Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Segments of the U.S. transportation industry have been swimming upstream for most of 2015, and events over the past five days don't give any indication that the water levels are receding.
After the financial markets closed Monday, Roadrunner Transportation Systems Inc., a Cudahy, Wis.-based asset-light—think control of assets but not ownership— provider of less-than-truckload (LTL), truckload, and intermodal services, shocked everyone by posting third-quarter revenue and income results well below analysts' estimates. Traders and investors responded Tuesday by cutting the company's market capitalization almost in half, sending shares down nearly $9 a share over Monday's closing levels. Prices rose fractionally on Wednesday.
Today, Saia Inc., the Johns Creek, Ga.-based LTL and truckload carrier, a highly regarded player, posted third-quarter results that pleased no one. Revenues year-over-year dropped 4.6 percent, operating income was down 27 percent, shipments and tonnage fell 4.2 and 7.6 percent, respectively, and operating ratio—a ratio of revenues to expenses and a key measure of a business' ability to operate profitably—rose nearly 2 percentage points, to 93.7. That's not the direction Saia wants it to go. But an increase in driver wages—a reality for all trucking companies in an environment where qualified drivers are at a premium—took costs up, which, in turn, raised the operating ratio. On a per-ton basis, labor costs rose 15.8 percent in the quarter, to $157 a ton, according to a report from BB&T Capital Markets, an investment firm. Saia shares closed Wednesday at $23.86, down $6.29 a share.
Last Friday, Swift Transportation Co., the largest truckload carrier by sales, reported a 1-percent third-quarter decline in year-over-year operating revenue, a drop it blamed on the impact of declining fuel surcharges. Phoenix-based Swift, whose truck count in the third quarter rose by 831 trucks over 2014 levels, said it will end up adding 500 to 600 trucks by the end of 2015, down from its initial projections of 700 to 1,100 trucks. This means no more new equipment for the foreseeable future, and possibly reductions in rigs, Swift CEO Jerry Moyes told analysts. Swift's shares have been priced within a narrow range this week.
The biggest carrier of them all, UPS Inc., on Tuesday reported a decline in its core U.S. ground package volume in the third quarter, its first year-over-year drop in the category since the first quarter of 2011. Atlanta-based UPS attributed the decline to "slow industrial production" activity that hit business-to-business shipping activity. Business-to-consumer traffic, propelled by burgeoning e-commerce demand, rose from the same period a year ago. Otherwise, the company posted decent quarterly results. As of midday Wednesday, UPS stock had dropped nearly 5 percent from its close on Monday.
ECONOMIC DOWNSHIFT
While each company had its unique story to tell, the common thread was that transport companies are being impacted by a U.S. economy that has shifted into lower gear as the year has progressed. For carriers with LTL exposure, September was not a good month, and October, from anecdotal evidence, hasn't been much better. Roadrunner's third-quarter volumes, which historically start slow and finish strong, started slow but never got going. Its truckload traffic, heavily weighted toward refrigerated food items, was hurt by lower poultry, beef, and produce demand. LTL, which accounts for about 25 to 30 percent of the company's mix, was hit by a weak manufacturing climate and what management said was "aggressive pricing," language that seemed surprising—and which no one else is seeing, given the LTL industry's four-year track record of disciplined pricing measures following by a bout of disastrous rate-cutting during and after the Great Recession. Roadrunner also said its intermodal volumes were affected by lower-than-expected activity at the West Coast ports, and noncontractual pricing was pressured by excess truck capacity. The company said it expects no rebound in the current quarter.
At Saia, the story was somewhat better, but not by much. President and CEO Rick O'Dell called the results "disappointing" and blamed "declining tonnage trends" that made it hard to offset the impact of higher driver wages. The company said it also incurred higher costs relating to self-insurance claims. The one bright spot was a 2.2-percent increase in revenue per hundredweight, the revenue a carrier generates for each 100 pounds of freight hauled and a key metric of the success of its pricing strategy. Saia posted the gain despite the headwind of lower fuel surcharges, which depress carrier revenues.
For Saia, "the real test will be in the coming quarters if industry yields can weather further weakness in freight," said David G. Ross, analyst at investment firm Stifel, in a note today. Although 2016 should be a better year for Saia, the company is currently "running up a down escalator" given reduced volume levels, Ross said.
For truck users, the saving grace is that the always-imminent capacity crunch has been put off yet again. Truck space is readily available in most markets, and there is little upward movement in spot and contract rates. But that may be for the wrong reason. "The (U.S.) economy is much weaker than most people realize," Michael P. Regan, founder of TranzAct Technologies Inc., a consultancy and audit firm based in Elmhurst, Ill., said today at the "Value Creation 2015" conference in Chicago sponsored by consultancy Armstrong and Associates Inc. Regan said he was told by a major client, whom he described as a Fortune 50 company, that it expects a recession in the U.S. to start sometime in 2016.
Ross, in a separate note today, said an industrial recession in the U.S. may have already begun, a broad trend which will hurt railroads and LTL carriers, the latter having benefited from truckload-carrier overflow that has evaporated. By contrast, Ross noted that the consumer seems to be in good shape. Jobs and wages are growing, and lower gasoline prices should add to consumers' discretionary spending.
OVERSTOCK TO THE RESCUE?
There is near-term hope for the LTL industry, according to YRC Freight, the long-haul LTL unit of YRC Worldwide Inc. In a note on its website, the carrier noted—as many others have—that many U.S. businesses are sitting on excess inventory, the result of overly optimistic projections of consumer demand and the lingering impact of the West Coast port slowdown earlier in the year, when delayed shipments arrived at stores after the spring and early summer seasons, leaving retailers with overstocks that no one wanted.
In this environment, businesses will be vigilant in managing their inventories, and will order in smaller quantities but do so more frequently, according to YRC Freight. This type of behavior, if it materializes, will be tailored to the capabilities of LTL carriers, YRC said.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."