Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
In an action reminiscent of the steps it took on its way two years ago to deny UPS Inc.'s proposed US$4.8 billion offer for Dutch delivery firm TNT Express, the European Commission (EC), the European Union's antitrust arm, said today it has opened an in-depth investigation into FedEx Corp.'s proposed US$2.8 billion all-cash acquisition of TNT Express.
The EC said today it has proceeded to a "Phase II" analysis of the FedEx-TNT Express deal, a move that usually doesn't happen unless there are questions raised about whether the merger would stifle competition. Most mergers that come before the EC are routinely cleared during Phase I of the review process. Once the EC is notified of a transaction, it generally has 25 working days to clear the deal or move on to Phase II, which takes the form of an in-depth probe. The agency was notified on June 26; the transaction was first announced in early April.
The EC said it had concerns the merger would face "insufficient competitive constraints" from the two remaining parcel carriers serving Europe: DHL Express, which is owned by German mail and logistics giant Deutsche Post AG, and UPS Inc. The combination of a reduced number of carriers and the purported behavior of DHL and UPS would lead to a "concentrated market in several member states for international express delivery services" to a destination within or outside the European Economic Area (EEA), the EC said. It did not identify which states would be most affected by the merger. The EEA is composed of 31 countries, including all 28 EU members.
The EC also raised concerns about the competitive impact the combination would have on international deferred, or nonexpress, services outside the EEA.
In a statement, Memphis-based FedEx said it "will continue to work together with TNT Express to meet the European Commission's need for additional due diligence and [is] confident that the combination of both companies will increase competition and create benefits for customers." FedEx said it still hopes to complete the deal during the first half of next year.
Industry watchers believed that European regulators would clear the FedEx-TNT Express acquisition because FedEx, at 4 or 5 percent of the market, has the smallest share among the four majors, according to Shipware LLC, a consultancy. The deal would make FedEx the second-largest player in Europe, with a 17-percent share, behind DHL's 19-percent share leadership position, Shipware said. By contrast, a UPS-TNT deal would have given UPS about 30 percent of the Euro parcel market, a level regulators were uncomfortable with.
The FedEx-TNT Express transaction won praise from analysts for melding complimentary strengths. FedEx operates a sizeable European air fleet, and TNT Express would give FedEx access to an expansive ground network and strengthen Fedex's currently weak road-transport positions in the U.K. and France, said Rob Martinez, Shipware's president and CEO. TNT Express, in turn, would shutter its expensive air system and then route air shipments through the FedEx network. TNT Express would also be able to expand its global footprint outside of Europe, especially in the U.S., where it is invisible.
Jerry Hempstead, a former top U.S. sales executive at the old Airborne Express and DHL Express and today the head of a consultancy that bears his name, said he wouldn't be surprised if DHL was lobbying to torpedo the deal in much the same way it used its influence in Europe to scotch the UPS-TNT Express deal. DHL not only would want to maintain its top-dog position on the continent, but it harbors long-running resentment toward UPS and FedEx for trying to block its 2003 acquisition of Airborne.
"Never underestimate the tentacles of DHL to strangle this deal, and either make it painful for a long time or … actually kill it," Hempstead said. He added that DHL could be sufficiently well-connected in Brussels and other European capitals to persuade the EC to kill the deal.
The EC has until Dec. 8 to finish its probe and to determine if the competitive concerns are legitimate. It said the opening of the investigation does not predetermine its outcome.
Should the case follow along the lines of the UPS-TNT Express saga, it would set up a pitched battle between the European monolith and FedEx Founder and Chairman Frederick W. Smith, arguably the world's most influential transport executive, and a master political player. If that isn't worth the cost of a movie ticket, it is surely worth the US$8 price of the popcorn.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."