Merger and acquisition activity among North American third-party logistics (3PL) providers will likely continue as acquiring firms look to defend their market share in an ongoing climate of consolidation, according to Northeastern University's 22nd annual survey of top 3PL executives.
The survey, which polled 30 CEOs of multinational 3PLs, found that several North American executives expected their companies to become acquisition targets. The executives weren't identified in keeping with the longstanding tradition of maintaining strict confidentiality. Of the 30 executives, 15 were from North America, 10 from Europe, and five from the Asia-Pacific region. Given the sizes of the companies they lead, the executives polled have their collective pulse on billions of dollars of transport and logistics spending.
Only three of the 10 European executives said M&A activity has affected their business. However, several said that Greenwich, Conn.-based XPO Logistics Inc.'s US$3.5 billion acquisition in April of French transport and logistics firm Norbert Dentressangle S.A., will likely have a profound impact on the continent's 3PL landscape.
This was the first time in the survey's history that M&A made the short list of European 3PL executives' main concerns, according to Dr. Robert C. Lieb, professor of supply chain management at Boston-based Northeastern. Lieb conducted the research for the survey, which was sponsored by 3PL Penske Logistics.
The respondents said the merger wave is being driven by providers' desire to increase scale and broaden global service offerings. It is also being aided by the availability of inexpensive capital, as interest rates remain historically low and liquidity reasonably abundant. "More customers are asking for 'one-stop' service beginning from design and production to delivery and reverse logistics," said Joseph Carlier, senior vice president of global sales for Penske Logistics, in a recent interview with CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly, DC Velocity's sister publication. "This is not just a matter of scale. The question for us is: How do we extend our product offerings on a strategic level?"/
The study's primary goal is to query 3PL CEOs about industry challenges, opportunities, and market dynamics, as well as profitability and revenue growth for individual 3PLs and for the regional industry. The key issues cited by executives are often specific to their regions. For example, North American executives cite issues such as the shortage of qualified commercial truck drivers, productivity concerns at U.S. West Coast ports, and the trend toward nearshoring of manufacturing. European executives are most concerned about Russian economic sanctions, more emphasis on 3PL alliances in developing countries, and an inflexible workforce. Asia-Pacific executives emphasized the steady growth of intra-Asia trade, infrastructure problems in developing countries, and economic developments in China.
However, three stood out as near-universal concerns: The impact of M&A, e-commerce, and new sources of competition. In North America, e-commerce accounts for about 12 percent of 3PL revenues on average, and respondents forecast that will grow to 21 percent in three years. European respondents generate some 5 percent of their revenues from e-commerce clients, which they expect to grow to 9 percent in three years. In the Asia-Pacific, e-commerce revenues now account for 10 percent of the 3PL revenue base, and the CEOs forecast that will more than double to about 24 percent in three years.
Accordingly, the 3PLs are taking steps to boost their ability to serve e-commerce clients. Respondents in all regions said they are upgrading their information technology to support this business segment. Many are investing in physical infrastructure, such as heavily automated distribution centers. North American respondents also mentioned that they are developing dedicated e-commerce operations and linked technology as well as expanded e-commerce consulting. Europeans are establishing new locations for consumers to pick up packages and are expanding international operations and value-added warehousing for e-commerce clients. Those in Asia-Pacific also are focusing on integrating domestic and international warehousing services and adding rapid delivery, parcel, and high-volume returns services to their portfolios.
E-commerce is bringing 3PLs into direct competition with the likes of Seattle-based Amazon.com, Chinese e-commerce firm Alibaba, and the San Francisco-based car service Uber. Six North American CEOs and four of the Europeans cited Uber, which is in talks with major retailers to provide delivery services, as a potential threat in the "last mile" delivery segment, Lieb said. A key question is whether Uber would be subject to the regulatory requirements that currently apply to 3PLs, parcel companies, and motor carriers, according to Carlier of Penske Logistics.
Respondents also identified Amazon as a competitive threat. When asked about Amazon's impact on the e-commerce marketplace, North American respondents mentioned an increased focus on same-day delivery, its expansion into multiple distribution channels, domination of small last-mile competitors, and the e-tailing and fulfillment giant generating so much volume in peak season that it can be difficult for others to get the services they need. European respondents said that Amazon is increasingly emphasizing same-day delivery, driving down transportation costs, and pressuring carriers to reduce cross-border premiums. At the same time, Amazon is developing more relationships with European 3PLs for last-mile delivery.
In Asia-Pacific, Alibaba is the big concern. Asked to identify Alibaba's impact on supply chain management in the region, respondents said the e-commerce behemoth provides customers with alternative methods of distribution for their products, offers consolidation services for small and medium-size businesses, and uses its market power to get lower rates from carriers, 3PLs, and government-owned warehouses. On the plus side, its last-mile delivery services have facilitated the rapid growth of e-commerce in the region, they said. None of the 3PLs involved in the survey provides services to Alibaba.
Overall, respondents were optimistic about the future, although not quite as bullish as they were last year, Lieb said. North American CEOs said the most important opportunities for 3PLs in their region are supporting the growth of nearshoring, expanding services for e-commerce businesses, retaining truck drivers, becoming more selective about markets served, going upstream in supply chains, and placing greater focus on intermodal services. In Europe, respondents said that 3PLs could bundle services for existing customers, support e-commerce sales, expand their global reach, focus on expanding into more profitable markets and trade lanes, provide data-management services to customers, and offer more services to small/medium customers. In Asia-Pacific, respondents mentioned the expansion of services in emerging markets, opportunities in health care, the provision of "lead logistics provider" services, assisting customers with network design, and bundling services for existing customers.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."