Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
It took three years and a $2 billion cheaper price tag than UPS' subsequently failed proposal to convince Smith to change
his mind. But today the 70-year-old legend of the transportation world pulled the trigger on something he had said he wouldn't do:
acquire TNT Express.
The $4.8 billion all-cash acquisition of the Dutch firm is the largest in FedEx's 44-year history as a public enterprise. It
also restores the Memphis, Tenn.-based company's European footprint to a size not seen since 1992, when it ended an ambitious
European expansion program and withdrew from all but the continent's major commerce centers. Over the subsequent two-plus decades,
FedEx gradually rebuilt its European network through internal growth and a series of smaller acquisitions in the U.K., Hungary,
France, and Poland, the latter two announced shortly after UPS announced its offer in early 2012 to buy TNT. But nothing up to now
compares with the impact of today's announcement.
In a joint statement, the companies said the transaction would meld TNT Express' strong European road platform and its air hub
in Liege, Belgium, with FedEx's global capabilities that feed largely off of its North American and Asia-Pacific networks. Tex Gunning, TNT Express' CEO, said the company
did not solicit a buyout offer and was prepared to execute a five-year operational turnaround, called "Outlook," which launched
last year.
Gunning said TNT Express' customers would benefit from working with one provider with broader geographic reach and a more
robust product portfolio. He added that TNT Express shareholders will reap benefits today that "otherwise would only have ben
available in the long run." The deal, which based on the current value of the U.S. dollar to the euro works out to be about
$8.70 a share, represents a 33-percent premium over TNT Express' April 2 closing price. The deal is expected to close in the
first half of 2016.
Smith's comments implied that, despite the gains that have been made through internal growth and so-called tuck-in acquisitions,
FedEx needed to go large to keep pace with the rapid changes in global business and shipping. "This transaction allows us to
quickly broaden our portfolio of international transportation solutions—especially the continuing growth of global
e-commerce—and positions FedEx for greater long-term profitable growth," he said.
It may also be a reflection of Smith not wanting to be on the outside looking in as Europe moves towards a fitful recovery on
the heels of quantitative easing measures recently implemented by the European Central Bank (ECB). FedEx brings up the rear in
market share among the four major parcel carriers in Europe. About 30 percent of its international revenue comes from Europe,
compared to 50 percent for UPS, according to investment firm Morgan Stanley & Co. Several analysts surmised back in 2012 that UPS
wanted TNT in part to keep FedEx locked in last place with no chance of nailing a "homerun"-type acquisition to send its Euro
market share soaring.
EUROPEAN APPROVAL
The FedEx-TNT Express deal was approved by the boards of both companies but still must pass muster with European regulators. The
European Commission (EC), the European Union's antitrust arm, scotched UPS' offer in January 2013. But FedEx stands a better
chance of having its deal approved because its intra-European market share is significantly lower than that of UPS', according to
Jerry Hempstead, a former top U.S. official at DHL Express and now an industry consultant.
Share estimates of the European parcel market have historically been all over the lot. One estimate from DHL Express, Europe's
largest delivery concern, showed that DHL has 41 percent of the cross-border delivery market, UPS has 25 percent of the market,
TNT has 12 percent, and FedEx has 10 percent. The breakdown does not include intra-country and intercontinental airfreight
services.
By contrast, data compiled by the U.S. consulting company Shipware LLC found that DHL has 19 percent of the market, followed by
UPS with 16 percent, TNT with about 12 percent, and FedEx with less than 5 percent. The one common thread among these and other
estimates is that the combined FedEx-TNT entity now becomes the second-largest European parcel company.
Hempstead said he doesn't think UPS, which was the only prospective buyer for TNT Express in 2012, will counter the FedEx
proposal because of the EC's prior ruling. EU antitrust officials rejected the UPS-TNT deal because of market dominance and
anticompetitiveness concerns, though UPS and TNT proposed several divestiture steps to try to assuage antitrust issues. UPS even
approached FedEx about buying some of TNT Express' assets, but the discussions were very preliminary and went nowhere.
Susan L. Rosenberg, a UPS spokeswoman, said the company will study the FedEx-TNT deal but declined further comment. Claus
Korfmacher, a DHL spokesman, also would not comment on DHL's plans. However, it issued a statement saying a FedEx-TNT Express
combination would provide "additional business opportunities" for DHL because large-scale integrations often cause disruptions
for the combined company's customers, supplies, and staff, a scenario under which DHL could benefit.
DHL said the combination will "undoubtedly result in significant competitive changes in the express and logistics industry in
Europe as well as in various other regions worldwide."
One of those regions could be Latin America. In 2012 FedEx acquired Rapidao Cometa Logistica e Transportes SA, a move that
enabled FedEx to expand into the Brazilian domestic express market. Three years earlier, TNT Express acquired Brazilian-based
Aracatuba, which has a nationwide network and connects Brazil with Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Chile, Bolivia, and Peru. That
year, TNT Express also acquired LIT, a Chilean domestic express provider. The new combined network will be integrated to make
FedEx a stronger presence throughout South America, according to Cathy Roberson, a U.S.-based analyst for Transport Intelligence,
a U.K. consultancy.
IMMEDIATE GAINS
Rob Martinez, Shipware's CEO, said the move immediately vaults FedEx into European prominence by adding TNT Express' sizable
continental ground network to FedEx's freighter fleet serving the region. FedEx will benefit most notably in France and the U.K.,
where it doesn't have a strong road-haulage presence, Martinez said. TNT Express, meanwhile, can leverage FedEx's system to expand
into North America, where its market share is virtually negligible.
The dollar's appreciating value versus the euro was a key reason FedEx was able to buy TNT Express for about $2 billion less
than the UPS offer. On March 19, 2012 when UPS revised its initial offer for TNT Express upward by $400 million to $6.8 billion,
the U.S. dollar was trading at .7142 to the euro. Today, the U.S. dollar is trading 28.9 percent higher at .9211. A strong dollar
elevates the purchasing power of U.S. companies looking to expand in markets like Europe via acquisition.
But currency fluctuations may have been just one factor. During the 10-month period that the UPS offer was on the table, TNT
Express was adrift. It was piling up losses in Europe, Brazil, and Asia; confronting declining customer service metrics; and
facing turmoil in its upper management ranks. In September 2012, its CEO abruptly resigned, adding to the theory that TNT Express
was in limbo, waiting either for a suitor to snap it up or to just fade into irrelevance against the likes of FedEx, UPS, and DHL
Express.
Left on its own after UPS abandoned its bid, TNT Express has continued to struggle financially over the past two years.
Revenues have declined year-over-year. It posted a 2014 operating loss after a significant drop in operating income in 2013 over
2012 results. Losses widened to 190 million euros in 2014 from 122 million euros in 2013 and 84 million euros in 2012. The
company's market capitalization had eroded, giving FedEx an entry at a much lower price point than UPS enjoyed.
During the first half of 2014, however, TNT Express revamped its management team with turnaround experts. It sold off expensive
aircraft assets in favor of leasing arrangements, modernized its road network, and continued work on improving its Liege hub,
which should be complete din 2016.
Hempstead, who had given TNT Express up for dead after UPS walked away, said he was impressed by the steps the company has
taken since then. "TNT Express is a very different company than it was in 2012," he said.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."