Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Amazon.com Inc. has begun the process of assembling a high-level executive team to lead the company's push to develop its own transportation network, according to a person familiar with its strategy and planned execution.
The person, who asked to remain anonymous, said Seattle-based Amazon will announce plans to launch its shipping infrastructure sometime in 2016, though no firm time period has been discussed. Amazon has retained one of the world's leading recruitment firms to identify senior executives within the small-package industry, the person said. The individual declined to disclose the name of the firm, saying it does not want its identity revealed at this time.
The individual was told that Amazon will do "whatever it takes to serve every community" in the United States. The online retailer and fulfillment provider's objective is to guarantee delivery within a 90-minute to two-hour window, the individual was told by top executives at the recruiting firm.
Amazon plans to operate the service with its own equipment and will supplement it with purchased transportation services. It currently uses the U.S. Postal Service, UPS Inc., and FedEx Corp., as well as regional parcel carriers when they are needed.
The individual said that Amazon plans to continue using Atlanta-based UPS, though UPS may be reluctant to continue handling large volumes, given that the two may soon be going head to head. Amazon's relationship with Memphis-based FedEx has lessened in recent years; in its fiscal year 2015 annual report, FedEx reported that average daily volume for its "SmartPost" product, where it aggregates large-scale volumes for customers and inducts the shipments deep into the USPS network for "last-mile" delivery to residences, declined 6 percent "due to the reduction in volume from a major customer." FedEx didn't identify the customer, but those following the industry believed it to be Amazon.
Kelly Cheeseman, an Amazon spokeswoman, declined comment.
Amazon's desire to penetrate the transportation sector is not new. In early 2014, DC Velocity reported that Amazon was looking at ways it could fulfill and distribute orders through its own network rather than continue to rely on FedEx and UPS. At the time, it was reported that Amazon had divided the nation into three segments based on population size: The top 40 markets, which comprise about half of the U.S. population; the next 60 largest areas, which account for about 17 percent of the population; and the remaining areas, which account for about one-third of the population. The story indicated that Amazon was moving rapidly to develop the network, but gave no timetable.
In 2014, Amazon generated nearly $89 billion in net sales, defined as sales after deducting the costs of returns, allowances for damaged and missing goods, and any other allowable discounts. Of the total, $55.4 billion was generated in North America and the balance from sales across the rest of the world. Amazon, which launched in July 1994 as an online bookseller, has built a massive business selling a multitude of merchandise on its website, and providing fulfillment services to small and midsize merchants that lack the size and resources to manage those functions in house. Much of Amazon's shipping revenue comes from businesses that use it as an online storefront and a de facto third-party logistics provider.
In a research note yesterday, Colin Sebastian, Internet analyst at investment firm Robert W. Baird and Co. Inc., estimated the global fulfillment market presents a $400- to $450-billion opportunity for Amazon. In the note, Sebastian said Amazon might be the only company with the density and scale to compete globally against established transport and logistics providers. It also has an investor base that is "historically tolerant of large-scale investment and low-margin revenues," Sebastian said, a reference to Amazon's inability to become sustainably profitable despite significant year-over-year increases in revenue.
Sebastian said that Amazon, which currently operates 165 fulfillment centers worldwide, is testing "last mile" deliveries of products that are not sold on its own website.
One reason that Amazon may want to take more control of its logistics is that its escalating shipping costs continue to outstrip its shipping revenue. Shipping costs exceeded $8.7 billion in 2014, up from $6.6 billion in 2013. Meanwhile, shipping revenue in 2014 did not quite reach $4.48 billion—which nevertheless was a 45-percent increase over 2013 levels, according to information in Amazon's 2014 annual report. Increases in Amazon's shipping costs and revenues are seen as byproducts of the growing demand for its services.
From 2012 to 2014, the company's shipping revenue nearly doubled, while net shipping costs—the ratio of revenue to expenses—rose $1.4 billion over that time. Shipping costs as a percentage of net sales hit 9.8 percent in 2014, up from 8.9 percent in 2013, according to the annual report. (The figures exclude shipping revenue from third-party sellers that do not use Amazon for fulfillment.)
Another factor may be Amazon's desire to control its own distribution. It was critical of UPS' and FedEx's performance during the 2013 critical peak holiday shipping period, when an avalanche of Amazon packages hit both carriers' air networks two and three days before Christmas, resulting in late deliveries of millions of holiday packages. UPS' system was considerably more impacted than FedEx's.
In early 2014, Amazon told UPS and FedEx that it would re-evaluate its shipping options following the 2013 holiday fiasco, even though several observers blamed the snafus on Amazon's unrealistic fulfillment expectations given its acceptance of so many last-minute orders from customers. Terrible mid-December weather in the important Dallas-Fort Worth market added to the mess by creating bottlenecks across UPS' network that took weeks to completely resolve.
In response, Amazon has deepened its relationship with USPS, considered the low-cost delivery provider in the U.S. USPS provides Amazon with Sunday deliveries, among other things. Amazon has begun erecting fulfillment centers closer to its end-delivery markets to cut transportation expenses and speed time in transit. It also has been inducting more of its own parcels into the USPS network for last-mile deliveries and to lessen its reliance on UPS and FedEx to aggregate its parcels and perform the same service in conjunction with the postal service.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."