Consumers are embracing parcel lockers, where they can retrieve (and often return) parcel shipments at their convenience. Delivery firms are taking note.
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Can Nigel Thomas become New York City's parcel locker king? The odds are clearly stacked against him. Major players like UPS Inc., Amazon.com, and the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) would seem poised to claim parcel locker supremacy in the nation's biggest market. By contrast, Thomas's company, Brooklyn-based GoLocker, less than a year old, has lockers in just five locations in the New York borough.
But Thomas, 39, is thinking big. He has set his sights on densely populated areas like Manhattan's Lower East Side, an area packed with multi-unit apartment buildings that generally don't have doormen or concierges to accept packages. He believes that GoLocker's business model, which is based on setting up urban distribution centers where the big delivery firms can drop off packages and avoid making costly and time-consuming residential deliveries, will gain substantial traction. Thomas is also banking on his 14 years of experience as a system engineer at FedEx Corp. to work in his favor because he brings an understanding of logistics practices that he thinks his rivals don't have. GoLocker charges a flat fee ranging from $1.99 a package to $14.99 for unlimited monthly deliveries to lockers. There is no charge to drop off a package.
Thomas may never rule New York's parcel locker domain. But he could carve out a profitable niche. That's because the U.S. market is still uncharted territory. Since November, UPS has pilot tested self-service lockers at nine locations in Chicago; a decision on whether to expand or modify the program, continue as is, or pull the plug will likely be made by the end of October, according to Kalin Robinson, director of new product development for the Atlanta-based shipping and logistics giant. USPS has manual lockers—units that are opened with a key—inside many of its post offices. Since 2012, it has run a pilot program using automated lockers located around post offices in the Northern Virginia suburbs of Washington, D.C. The program, called "GoPost," was expanded in 2013 to Brooklyn and Manhattan. FedEx Corp. has 80 locker locations in Dallas and its home base of Memphis, Tenn., through its "FedEx Ship & Get" program. Amazon launched its locker program four years ago and today has lockers in six states. The Seattle-based e-tailer pays retailers a fee to place its lockers in their locations.
A MATTER OF CONVENIENCE
Parcel lockers operate on the fringes of logistics and will likely continue to do so. But in a world where digitally obsessed consumers want as many options and as much convenience as possible, no one expects the model to disappear. In a 2015 survey commissioned by UPS, one-third of U.S. online shoppers said they want packages sent to locations other than their home, compared with 26 percent in the 2014 survey. A rising preference for alternate delivery locations could become a factor in which retailer a customer selects and which delivery company handles the goods.
The normal locker pickup process works like this: Once a package is delivered to a locker, the customer receives a digital pickup code via e-mail or text message. The customer enters the unique pickup code, as well as personal identification, on a touchscreen at the kiosk. At that point, either the assigned door will open automatically for package collection, or the customer will be prompted to enter the compartment number once it appears on the touchscreen. Generally, customers have up to three days to retrieve the parcels once they receive initial notification.
Parcel lockers today are often used as a backstop delivery option in the event a customer cannot accept a package at the primary location, or if the main delivery point is not secure. Yet that isn't always the case. UPS's "My Choice" program, which allows end customers to direct their own deliveries, has an option for users to redirect their packages to a locker location as long as it's within a predetermined distance from the residence, according to Robinson. USPS has a similar program, according to Kelly Sigmon, vice president of retail and customer service operations. USPS and Amazon also accept returns at locker locations.
Present-day parcel-locker strategy is based more on customer convenience than provider cost. But that may change at some point. For example, UPS sees parcel lockers and "access points" like retail establishments that are open late as important tools to drive down costs by reducing the frequency of repeat attempts at delivery, according to Robinson. "Consumers should keep in mind that they, too, benefit from the parcel carrier's lower operating costs, since the delivery companies base pricing in part on costs," said Rob Martinez, president and CEO of Shipware LLC, a consultancy.
There are few boundaries to selecting parcel locker locations. They can be placed in bodegas, subway systems, condominiums, convenience stores, dry cleaners, or any establishment that provides access during off hours when most people pick up their packages. Or they can be gleaming standalone structures like the UPS prototype in Chicago. There is even talk of developing temperature-controlled lockers that can accommodate shipments of perishables.
THE PUSH INTO CANADA
Although the parcel locker model is relatively new to the United States, it's a familiar one in other parts of the world. For a number of years, parcel lockers have been part of the landscape in Europe, where densely populated and space-constrained urban centers make the lockers relatively popular.
The biggest splash in North America is occurring in Canada, where InPost Canada, a joint venture of UCAN Post Inc. and Polish firm Integer.pl group, a major European parcel locker company, is working on a pilot project with Canpar Courier, one of Canada's largest couriers, to use lockers for second-delivery attempts if the end customer is not present at the primary location. InPost Canada deployed its first locker last November and handled its first parcel in early August. It has received $127 million in financing from various parties; most of the financing went to easyPack, the operating name for the European parcel locker concern. InPost Canada started with 200 locker locations and plans to operate 1,000 nationwide by the end of 2016, the company said in late May.
Tony Jasinski, InPost Canada's CEO, says the company's business model is "agnostic," meaning it will make its equipment available to retailers, delivery firms, or just about anyone willing to pay for it. According to Jasinski, InPost Canada offers a ready-made network that enables users to avoid the hassles and expense of site selection, operation, and maintenance. Some companies will try to build locker networks on their own but may find they've underestimated the work involved just in finding suitable locations, not to mention the ongoing costs and resources to market and operate the equipment. At that point, they may decide to turn to a company like InPost Canada with a core competency in the segment, he said.
Jasinski said, and Robinson of UPS confirmed, that the companies are in advanced talks about a partnership in Canada.
InPost Canada has also developed a "virtual address" program for Canadian consumers that want to order from U.S. retailers that currently don't deliver in Canada. Under the program, Canadians can have merchandise delivered to a specially designated InPost Canada U.S. address. InPost Canada will then transfer the parcels to a locker in Canada for pickup. Consumers will pay a fee for the program, Jasinski said.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."