Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Reports surfacing last night that UPS Inc. is in talks to buy privately held freight broker Coyote Logistics LLC for at least $1.8 billion came as no surprise to some inside the brokerage and third-party logistics (3PL) communities. Private-equity firm Warburg Pincus LLC, Chicago-based Coyote's majority owner, has shopped the company for about a year, but with little success, as potential suitors have shied away from Coyote's lofty valuation—based on Warburg's reported asking price, which, according to industry sources, is at 18 times Coyote's roughly $100 million annual earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). Broker valuations have a wide range, but 18 times EBITDA is considered very high. Japanese firm Kintetsu World Express paid 15 times EBITDA when it acquired APL Logistics in February. Talks with Atlanta-based UPS have been underway for about three months.
As with any rumored deal, it could go nowhere. UPS is a cautious company, and it's possible that it will conclude that buying a truckload brokerage operation—which is Coyote's forte, but largely alien to UPS—is not a good fit at the price being proffered. Satish Jindel, head of transport consultancy SJ Consulting Group Inc., predicted that UPS will not pursue Coyote because of the cost of the proposed deal, the risks of buying into an unfamiliar industry, and post-acquisition concerns of losing Coyote's primary asset, namely its people, many of whom could decide they don't want to join a company whose conservative culture is antithetical to freewheeling Coyote's. UPS and Coyote declined comment.
What is certain is that a transaction of this size would be the largest in UPS' 108-year history, topping its $1.25-billion purchase of less-than-truckload (LTL) carrier Overnite Transportation Co. 10 years ago almost to the day. If the combined entity is folded into UPS Supply Chain Solutions, the company's supply chain arm, the division would become the world's eighth-largest 3PL based on gross revenue, which is revenue before the cost of purchased transportation, according to Armstrong & Associates, a consultancy. It would spell the end of Warburg Pincus' eight-year investment in Coyote, moot Warburg's purported plans to take Coyote public, and provide Jeff and Marianne Silver, the husband-and-wife team who founded Coyote in 2006 and built it into a brokerage powerhouse, with a roughly $200-million payday; they own about 13 percent of Coyote, according to industry sources.
For shippers, a UPS-Coyote deal would likely be a net negative. It would take a big player out of the market and reduce an already-narrow field of the top brokers in an otherwise fragmented market. Coyote is considered an aggressive competitor and generally offers shippers a reasonable price for its services. As part of a much larger company, there would be some question as to whether the fiery style that has been so instrumental in Coyote's success would remain sufficiently stoked.
For the brokerage industry, a UPS-Coyote deal would likely be a net positive for essentially the same reasons. In addition, other brokers could benefit from the customer churn that could ensue if Coyote's people chose not to stay with UPS. There is also a question as to whether the Silvers would remain with an owner like UPS, which has a very traditional way of doing things.
"Traditional" is a word not found in the Coyote lexicon. The company's culture is entrepreneurial and risk-taking. Jeff and Marianne Silver built a workforce around those traits, hiring younger people with an entrepreneurial mindset and encouraging them to work hard and play hard. It might resemble a frat house at times, but it's hard to argue with the results. Coyote grew its revenue at a compound average growth rate of 473 percent from 2007 to 2010, according to Armstrong data. It should exceed $2 billion in 2015 gross revenue, Armstrong projected. The 2007-to-2010 results include the 2008 acquisition of Integra Logistics Services LLC, a rail-intermodal management services firm, and the 2009 purchase of General Freight Services, a North American truck and intermodal services provider.
Evan Armstrong, Armstrong's president, said he would urge UPS not to disrupt Coyote's culture, which Armstrong called Coyote's "secret sauce." However, Jindel of SJ Consulting said it would be almost impossible for a company like UPS, with such deeply rooted internal controls and processes, to "just leave Coyote alone."
UPS' August 2005 acquisition of Overnite is an example of the latter philosophy. Soon after the deal closed, UPS executives descended on Overnite's Richmond, Va., headquarters to begin the transition. It overlaid "the UPS way" on Overnite's business, even though UPS had never run an LTL operation before. UPS struggled with integrating Overnite's Eastern operations with the trucker's Western unit, known as Motor Cargo. It has taken several years, but the operation, which was rebranded as UPS Freight, is finally on solid operational ground.
There are solid macro reasons to explain UPS' rumored interest in Coyote. The segment of 3PL known as "domestic transportation management"—traditional freight brokerage elevated by sophisticated IT systems, and Coyote's stock-in-trade—has grown by 11.5 percent on a compounded basis from 1995 to 2014, according to Armstrong data. The category is expected to experience strong growth in the years ahead as more shippers look to firms like Coyote to optimize transportation modes and routes. Coyote's transportation management system, known as "Bazooka," is considered one of the better broker-owned technologies in the market.
UPS may also want to gain access to a cluster of big accounts, expand its service offerings, and beef up its network scale. That's something other firms have done—for example, Memphis-based FedEx Corp., with its December 2014 acquisition of Pittsburgh-based Genco Supply Chain Solutions, and Greenwich, Conn.-based XPO Logistics, which in April acquired French logistics firm Norbert Dentressangle S.A. for $3.5 billion. So far this year, there have been seven deals valued at more than $100 million, and M&A activity is on track to surpass the record of nine set in 2007, according to Armstrong data. "We are on our way to having a banner year for large M&A deals," said Armstrong.
UPS could also be attracted to Coyote's unique model, which uses split sales and operations teams for domestic transportation management and brokerage. In the split model, Coyote's sales staff focuses on securing shipments, while the carrier-capacity staff focuses on securing carrier capacity to transport the shipments. In traditional operations, the person who secures a shipment from a customer is also responsible for finding a carrier to cover the load. Coyote believes that the split model allows it to arrange transportation for more shipments per employee versus the traditional brokerage operations.
Container traffic is finally back to typical levels at the port of Montreal, two months after dockworkers returned to work following a strike, port officials said Thursday.
Today that arbitration continues as the two sides work to forge a new contract. And port leaders with the Maritime Employers Association (MEA) are reminding workers represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) that the CIRB decision “rules out any pressure tactics affecting operations until the next collective agreement expires.”
The Port of Montreal alone said it had to manage a backlog of about 13,350 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) on the ground, as well as 28,000 feet of freight cars headed for export.
Port leaders this week said they had now completed that task. “Two months after operations fully resumed at the Port of Montreal, as directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, the Montreal Port Authority (MPA) is pleased to announce that all port activities are now completely back to normal. Both the impact of the labour dispute and the subsequent resumption of activities required concerted efforts on the part of all port partners to get things back to normal as quickly as possible, even over the holiday season,” the port said in a release.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.