of transport and logistics spending.
Only three of the 10 European executives said M&A activity has affected their business. However, several said that Greenwich, Conn.-based XPO Logistics Inc.'s US$3.5 billion acquisition in April of French transport and logistics firm Norbert Dentressangle S.A., will likely have a profound impact on the continent's 3PL landscape.
This was the first time in the survey's history that M&A made the short list of European 3PL executives' main concerns, according to Dr. Robert C. Lieb, professor of supply chain management at Boston-based Northeastern. Lieb conducted the research for the survey, which was sponsored by 3PL Penske Logistics.
The respondents said the merger wave is being driven by providers' desire to increase scale and broaden global service offerings. It is also being aided by the availability of inexpensive capital, as interest rates remain historically low and liquidity reasonably abundant. "More customers are asking for 'one-stop' service beginning from design and production to delivery and reverse logistics," said Joseph Carlier, senior vice president of global sales for Penske Logistics, in a recent interview with CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly, DC Velocity's sister publication. "This is not just a matter of scale. The question for us is: How do we extend our product offerings on a strategic level?"/
The study's primary goal is to query 3PL CEOs about industry challenges, opportunities, and market dynamics, as well as profitability and revenue growth for individual 3PLs and for the regional industry. The key issues cited by executives are often specific to their regions. For example, North American executives cite issues such as the shortage of qualified commercial truck drivers, productivity concerns at U.S. West Coast ports, and the trend toward nearshoring of manufacturing. European executives are most concerned about Russian economic sanctions, more emphasis on 3PL alliances in developing countries, and an inflexible workforce. Asia-Pacific executives emphasized the steady growth of intra-Asia trade, infrastructure problems in developing countries, and economic developments in China.
However, three stood out as near-universal concerns: The impact of M&A, e-commerce, and new sources of competition. In North America, e-commerce accounts for about 12 percent of 3PL revenues on average, and respondents forecast that will grow to 21 percent in three years. European respondents generate some 5 percent of their revenues from e-commerce clients, which they expect to grow to 9 percent in three years. In the Asia-Pacific, e-commerce revenues now account for 10 percent of the 3PL revenue base, and the CEOs forecast that will more than double to about 24 percent in three years.
Accordingly, the 3PLs are taking steps to boost their ability to serve e-commerce clients. Respondents in all regions said they are upgrading their information technology to support this business segment. Many are investing in physical infrastructure, such as heavily automated distribution centers. North American respondents also mentioned that they are developing dedicated e-commerce operations and linked technology as well as expanded e-commerce consulting. Europeans are establishing new locations for consumers to pick up packages and are expanding international operations and value-added warehousing for e-commerce clients. Those in Asia-Pacific also are focusing on integrating domestic and international warehousing services and adding rapid delivery, parcel, and high-volume returns services to their portfolios.
E-commerce is bringing 3PLs into direct competition with the likes of Seattle-based Amazon.com, Chinese e-commerce firm Alibaba, and the San Francisco-based car service Uber. Six North American CEOs and four of the Europeans cited Uber, which is in talks with major retailers to provide delivery services, as a potential threat in the "last mile" delivery segment, Lieb said. A key question is whether Uber would be subject to the regulatory requirements that currently apply to 3PLs, parcel companies, and motor carriers, according to Carlier of Penske Logistics.
Respondents also identified Amazon as a competitive threat. When asked about Amazon's impact on the e-commerce marketplace, North American respondents mentioned an increased focus on same-day delivery, its expansion into multiple distribution channels, domination of small last-mile competitors, and the e-tailing and fulfillment giant generating so much volume in peak season that it can be difficult for others to get the services they need. European respondents said that Amazon is increasingly emphasizing same-day delivery, driving down transportation costs, and pressuring carriers to reduce cross-border premiums. At the same time, Amazon is developing more relationships with European 3PLs for last-mile delivery.
In Asia-Pacific, Alibaba is the big concern. Asked to identify Alibaba's impact on supply chain management in the region, respondents said the e-commerce behemoth provides customers with alternative methods of distribution for their products, offers consolidation services for small and medium-size businesses, and uses its market power to get lower rates from carriers, 3PLs, and government-owned warehouses. On the plus side, its last-mile delivery services have facilitated the rapid growth of e-commerce in the region, they said. None of the 3PLs involved in the survey provides services to Alibaba.
Overall, respondents were optimistic about the future, although not quite as bullish as they were last year, Lieb said. North American CEOs said the most important opportunities for 3PLs in their region are supporting the growth of nearshoring, expanding services for e-commerce businesses, retaining truck drivers, becoming more selective about markets served, going upstream in supply chains, and placing greater focus on intermodal services. In Europe, respondents said that 3PLs could bundle services for existing customers, support e-commerce sales, expand their global reach, focus on expanding into more profitable markets and trade lanes, provide data-management services to customers, and offer more services to small/medium customers. In Asia-Pacific, respondents mentioned the expansion of services in emerging markets, opportunities in health care, the provision of "lead logistics provider" services, assisting customers with network design, and bundling services for existing customers.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."