Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
An executive of one of the leading truck spot-market load boards said loads with the characteristics of less-than-truckload (LTL) shipments are populating its boards at twice the rate of truckload shipments, and today account for between 10 and 15 percent of posts on its boards.
Mark Montague, manager, industry pricing, for Portland, Ore.-based DAT Solutions, said loads such as partial truckload shipments and so-called hot shots, expedited traffic that moves for one customer, "are growing a lot on the load boards." Montague also said information DAT collects from property brokers shows LTL shipments are growing at a much faster clip than truckload traffic, though LTL accounts for a fraction of the much larger truckload industry's activity.
The data supports the growing evidence that the "LTL sector is something that a lot of brokers are very much into," Montague said yesterday on a panel session at the Transportation Intermediaries Association's (TIA) annual conference in Orlando.
Montague's comments support the view of the warming relationship between freight brokers and third-party logistics providers and the tight-knit LTL industry, where the top 10 carriers compose about 90 percent of the roughly $33 billion in total LTL annual revenue. While LTL carriers and third parties have always worked together, there has been a certain reluctance for the two sides to go all-in. Unlike a truckload shipment, which moves in linear fashion from one point to another, an LTL shipment involves multiple stops, multiple human touches, and dealing with often-complex tariffs and commodity classifications. Brokers familiar with the LTL space said its complexity means that brokers would have to settle for a $40 to $70 profit per load unless they could introduce adequate automation to drive down costs.
LTL carriers, meanwhile, have shied away from doing business with many transactional brokers, labeling them "bottom feeders" interested far more in shopping around for the lowest rate than in building relationships. In the past four years, LTL carriers have done a better job of managing their capacity, and have proved willing to either decline or shed freight they deem unprofitable. That renewed discipline, combined with a pickup in industrial demand and more bleed-off business from the capacity-crunched truckload segment, has put the asset-based players in control and forced brokers to be more on their toes.
Experts on a panel at TIA said that LTL carriers, helped in part by better technology to properly price their shipments, understand their costs far better than they did a decade ago. As a result, many carriers have moved away from a reliance on the "blanket" or "Freight All Kinds" pricing that has gotten many of them in financial trouble over the decades. LTL carriers "are more attuned to the world" than they've been in the past," said Jett McCandless, a board member of Shift Freight LLC, a Santa Fe Springs, Calif.-based LTL carrier that works exclusively with intermediaries. Perhaps with greater confidence comes a greater comfort level: LTL carriers have mostly overcome their historical bias toward brokers, Montague said.
Few brokers specialize in the LTL business, and starting an LTL brokerage from scratch is a difficult undertaking, experts said. The market is also somewhat concentrated. About seven brokers and 3PLs of different sizes control about $3 billion in annual revenue, according to data from consultancy CarrierDirect LLC.
Those who are in the sector or follow it said the potential is terrific. Not only is the LTL industry is growing organically, but LTL has provided an outlet for loads that might have moved by truckload if it weren't for tightening capacity. The decreased truckload availability has been brought on by the worsening shortage of commercial drivers. Montague of DAT said small to mid-size shippers are an especially fertile market for the brokerage community, as they may lack the volumes needed to get competitive LTL rates on their own.
Some of the big truckload intermediaries have noticed. At the end of 2014, Eden Prairie, Minn.-based C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc., the 3PL and brokerage giant, bought Kansas City-based Freightquote.com with an eye toward capturing more share of the small to mid-size shipper market that would be inclined to use LTL. Last October, Chicago-based broker Coyote Logistics LLC, a fast-growing concern that was reported last month to be readying an IPO valued at about $2 billion, hired C. Thomas Barnes, the former head of Con-way Multimodal, to build an LTL business to augment Coyote's traditional truckload segment.
Andy Berke, vice president, strategic development of Riverview, Fla.-based BlueGrace Logistics, one of the LTL brokers, said there is a "ridiculous amount of freight out there" and not enough people or time to move it all efficiently. This puts brokers who understand the LTL space in a terrific position, Berke said. "The opportunities out there are surprisingly great," he said.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."