Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Unlike other segments of the logistics field, warehousing has avoided the dreaded fate of "disruption" from newfangled business models. Since people began erecting physical structures to store stuff, capacity has been leased under multiyear contracts with fixed rates, terms, and conditions negotiated up front. Long-term deals foster security, stability, and strong customer-provider relationships, the maxim has held.
While long-term deals aren't going away, there may be room for an alternative approach. And it has come from a Seattle-based startup called Flexe Inc. Founded in August 2013, Flexe has created a spot market for warehouse space in an effort to exploit inefficiencies in a static environment. Flexe's platform matches companies with excess space or periodic vacancies with those who need space quickly, usually for a short time period, but who don't want or need the obligations of a long-term lease.
Today, the Flexe marketplace consists of more than 85 warehouses in 20 cities in the U.S. and Canada. The company doesn't operate any warehouses, and there are no leases involved; each facility is operated by the business with the available space. Flexe markets and advertises the space, defines the scope of each party's responsibilities and liability through a uniform contract patterned after standards developed by the International Warehouse Logistics Association (IWLA), and deploys cloud-based software that manages delivery scheduling, inventory tracking, and billing, among other tasks. A prospective user can name its price for the specific services it wants to take advantage of. The provider's proposal, once submitted, is non-negotiable. The user pays Flexe, which then cuts a check to the provider minus its commission.
Flexe's customers include third-party logistics service providers (3PLs), manufacturers, retailers, and wholesalers, all of which could be on either end of the transaction depending on the circumstances. What they have in common is that they work with a flexible and scalable model that, until now, has been largely alien to warehousing. The typical duration of a transaction on Flexe's platform is four to six months.
FOR WINE TOOLS FIRM, ROOM TO BREATHE
One of those customers is True Fabrications, a 12-year-old Seattle-based manufacturer and wholesaler of wine gifts and accessories, which has been with Flexe for about two years. Dhruv Agarwal, True Fabrications' co-founder and managing director, said the company made Flexe its sole warehouse partner after running out of space in its own facility and growing tired of competing for a fixed amount of excess capacity made available by its former vendor, a 3PL. The problem was especially vexing during the holiday season when True Fabrications generates about 40 percent of its revenue and its demand for warehouse space spikes.
Agarwal also saw little value in committing to a fixed long-term lease when it was impossible to predict where his business would be by the end of the contract term. Add to that the millions of unoccupied square feet available in the Seattle market, and, to the company, the move was a no-brainer.
Agarwal said the Flexe model offers True Fabrications a wide range of warehousing options at a competitive price. It can view its nationwide inventory flow from a single software platform. Rather than building and operating a larger warehouse of its own, True Fabrications leverages other people's space and shifts around labor and inventory when it's needed. "The cost that [the platform] is showing to us is similar to what it would cost if I had my own warehouse, only I don't have to sign a lease," Agarwal said.
A NEED FOR FLEXIBILITY
Karl Siebrecht, Flexe's co-founder and CEO, is an IT guy and not a warehouseman. So he approached the issue from a different perspective. Siebrecht discovered that virtually all warehouse space came to market in "big fixed chunks" and as part of long-term leases. Even subleases rarely ran less than a year, Siebrecht found. At the same time, millions of square feet nationwide sat unused and burned up capital. Providers of space, he reasoned, would rather have some cash flow for their assets than none at all, and would be willing to structure deals of a short-term and flexible nature.
Meanwhile, users who find themselves short of capacity for any number of reasons, or perhaps want to capitalize on a quick-hit opportunity in a market, would want a bit of warehouse space for a short-term ride. Bringing surplus capacity to those who needed it fast seemed to be a natural fit, Siebrecht believed.
It is impossible to quantify how much warehouse space across the country is unoccupied on any given day. Flexe last spring conducted a survey (albeit from a small sample size) of businesses that operate as users and providers of space. About 20 percent said they "always or often" needed warehouse space on short notice, while 60 percent answered that they needed it "sometimes." In addition, 40 percent said they frequently have excess capacity available.
Not everyone is enamored of the concept, however. Jack Rosenberg, Chicago-based national director, logistics and transportation, for Colliers International, a real estate advisory firm that manages about 1.7 billion square feet of industrial property worldwide, said the Flexe model would be "disruptive to 0.001 percent of the market." He said most lessors could not justify the costs of insurance and deal documentation for arrangements of a short duration. In addition, short-term deals don't compensate the lessors for the risk of having a recalcitrant tenant that doesn't vacate on time, or the potential for a fire or a hazardous materials spill, he said.
"Very short-term requests are common for TV shoots, advertising stills, video shoots, and movies," Rosenberg said. "My clients don't want the bother." In response, Siebrecht said the contract's language addresses as many negative scenarios as can be imagined. He added that Flexe does not accept transactions involving hazardous materials storage.
Dale S. Rogers, professor of logistics and supply chain management at Arizona State University and an adviser to Flexe, said the model best functions as a supplement to a company's existing warehouse infrastructure and not as a stand-alone operation. "It won't replace the traditional warehouse network. But it gives you the flexibility to do certain things" such as penetrating a hot market on a moment's notice, he said. For his part, Siebrecht said Flexe's customers are best served "putting a flexible and elastic capability on top of an existing infrastructure."
Rogers added that negative comments from industrial developers are rooted more in their disdain for short-term arrangements than in Flexe's strategy and tactics. "No industrial property developer wants to work with short-term leases where they have to turn over property so rapidly," he said. "They want the predictability and security that come with long-term arrangements."
"LONG-OVERDUE" MOVE
Shanton J. Wilcox, vice president of supply chain management for Capgemini Consulting N.A., said Flexe is no different from companies in other industries who create "secondary markets" to inject liquidity into an otherwise illiquid asset. For example, in the auto leasing business, a secondary market exists for one party to assume a car lease from another, Wilcox said. The same principle applies in high-density urban areas like New York, Chicago, and San Francisco where apartment subleasing is commonplace, he said.
Wilcox added that the time and conditions are right to apply the same model to the warehousing sector. "I would say that it is long overdue in this area," he said.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."