Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
In the spring of 2014, FedEx Corp. and UPS Inc. announced plans to price deliveries of ground parcels measuring less than three cubic feet by their dimensions instead of their weight. At the same time, they said the respective changes would not be implemented until after the 2014 holiday season. That way, the carriers reasoned, businesses would have time to adjust to what was expected to be major changes to their shipping patterns. It would also avoid any unnecessary headaches during the hectic peak shipping period.
The start of the 2015 peak cycle is less than three months away, and shippers have been through nearly a year under the new pricing regimes. While no crystal balls were available for comment, it seems logical to postulate that, for shippers, the upcoming holiday experience will resemble that of the first 10 months: namely, those who've not felt much of an impact, for whatever reason, will skate through the holidays unscathed. Those whose budgets have been hit will continue to feel the pain, amplified by the increased holiday volumes and the year-round increase in shipping complexity brought about by the digital commerce and fulfillment tsunami.
When the changes were announced, several parcel consultants who work with shippers every day warned they would result in massive price increases for shippers tendering lightweight, bulky packages, which account for a large chunk of digital commerce. Dividing a three-cubic-foot package that measures 5,184 cubic inches by 166, the divisor set by the carriers in 2011 to calculate dimensional weight (or dim weight), would result in a rate equal to a 36-pound shipment, even though the parcel's actual weight would be much less. Shippers generally pay the greater of the actual or dimensional weight rate. Until this year, ground shipments measuring less than three cubic feet had been exempt from dimensional pricing.
Rob Martinez, president and CEO of consultancy Shipware, LLC, who forecast huge rate increases at the time the changes were made public, said prices have indeed risen significantly throughout the year and will cause economic turbulence for shippers through the holiday period as volumes accelerate. "Just because the impact of the increases has already been felt doesn't mean it will stop being felt," he said.
Based on Shipware data, the 2015 billed weight for parcels moving via FedEx Ground, the company's ground-delivery unit, was 28.7 percent higher than the parcels' actual weight. At FedEx Home Delivery, which delivers business-to-consumer (B2C) shipments to residences, the discrepancy was even wider; in 2015, the billed weight was 45.1 percent higher than the actual weight, according to Shipware data. In 2014, the gap was 11.6 percent.
At UPS, the 2015 billed weight for all its ground services was 16.4 percent higher than the actual weight, according to Shipware data; in 2014, the discrepancy was 12.8 percent. Martinez believes the UPS differential is not as extreme because the pricing change fell more heavily on B2C transactions and UPS handles more commercial packages than residential shipments.
Martinez said only a handful of the very largest shippers have been granted waivers or deferrals from the pricing changes. Virtually the entire shipping population lost the exemption, though some of the larger shippers were given a higher divisor to work with, thus effectively mitigating some of the increases, he said.
FedEx will likely decrease the benefits of the higher divisor over the life of the contract, which is typically three years, Martinez said. By contrast, UPS generally ties any divisor-related concessions to the length of the contract without any phase-outs, he added.
A DIFFERENT VIEW
Martinez's comments stand in sharp contrast with those of Paul Steiner, vice president of strategic analysis at consultancy Spend Management Experts. Steiner said the vast majority of large shippers his firm consults for have received either full waivers for the length of their contracts or, in the worst case, deferrals that run for most of the contractual period. He added that few customers have felt the need to ask how to reduce box sizes and empty packing space, steps that would help cut dimensional shipping costs.
Steiner said the 2011 reductions in the carriers' dim-weight divisors to 166 from 194, which applied to all shipments except ground parcels of under three cubic feet, had more of a profound change on the market than the most recent adjustments.
That said, Steiner, who spent 17 years at UPS in various executive roles including global pricing, said both carriers will find ways to offset foregone revenue associated with waivers and that their compensation will likely come from the budgets of small to mid-sized shippers that lack the volume and negotiating leverage of bigger companies.
Paula Heikell, chief marketing officer for consultancy Advanced Distribution Solutions Inc. (ADSI), concurred with Steiner's assessment of a bifurcated market with large and small shippers experiencing different outcomes. Heikell said all shippers stand to benefit from the development of mobile handheld dimensioning devices that provide upstream visibility of package dimensions so orders then don't have to be pulled and repacked to comply with the carriers' guidelines. The equipment, which is not cheap but stands to gain critical mass as prices come down, will also be invaluable in helping companies manage dimensioning in the complex but increasingly important area of returns management.
Michael Lambert, vice president of strategic solutions for consultancy Green Mountain Technology (formerly Green Mountain Consulting), falls somewhere in between Martinez's views and those of Steiner and Heikell. Lambert said the company and its customer base, whose core is large retailers, have spent a lot of time over the past 16 months preparing for the changes. Through negotiations with the carriers, Lambert said, Green Mountain has helped shippers mitigate a portion of the increases. "There has been some impact, but it's not as bad as it could have been," he said.
Lambert said the most revealing part of the past year's process was discovering that many shippers had no data-collection tools to capture dimensions or to determine whether their package sizes met the carriers' revised criteria. Before the changes, shippers were "not really thinking about what they were giving" the carriers, he said, adding that the new regimen sparked a behavioral change on the part of shippers.
Lambert said Green Mountain has followed a three-step plan to deal with the changes: understanding its impact, collaborating with carriers in rate negotiations, and implementing data-collection practices. The first two have largely been completed; the third is a work in progress that will take some time, he added. All of this will come as retailers move from having two to four distribution centers for fulfillment, to managing hundreds if not thousands of nontraditional locales like retail stores that are now beginning to serve as DCs.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
FedEx and UPS originally made the moves in an effort to better align package pricing with the amount of space the parcels occupied on a truck. They also believed that customers could gain by streamlining their packaging to remove unneeded "empty air" surrounding the product. Spokeswomen for the carriers said they've made a concerted effort to work with customers to make their packaging more efficient, in some cases connecting shippers with packaging and technology companies to help them remove "filler" and shrink shipment dimensions.
There are also alternatives. Shippers can use regional parcel carriers and the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), both of which offer higher dim-weight divisors and thresholds. They could shift packages to services like FedEx "SmartPost," managed in conjunction with USPS and which does not use dimensional pricing. Apparel shippers in particular could migrate to polybags for lighter, smaller shipments. Martinez suggested that merchants offer online shippers free shipping only to retail stores rather than to the consumer's residence. That way, multiple orders can be consolidated into one commercial shipment, he said.
Container traffic is finally back to typical levels at the port of Montreal, two months after dockworkers returned to work following a strike, port officials said Thursday.
Today that arbitration continues as the two sides work to forge a new contract. And port leaders with the Maritime Employers Association (MEA) are reminding workers represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) that the CIRB decision “rules out any pressure tactics affecting operations until the next collective agreement expires.”
The Port of Montreal alone said it had to manage a backlog of about 13,350 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) on the ground, as well as 28,000 feet of freight cars headed for export.
Port leaders this week said they had now completed that task. “Two months after operations fully resumed at the Port of Montreal, as directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, the Montreal Port Authority (MPA) is pleased to announce that all port activities are now completely back to normal. Both the impact of the labour dispute and the subsequent resumption of activities required concerted efforts on the part of all port partners to get things back to normal as quickly as possible, even over the holiday season,” the port said in a release.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.