When it landed a contract with the National Football League, New Era Cap knew it would need a major DC overhaul. What it didn't know was that it would have just six months to do it.
David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
It often takes a catalyst to spur a company to fix something that on its surface doesn't appear to be broken. The catalyst can take many forms, but it's frequently a major event like an acquisition or new contract. Such was the case a few years back for New Era Cap Inc., when it landed a major five-year licensing deal that promised to double its sales volume.
New Era is the number one provider of licensed headwear in the world, and it has a long history of supplying hats to professional athletes and sports fans alike. The company has held the contract to supply caps to Major League Baseball (MLB) since the 1970s, providing all of the headwear major leaguers wear on the field. It supplies the same style hats to concession stands and retail shops at the ballparks as well as to other merchants that sell team apparel, including sporting goods retailers (like Dick's, Footlocker, Lids, and The Sports Authority) and department stores.
New Era distributes all of these hats through its 300,000-square-foot distribution center (DC) in Harrisburg, Pa., which is operated by Menlo Logistics. The facility processes only hats; other sites handle T-shirts and other apparel. About 60 percent of the company's total goods pass through Harrisburg.
The hats themselves come in a dizzying variety. By way of illustration, consider what's involved in the MLB business alone. While baseball has only 30 teams, each team may have three or four different caps, such as home, away, and a couple of alternate caps. Plus, each of these caps comes in a range of sizes, according to Jeff Holker, Menlo's director of operations at the Harrisburg DC. "For fitted caps, there are 13 or 14 different sizes of caps, from a 6 3/4 all the way to what they call a 'bucket head,' which is 8 1/4," he says. And that doesn't include the caps the company produces for consumers—hats for spring training, new stadium openings, or to commemorate individual players or accomplishments, such as the retirement last year of Yankee player Derek Jeter.
On top of that, the company supplies knit hats for football season and winter wear as well as caps to pro hockey and basketball (though not exclusively) and to some college teams. As a result, the Harrisburg DC's stock-keeping unit (SKU) count currently stands at around 23,000.
FLIPPING THEIR LIDS
When New Era first began using the Harrisburg facility in 2009, operations were largely manual. But the following year, the company landed a major contract that would force it to make major changes.
The deal dropped into New Era's arms like a deep forward pass. In late 2010, the company signed a licensing deal to supply hats for the National Football League (NFL) starting in 2012. Under the agreement, New Era is now the official hat provider for NFL teams and all of their many merchandising channels. Picking up the NFL agreement would nearly double the volume that Harrisburg would have to handle. That meant New Era would need to find a way to double its throughput capacity without increasing the footprint of the building.
And that wasn't the only challenge the headwear supplier faced. Around the same time, New Era was seeing a major shift in customer ordering patterns. Rather than ordering in bulk and maintaining extensive inventories, customers were trimming their stocks to just what was required to meet their immediate needs and relying on suppliers to ship replenishments on a more frequent basis. As the trend took hold, New Era's customers shifted from ordering items in pallet- and case-load quantities to cartons containing multiple SKUs that have to be picked individually. Trouble was, the Harrisburg DC was not built with piece picking in mind.
Filling the additional orders under the old methods would require a big increase in labor and a lot of added expense. New Era realized that it needed to change its order fulfillment process if it wanted to remain efficient and competitive.
New Era's distribution center in Harrisburg, Pa.
TACKLING THE OPPORTUNITY
With the start of the football contract looming, New Era began drafting a new game plan for the Harrisburg facility. But it only had about six months to do it. You could say that the clock was already in the fourth quarter.
New Era and Menlo approached Fortna, a warehouse design and engineering firm, to evaluate the existing distribution process and then devise a comprehensive plan for renovating the DC and installing automated systems. Among other goals, they wanted a process that would improve overall service while reducing operating costs by at least 25 percent. And in the best baseball tradition, New Era also threw Fortna a curve—installation of the new systems would have to be completed in a three-month period while fulfillment operations continued as usual.
"Installing and upgrading this facility during operations was definitely a challenge," recalls Holker. "The key to that was really extensive planning and coordination with the customer, with Fortna, and with Menlo. Project management was critical. Reviews were about every other day in terms of making sure that everyone was aligned."
The solution that Fortna came up with called for the installation of the company's own warehouse control system, new pick modules, RF (radio-frequency) picking, efficient pack stations, a shipping sorter, a "dynamic pick" area for expedited order processing, and new value-added service areas. The project was carried out in phases, so that one section of the building was renovated while work in another section continued under the manual processes. The entire implementation was completed within the three-month timeframe.
"Five years ago, this was a 100-percent manual distribution center; now it's highly automated and sophisticated—run by software and hardware. It has totally changed how New Era does business," notes Joe Stein, director for logistics and distribution for North America at New Era.
SEASONS OF CHANGE
Operationally, there was a silver lining to landing the NFL contract, as it helped to balance out what had been a fairly seasonal business for New Era. Previously, most products were shipped in the spring and summer to coincide with baseball season. Now, the three-shift facility handles more predictable volumes year round.
The hats themselves are manufactured both overseas and domestically. Among the factories is a facility New Era operates in the hat capital of Derby, N.Y., which is famous for having introduced the derby-style hat to the world.
The hats arrive in Harrisburg in containers and trucks. After they pass through receiving, they head to reserve storage in pallet racks unless needed immediately for picking areas. The picking zones contain a combination of carton flow racks, deck racking on the bottom levels of pallet racks, and bin shelving. Products are assigned to specific locations based on their volume and velocity. For example, most of the faster-moving products are housed in the carton flow racks.
Following instructions relayed via RF devices, workers pick items into cartons arranged on wheeled carts. Once all the items are gathered, the worker wheels the cart to one of seven conveyor drop zones. He or she then removes each carton from the cart and places it on the takeaway conveyor.
Rush orders are handled in a special section of the facility known as the "dynamic pick" area. This section houses the fastest-moving SKUs—those used to fill orders for large retailers that require replenishment shipments at least once a week. Flow racks here have 1,200 densely packed locations. As in other areas, picking here is directed by RF. Packing is handled at adjacent stations, with most cartons shipping with fewer than six hats.
One of the more interesting features of the facility is the 30,000-square-foot "heat seal room." If you've ever wondered how championship hats are ready for sale so quickly after a team wins the World Series or Super Bowl, that's where special "fast-response" processes like heat sealing come into play. Rather than preproduce winning hats for both teams, which would result in tremendous waste, New Era waits until the outcome has been decided before swinging into action, affixing championship patch decals to caps using special heat-sealing machines. Workers in this light manufacturing area actually watch the sporting events on large monitors so they can begin work the second a champ is crowned. As for how quickly this takes place, workers in New Era's heat seal room can turn out 40,000 hats in a single shift.
Once orders are completed in all areas, the products are conveyed through a sawtooth merge in the conveyor line that feeds value-added workstations and pack stations located on an upper-level mezzanine. At the pack stations, hats are checked, printouts and labels are produced, and the packages are sealed. The completed cartons are then placed onto a takeaway conveyor that transports them to a pop-up shipping sorter. The sorter diverts the cartons to seven lanes for shipment worldwide.
HATS OFF TO THE NEW SYSTEM
Today, over 14 million hats flow through the Harrisburg facility annually, with nearly 70,000 picked and packed daily during peak season. The automated equipment has been instrumental in helping New Era handle that volume, with room to grow.
The new system has also helped the company adapt to the shift toward smaller, more frequent customer orders. A typical order now consists of about six lines, with about seven hats per line. Many of the orders for large retailers are also packed and labeled for individual stores so that they can be swiftly cross-docked upon arrival at the customer's DC without requiring further processing.
On top of that, the new system gives New Era the flexibility to set aside certain picking cells for special processing to meet the demands of individual customers.
Although throughput has increased, processing times have been greatly reduced. Orders are now processed in hours as opposed to days under the old system. All the while, the cap distributor has kept a lid on operating expenses: Though the facility is now handling double its previous volume, operating costs have dropped by 30 percent.
Even better, the entire project was delivered under the original budget. That brought New Era a very handsome return on investment (ROI) of 1.5 years, which was also six months ahead of schedule—making the project a grand slam all around.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."