Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
In September 2012, DC Velocityspent a day with Saddle Creek Logistics Services, an asset-based third-party logistics service provider (3PL) that had made one of the biggest commitments of any for-hire trucker to compressed natural gas (CNG) trucks. At the time, diesel fuel prices hovered around $4 a gallon, well above CNG prices. Michael J. DelBovo, president of the Lakeland, Fla.-based company's transport division, predicted that level would be the long-term price floor for diesel.
Three years later, the floor has given way. As of Nov. 30, the average national price of a gallon of on-highway diesel stood at $2.42, according to weekly data published by the Department of Energy's Energy Information Administration (EIA). On the Gulf Coast, which generally reports the lowest diesel prices of the nine regions tracked by EIA, the average price stood at $2.25 a gallon. Through mid-year, the drop in diesel lagged behind the sharp declines in the prices of the two types of oil traded on world markets: West Texas Intermediate (WTI) and Brené North Sea crude. In recent months, however, diesel has caught up—or down—in a big way.
In an interview a couple months back, DelBovo said he anticipated the oil-price volatility but underestimated the duration of its decline. He's not alone; a near-universal misread of the longevity of the downward move led to the coinage of the term "lower for longer."
Faced with a sudden and dramatic change in the macro environment, DelBovo tweaked the company's operating model. He eliminated a "fast fill" approach to fueling its 200 natural gas trucks in favor of a "time fill" method, under which gas is slowly dispensed from on-site compressors into the trucks. The "time fill" method fills an engine more completely because the gas has time to adjust to its surroundings inside the tank. The company then established filling "zones," where trucks were time-filled in rotation rather than all at once. This optimized tractor utilization by keeping more of the rigs on the road while others were being refueled, according to the company. Through these steps, Saddle Creek Transportation boosted its CNG utilization by about 10 percent, DelBovo said.
The company will take delivery of 50 new tractors by year's end. But they will run on a mix of 70 percent CNG and 30 percent diesel, and will cost less than tractors that run exclusively on CNG. At least 20 of the tractors will be financed in part through incentives from states like Florida, Georgia, and Texas to encourage investment in natural gas vehicles, DelBovo said. "We are taking advantage of every incentive out there to buy new trucks," he said.
Even with the steep drop in oil prices, the gap at the pump between diesel and CNG persists, thanks to natural gas's own price plunge. As of Dec. 2, natural gas was priced at $2.17 per million British thermal units (BTUs), down nearly $1.71 per million BTUs from the same time in 2014. The natural-gas price downdraft has kept a tight lid on CNG pump prices. Current prices at public fueling stations nationwide, and at company-owned stations in Lakeland and Fort Worth, Texas, range between $2.00 and $2.10 a gallon, according to Saddle Creek Transportation's estimates. They are lower at its own locations.
DelBovo said he remains confident in the unit's strategy. "This project is going to be successful even at the current prices for diesel and CNG," he said in the recent interview. Still, the initial projections of a four-year time frame for the gap between diesel and natural gas prices to overcome the upfront expense of CNG-powered vehicles have been pushed out to six years, he said.
SLAM-DUNK NO LONGER
The conversion from diesel fuel to natural gas, which seemed a no-brainer earlier in the decade, now requires some thought. A CNG-powered vehicle still costs tens of thousands of dollars more than a comparable new diesel truck, although economies of scale in production have helped cut the differential to $47,000 today from $85,000 to $95,000 per truck in 2007, according to Peter Grace, senior vice president for Clean Energy Fuels Corp., a Newport Beach, Calif.-based company that builds and manages infrastructure for CNG and liquefied natural gas (LNG) fueling.
Private fleets, dedicated contract carriers, and for-hire carriers that have committed to large-scale investments plan to see them through, confident that an eventual return to higher oil prices will bear out the wisdom of their strategy. By contrast, firms on the fence two or three years ago are either still straddling or have pulled back. "They are taking a wait-and-see approach," said Patti M. Murdock, a former transport executive at Cincinnati-based Procter and Gamble Co. and head of Clean Logistics Consulting, which advises companies on alternative energy solutions for transportation and logistics services.
Bill Renz, general manager of U.S. Gain, an Appleton, Wis.-based provider of CNG fueling and infrastructure services, said the drop in oil prices has put many fleet conversion plans on hold. But those already running on CNG continue to grow their fleets, Renz added. "In general, we've seen a shift from smaller fleets moving to CNG to much larger corporations making the move, so our overall growth hasn't slowed down," Renz said in an e-mail.
Those who are pressing forward are couching their investment in terms of environmental, rather than economic, benefits. Belgian brewing giant Anheuser-Busch InBev said in August it was replacing its St. Louis tractor fleet of 97 diesel-powered rigs with CNG-powered rigs. Last year, the company switched out its entire Houston-based fleet of 66 diesel tractors for CNG. (Approximately 30 percent of Anheuser over-the-road tractors now run on natural gas.) In its statement announcing the changes in St. Louis, Anheuser emphasized the value of reducing greenhouse-gas emissions. There was no mention of cost savings.
Shippers that aggressively pushed their carrier partners to convert to natural gas when oil prices were higher have since backed off. Spending on the refueling infrastructure has slowed so far this year, though a huge project backlog from 2014 ensured that work would continue in earnest well into 2015. As a result, the one component long seen as the biggest impediment to the growth of the CNG heavy-duty truck market is in better shape now than it has ever been, Murdock said.
Sales of big CNG rigs during 2015 have been roughly on par with 2014 levels, but that's considered a victory of sorts considering how the sharp decline in oil prices could have deflated CNG's value proposition. Cummins Inc., one of the manufacturers of the 12-liter CNG engines used by heavy-duty fleets, will sell 3,000 to 3,500 engine units this year, about the same as last year, according to William Zobel, vice president, market development and strategy, for Trillium CNG, a Salt Lake City-based fueling-services and filling-station-design company. "The market is still maintaining momentum" despite unfavorable macro trends, Zobel said in a phone interview.
Those involved in the CNG space remain optimistic, believing natural gas's historical price stability (it has traded in a tight range for more than a decade, except for late 2005 after hurricanes Katrina and Rita shut down Gulf Coast supply lines, and mid-2008, when all energy prices spiked), its environmental benefits, and its abundant domestic production will remain appealing factors. Private fleets and dedicated carriers remain committed to CNG, they contend. "The feedback we're getting is that they're all in," said Grace of Clean Energy.
Then there is the price of oil itself: Most in the CNG field are biding their time, confident that oil and fuel prices will eventually rise, and, if there is a supply shock due to unrest anywhere in the oil-producing world, that the increase will be violent. Over the last eight years, which include the sharp fall in the past 16 months, diesel prices have averaged $3.44 a gallon, according to Grace.
Still, the best guess is that, barring unexpected events, oil prices will stay around current levels—or perhaps go lower—for the next year or two. That has led DelBovo of Saddle Creek Transportation to engage in unconventional thinking. "I'm probably the only person in America hoping for oil prices to rise," he mused.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."