Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
For employees and customers of UTi Worldwide Inc., the uncertainty over its future as an independent entity appears to be over. For its shareholders, the misery of nearly a decade of the equity's massive underperformance also appears to be over. For the DSV Group, the Danish transport giant that has offered to buy the struggling contract logistics provider and freight forwarder for $1.35 billion in cash, the challenge of integrating an unprofitable company with nearly $4 billion in gross revenues is about to begin.
News of the purchase, approved by both boards and announced early this morning in the U.S., didn't come as a surprise. Both companies talked late last year about a deal but couldn't agree on a price. At the end of 2014, Long Beach, Calif.-based UTi's equity was trading at about $12 a share. As of yesterday's close, it was trading below $5 a share, about 34 percent below the agreed-upon purchase price of $7.01 a share. In mid-2006, UTi stock traded as high as $36 a share. The stock closed today at $7.13 a share, up $2.41 a share.
Given the dramatic decline in UTi's stock price this year, and confronting no immediate prospects for a recovery amidst weakness in global air and ocean traffic, it is doubtful UTi holders will oppose the deal; private equity firm P2 Capital Partners LLC, which owns 10.8 percent of UTi's common shares, said it supports the transaction.
The acquisition, scheduled to close in the first quarter of 2016, would create a US$13 billion company with 848 offices and 339 logistics facilities in 84 countries. About 61 percent of revenue would come from Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa; 17 percent from the Americas; 16 percent from the Asia-Pacific region, and 6 percent from sub-Saharan Africa, DSV said. The addition of UTi would give DSV, which generates more than half of its "net" revenue—revenue after the costs of purchased transportation—a deeper foothold in North America, a continent where it lacks a sizable presence, DSV said. About three-quarters of UTi's net revenue comes from the U.S., Asia, and South Africa.
DSV said the deal will significantly strengthen its air and ocean operations and will allow it to become a global contract logistics provider and expand into surface-transport activities beyond Europe. Contract logistics accounts for about $1.4 billion of UTi's annual revenue. UTi is strong in serving so-called vertical industries like health care, retail, and automotive, capabilities DSV said it would expand upon.
The $2.5-billion balance of UTi's total revenue comes from air and sea freight forwarding, a business that has long been commoditized and suffers from low yields and erratic demand. In an indication of the weakness in UTi's forwarding business, Benjamin J. Hartford, analyst for investment firm Robert W. Baird and Company Inc., assigned no value to the unit when evaluating the DSV offer. Hartford said in a note that other forwarders may benefit in the event UTi customers concerned about integration-related turmoil take their business elsewhere.
The global air and ocean freight business has been plagued for nearly 15 years by weak demand and overcapacity, with the oversupply being especially pronounced in ocean freight. The airport-to-airport airfreight business that UTi focuses on has been in secular decline for years, as cost-conscious businesses migrate to less-costly ocean freight services, and firms that need high-priority air express services use carriers like FedEx Corp., UPS Inc., and DHL Express, carriers that combine their transport and logistics functions and generally offer a faster and more convenient service.
In UTi's fiscal year 2016 second quarter, which ended July 31, net revenues from freight forwarding fell 21.8 percent from the prior-year period. Net revenues from contract logistics and distribution declined 7.4 percent year-over-year. The results were adversely affected by unfavorable currency fluctuations; the contract-logistics unit would have posted a small year-over-year gain had the currency impact been excluded.
UTi, considered a middle-of-the-pack international player, has hardly been immune from the weakening in international markets and the subpar sentiment it has triggered. A monthly index published by investment firm Stifel and consultancy Transport Intelligence that tracks the confidence firms have in the international transport and logistics business fell in September to its lowest level in more than two years. An index of the six-month outlook declined in September, resulting in a cumulative drop of 9.6 index points in the past four months, according to the survey.
UTi has also been dogged by internal issues, most notably a protracted and painful transition to a new enterprise-wide information system.
SUCCESSFUL INTEGRATIONS
In recent years, DSV has made a number of large and small acquisitions, including the Dutch transport and logistics company Frans Maas in 2006 and Belgian company ABX Logistics in 2008. In its statement announcing the UTi deal, DSV said acquisitions are "an integral part" of its strategy, and that it has a "strong track record" of successfully integrating acquired companies.
Integrating merged companies in the transport and logistics business has historically been a dicey proposition. Firms must combine a broad array of activities and ensure their cultures mesh, all the while maintaining consistent service levels so their customers don't defect to eager rivals. The integration process is especially daunting when it involves companies from different countries, where laws and regulations may clash.
In a note today, Transport Intelligence said that "UTi always struggled to pull together its disparate businesses and the new-look DSV will face the same problem." However, the firm agreed that DSV has been "remarkably successful" at executing integrations with prior acquisitions, which it attributes to the tight control DSV senior management has over its operations.
"Although (DSV) will have to work hard to refashion UTi's various businesses, if it gets it right it will lay the foundations for substantial growth on a global scale," said John Manners-Bell, the consultancy's CEO. "The purchase is a risk, but a modest and calculated one."
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."