Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
In the spring of 2014, FedEx Corp. and UPS Inc. announced plans to price deliveries of ground parcels measuring less than three cubic feet by their dimensions instead of their weight. At the same time, they said the respective changes would not be implemented until after the 2014 holiday season. That way, the carriers reasoned, businesses would have time to adjust to what was expected to be major changes to their shipping patterns. It would also avoid any unnecessary headaches during the hectic peak shipping period.
The start of the 2015 peak cycle is less than three months away, and shippers have been through nearly a year under the new pricing regimes. While no crystal balls were available for comment, it seems logical to postulate that, for shippers, the upcoming holiday experience will resemble that of the first 10 months: namely, those who've not felt much of an impact, for whatever reason, will skate through the holidays unscathed. Those whose budgets have been hit will continue to feel the pain, amplified by the increased holiday volumes and the year-round increase in shipping complexity brought about by the digital commerce and fulfillment tsunami.
When the changes were announced, several parcel consultants who work with shippers every day warned they would result in massive price increases for shippers tendering lightweight, bulky packages, which account for a large chunk of digital commerce. Dividing a three-cubic-foot package that measures 5,184 cubic inches by 166, the divisor set by the carriers in 2011 to calculate dimensional weight (or dim weight), would result in a rate equal to a 36-pound shipment, even though the parcel's actual weight would be much less. Shippers generally pay the greater of the actual or dimensional weight rate. Until this year, ground shipments measuring less than three cubic feet had been exempt from dimensional pricing.
Rob Martinez, president and CEO of consultancy Shipware, LLC, who forecast huge rate increases at the time the changes were made public, said prices have indeed risen significantly throughout the year and will cause economic turbulence for shippers through the holiday period as volumes accelerate. "Just because the impact of the increases has already been felt doesn't mean it will stop being felt," he said.
Based on Shipware data, the 2015 billed weight for parcels moving via FedEx Ground, the company's ground-delivery unit, was 28.7 percent higher than the parcels' actual weight. At FedEx Home Delivery, which delivers business-to-consumer (B2C) shipments to residences, the discrepancy was even wider; in 2015, the billed weight was 45.1 percent higher than the actual weight, according to Shipware data. In 2014, the gap was 11.6 percent.
At UPS, the 2015 billed weight for all its ground services was 16.4 percent higher than the actual weight, according to Shipware data; in 2014, the discrepancy was 12.8 percent. Martinez believes the UPS differential is not as extreme because the pricing change fell more heavily on B2C transactions and UPS handles more commercial packages than residential shipments.
Martinez said only a handful of the very largest shippers have been granted waivers or deferrals from the pricing changes. Virtually the entire shipping population lost the exemption, though some of the larger shippers were given a higher divisor to work with, thus effectively mitigating some of the increases, he said.
FedEx will likely decrease the benefits of the higher divisor over the life of the contract, which is typically three years, Martinez said. By contrast, UPS generally ties any divisor-related concessions to the length of the contract without any phase-outs, he added.
A DIFFERENT VIEW
Martinez's comments stand in sharp contrast with those of Paul Steiner, vice president of strategic analysis at consultancy Spend Management Experts. Steiner said the vast majority of large shippers his firm consults for have received either full waivers for the length of their contracts or, in the worst case, deferrals that run for most of the contractual period. He added that few customers have felt the need to ask how to reduce box sizes and empty packing space, steps that would help cut dimensional shipping costs.
Steiner said the 2011 reductions in the carriers' dim-weight divisors to 166 from 194, which applied to all shipments except ground parcels of under three cubic feet, had more of a profound change on the market than the most recent adjustments.
That said, Steiner, who spent 17 years at UPS in various executive roles including global pricing, said both carriers will find ways to offset foregone revenue associated with waivers and that their compensation will likely come from the budgets of small to mid-sized shippers that lack the volume and negotiating leverage of bigger companies.
Paula Heikell, chief marketing officer for consultancy Advanced Distribution Solutions Inc. (ADSI), concurred with Steiner's assessment of a bifurcated market with large and small shippers experiencing different outcomes. Heikell said all shippers stand to benefit from the development of mobile handheld dimensioning devices that provide upstream visibility of package dimensions so orders then don't have to be pulled and repacked to comply with the carriers' guidelines. The equipment, which is not cheap but stands to gain critical mass as prices come down, will also be invaluable in helping companies manage dimensioning in the complex but increasingly important area of returns management.
Michael Lambert, vice president of strategic solutions for consultancy Green Mountain Technology (formerly Green Mountain Consulting), falls somewhere in between Martinez's views and those of Steiner and Heikell. Lambert said the company and its customer base, whose core is large retailers, have spent a lot of time over the past 16 months preparing for the changes. Through negotiations with the carriers, Lambert said, Green Mountain has helped shippers mitigate a portion of the increases. "There has been some impact, but it's not as bad as it could have been," he said.
Lambert said the most revealing part of the past year's process was discovering that many shippers had no data-collection tools to capture dimensions or to determine whether their package sizes met the carriers' revised criteria. Before the changes, shippers were "not really thinking about what they were giving" the carriers, he said, adding that the new regimen sparked a behavioral change on the part of shippers.
Lambert said Green Mountain has followed a three-step plan to deal with the changes: understanding its impact, collaborating with carriers in rate negotiations, and implementing data-collection practices. The first two have largely been completed; the third is a work in progress that will take some time, he added. All of this will come as retailers move from having two to four distribution centers for fulfillment, to managing hundreds if not thousands of nontraditional locales like retail stores that are now beginning to serve as DCs.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
FedEx and UPS originally made the moves in an effort to better align package pricing with the amount of space the parcels occupied on a truck. They also believed that customers could gain by streamlining their packaging to remove unneeded "empty air" surrounding the product. Spokeswomen for the carriers said they've made a concerted effort to work with customers to make their packaging more efficient, in some cases connecting shippers with packaging and technology companies to help them remove "filler" and shrink shipment dimensions.
There are also alternatives. Shippers can use regional parcel carriers and the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), both of which offer higher dim-weight divisors and thresholds. They could shift packages to services like FedEx "SmartPost," managed in conjunction with USPS and which does not use dimensional pricing. Apparel shippers in particular could migrate to polybags for lighter, smaller shipments. Martinez suggested that merchants offer online shippers free shipping only to retail stores rather than to the consumer's residence. That way, multiple orders can be consolidated into one commercial shipment, he said.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."