Ben Ames has spent 20 years as a journalist since starting out as a daily newspaper reporter in Pennsylvania in 1995. From 1999 forward, he has focused on business and technology reporting for a number of trade journals, beginning when he joined Design News and Modern Materials Handling magazines. Ames is author of the trail guide "Hiking Massachusetts" and is a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism.
Omnichannel distribution was one of the hottest trends in the retail sector this year, with companies across the industry rushing to combine their e-commerce fulfillment operations with those for brick-and-mortar store sales.
Retailers have adopted a wide variety of approaches when it comes to omnichannel fulfillment. Some fill orders placed by online customers by pulling items directly from retail shelves, others run separate fulfillment operations for e-commerce and store replenishment orders, while still others combine these operations, using a single DC to fulfill e-commerce orders, replenish retail stores, and ship wholesale orders.
Despite success stories at companies like clothing retailer Abercrombie & Fitch and department store chain Dillard's Inc., not all omnichannel operations are revenue rockets. In fact, many companies struggle to run their omnichannel operations at a profit.
"Omnichannel is absolutely being done, although it's taking up lots of resources and probably not being done as profitably as many of us would like," said Jason Denmon, apparel and specialty retail industry leader at the distribution consulting and design engineering firm Fortna Inc. So what can retailers do to change that? We asked some experts for their advice.
TARGET YOUR EFFORTS
The first step in fine-tuning an omnichannel operation so that it runs more profitably is to identify which fulfillment flow the company wants to optimize, Denmon said. No single company can do it all, so it helps to target investment in one place, such as tracking truck routes within its own fleet, choosing a reliable third-party logistics (3PL) partner, or shipping parcels with an overnight carrier.
"Some firms do 'buy online, pick up from store'; some do 'buy online, ship from store.' You need to monitor whichever fulfillment flow you're using, and go back and optimize that," said Denmon.
For example, some retailers offer free shipping for home goods and bulky items ordered online if the customer is willing to pick them up from the store. Such a retailer might save money on omnichannel operations if it adjusted its truck routes to make sure each shipment leaving the warehouse was a full truckload.
THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS FREE SHIPPING
A second crucial step for boosting the profitability of your omnichannel operation is to set realistic shipping fees.
That can be difficult in a market where online retailers compete for customers by offering free shipping or next-day delivery. But companies that sell $10 items can seldom make a profit shipping one or two units to an online buyer's home. Shipping costs will simply wipe out their profit margins.
That's led some retailers to adopt a more nuanced, choice-based approach. "The more progressive retailers have changed their website designs to communicate options to customers and give them choices," Denmon said. "For example, you can have it shipped for free and wait three to five days, or you can upgrade and get it tomorrow. They let the customer choose what speed is worth."
A variation on that scenario has been playing out in the U.K., where some online grocers have begun charging a fee for their "click and collect" programs, where online shoppers place food orders at home, then pick them up in person at the nearest supermarket.
However, that model has met with some resistance. The grocers are simply charging for their picking and packing services, but many customers have been outraged because they've become accustomed to free shipping, said David Jefferys, global market leader for e-commerce and omnichannel at KUKA Swisslog.
"Same-day service is a race to the bottom," Jefferys said. "The service level has to increase with a cost. There's no win-win that leads to an increase in service level without an increase in cost."
OUTSOURCING OMNICHANNEL OPERATIONS
Many retailers have been paying for shipping all along, whether they charge their e-commerce customers or not. But that means they have to find some way to offset that hidden cost. A number of brick-and-mortar retailers have used funds from other departments to subsidize the cost of building out their omnichannel fulfillment operations, Jefferys said. That accounting may work fine for the launch, but as e-commerce begins to account for a larger share of total revenue, the operation becomes more expensive and tougher to justify.
Faced with that reality, many companies have chosen to outsource their e-commerce fulfillment to a major third-party logistics service provider (3PL) such as DHL International, said Jefferys. Huge retailers like Amazon.com Inc. and Alibaba.com can afford to run their own distribution channels, but most of the smaller players need help with transportation and warehousing.
But even the major retailers are likely to face challenges when it comes to building a homegrown omnichannel operation. For example, there's the question of where to locate their operations. A company that builds a DC dedicated to e-commerce must decide whether it needs to provide one- or two-day delivery to customers' homes. That decision may affect whether it picks a warehouse located near Louisville, Ky., or Memphis, Tenn., depending on whether they're a UPS Inc. or a FedEx Corp. shop, said Marc Wulfraat, president of the Montreal-based consulting firm MWPVL International Inc.
Another challenge in building a successful omnichannel operation is balancing the demands of e-commerce with those of retail store operations. The primary function of physical storefronts is to serve as a showroom for the company's products and to allow sales associates to build relationships with customers. But a situation where workers are pulling inventory off store shelves even as live shoppers try to fill their carts is hardly conducive to relationship building. "Let's say a guy grabs the last box of your favorite cereal and he's wearing a Wal-Mart uniform," said Wulfraat. Chances are, the in-store shopper will be left feeling that the company values the e-commerce customer's business more than his or her own.
In addition to potentially offending shoppers, some retailers find that fulfilling e-commerce orders from stores is simply inefficient, Wulfraat said. Store employees may find that it takes much longer to pick and pack specific items in a hectic retail environment than in a well-ordered warehouse.
Despite the challenges, big national retailers such as Macy's Inc., Target Brands Inc., and Wal-Mart continue to fill orders from stores, he said, setting the standard for running an omnichannel operation and keeping the pressure on their competitors.
As for what the future holds, it's anybody's guess. As a recent survey made clear (see "Study: Omnichannel retailers still fine-tuning fulfillment operations" in this issue), there are just two universal truths when it comes to omnichannel distribution: each company is adapting to the omnichannel challenge in its own way, and the future will continue to bring changes in fulfillment strategies and practices.
Autonomous forklift maker Cyngn is deploying its DriveMod Tugger model at COATS Company, the largest full-line wheel service equipment manufacturer in North America, the companies said today.
By delivering the self-driving tuggers to COATS’ 150,000+ square foot manufacturing facility in La Vergne, Tennessee, Cyngn said it would enable COATS to enhance efficiency by automating the delivery of wheel service components from its production lines.
“Cyngn’s self-driving tugger was the perfect solution to support our strategy of advancing automation and incorporating scalable technology seamlessly into our operations,” Steve Bergmeyer, Continuous Improvement and Quality Manager at COATS, said in a release. “With its high load capacity, we can concentrate on increasing our ability to manage heavier components and bulk orders, driving greater efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating delivery timelines.”
Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it follows another deployment of DriveMod Tuggers with electric automaker Rivian earlier this year.
Manufacturing and logistics workers are raising a red flag over workplace quality issues according to industry research released this week.
A comparative study of more than 4,000 workers from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia found that manufacturing and logistics workers say they have seen colleagues reduce the quality of their work and not follow processes in the workplace over the past year, with rates exceeding the overall average by 11% and 8%, respectively.
The study—the Resilience Nation report—was commissioned by UK-based regulatory and compliance software company Ideagen, and it polled workers in industries such as energy, aviation, healthcare, and financial services. The results “explore the major threats and macroeconomic factors affecting people today, providing perspectives on resilience across global landscapes,” according to the authors.
According to the study, 41% of manufacturing and logistics workers said they’d witnessed their peers hiding mistakes, and 45% said they’ve observed coworkers cutting corners due to apathy—9% above the average. The results also showed that workers are seeing colleagues take safety risks: More than a third of respondents said they’ve seen people putting themselves in physical danger at work.
The authors said growing pressure inside and outside of the workplace are to blame for the lack of diligence and resiliency on the job. Internally, workers say they are under pressure to deliver more despite reduced capacity. Among the external pressures, respondents cited the rising cost of living as the biggest problem (39%), closely followed by inflation rates, supply chain challenges, and energy prices.
“People are being asked to deliver more at work when their resilience is being challenged by economic and political headwinds,” Ideagen’s CEO Ben Dorks said in a statement announcing the findings. “Ultimately, this is having a determinantal impact on business productivity, workplace health and safety, and the quality of work produced, as well as further reducing the resilience of the nation at large.”
Respondents said they believe technology will eventually alleviate some of the stress occurring in manufacturing and logistics, however.
“People are optimistic that emerging tech and AI will ultimately lighten the load, but they’re not yet feeling the benefits,” Dorks added. “It’s a gap that now, more than ever, business leaders must look to close and support their workforce to ensure their staff remain safe and compliance needs are met across the business.”
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.