Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Reports surfacing last night that UPS Inc. is in talks to buy privately held freight broker Coyote Logistics LLC for at least $1.8 billion came as no surprise to some inside the brokerage and third-party logistics (3PL) communities. Private-equity firm Warburg Pincus LLC, Chicago-based Coyote's majority owner, has shopped the company for about a year, but with little success, as potential suitors have shied away from Coyote's lofty valuation—based on Warburg's reported asking price, which, according to industry sources, is at 18 times Coyote's roughly $100 million annual earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). Broker valuations have a wide range, but 18 times EBITDA is considered very high. Japanese firm Kintetsu World Express paid 15 times EBITDA when it acquired APL Logistics in February. Talks with Atlanta-based UPS have been underway for about three months.
As with any rumored deal, it could go nowhere. UPS is a cautious company, and it's possible that it will conclude that buying a truckload brokerage operation—which is Coyote's forte, but largely alien to UPS—is not a good fit at the price being proffered. Satish Jindel, head of transport consultancy SJ Consulting Group Inc., predicted that UPS will not pursue Coyote because of the cost of the proposed deal, the risks of buying into an unfamiliar industry, and post-acquisition concerns of losing Coyote's primary asset, namely its people, many of whom could decide they don't want to join a company whose conservative culture is antithetical to freewheeling Coyote's. UPS and Coyote declined comment.
What is certain is that a transaction of this size would be the largest in UPS' 108-year history, topping its $1.25-billion purchase of less-than-truckload (LTL) carrier Overnite Transportation Co. 10 years ago almost to the day. If the combined entity is folded into UPS Supply Chain Solutions, the company's supply chain arm, the division would become the world's eighth-largest 3PL based on gross revenue, which is revenue before the cost of purchased transportation, according to Armstrong & Associates, a consultancy. It would spell the end of Warburg Pincus' eight-year investment in Coyote, moot Warburg's purported plans to take Coyote public, and provide Jeff and Marianne Silver, the husband-and-wife team who founded Coyote in 2006 and built it into a brokerage powerhouse, with a roughly $200-million payday; they own about 13 percent of Coyote, according to industry sources.
For shippers, a UPS-Coyote deal would likely be a net negative. It would take a big player out of the market and reduce an already-narrow field of the top brokers in an otherwise fragmented market. Coyote is considered an aggressive competitor and generally offers shippers a reasonable price for its services. As part of a much larger company, there would be some question as to whether the fiery style that has been so instrumental in Coyote's success would remain sufficiently stoked.
For the brokerage industry, a UPS-Coyote deal would likely be a net positive for essentially the same reasons. In addition, other brokers could benefit from the customer churn that could ensue if Coyote's people chose not to stay with UPS. There is also a question as to whether the Silvers would remain with an owner like UPS, which has a very traditional way of doing things.
"Traditional" is a word not found in the Coyote lexicon. The company's culture is entrepreneurial and risk-taking. Jeff and Marianne Silver built a workforce around those traits, hiring younger people with an entrepreneurial mindset and encouraging them to work hard and play hard. It might resemble a frat house at times, but it's hard to argue with the results. Coyote grew its revenue at a compound average growth rate of 473 percent from 2007 to 2010, according to Armstrong data. It should exceed $2 billion in 2015 gross revenue, Armstrong projected. The 2007-to-2010 results include the 2008 acquisition of Integra Logistics Services LLC, a rail-intermodal management services firm, and the 2009 purchase of General Freight Services, a North American truck and intermodal services provider.
Evan Armstrong, Armstrong's president, said he would urge UPS not to disrupt Coyote's culture, which Armstrong called Coyote's "secret sauce." However, Jindel of SJ Consulting said it would be almost impossible for a company like UPS, with such deeply rooted internal controls and processes, to "just leave Coyote alone."
UPS' August 2005 acquisition of Overnite is an example of the latter philosophy. Soon after the deal closed, UPS executives descended on Overnite's Richmond, Va., headquarters to begin the transition. It overlaid "the UPS way" on Overnite's business, even though UPS had never run an LTL operation before. UPS struggled with integrating Overnite's Eastern operations with the trucker's Western unit, known as Motor Cargo. It has taken several years, but the operation, which was rebranded as UPS Freight, is finally on solid operational ground.
There are solid macro reasons to explain UPS' rumored interest in Coyote. The segment of 3PL known as "domestic transportation management"—traditional freight brokerage elevated by sophisticated IT systems, and Coyote's stock-in-trade—has grown by 11.5 percent on a compounded basis from 1995 to 2014, according to Armstrong data. The category is expected to experience strong growth in the years ahead as more shippers look to firms like Coyote to optimize transportation modes and routes. Coyote's transportation management system, known as "Bazooka," is considered one of the better broker-owned technologies in the market.
UPS may also want to gain access to a cluster of big accounts, expand its service offerings, and beef up its network scale. That's something other firms have done—for example, Memphis-based FedEx Corp., with its December 2014 acquisition of Pittsburgh-based Genco Supply Chain Solutions, and Greenwich, Conn.-based XPO Logistics, which in April acquired French logistics firm Norbert Dentressangle S.A. for $3.5 billion. So far this year, there have been seven deals valued at more than $100 million, and M&A activity is on track to surpass the record of nine set in 2007, according to Armstrong data. "We are on our way to having a banner year for large M&A deals," said Armstrong.
UPS could also be attracted to Coyote's unique model, which uses split sales and operations teams for domestic transportation management and brokerage. In the split model, Coyote's sales staff focuses on securing shipments, while the carrier-capacity staff focuses on securing carrier capacity to transport the shipments. In traditional operations, the person who secures a shipment from a customer is also responsible for finding a carrier to cover the load. Coyote believes that the split model allows it to arrange transportation for more shipments per employee versus the traditional brokerage operations.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."