Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
In the pallet world, wood has always been king, traditionally claiming about a 95-percent share of the overall market. And for good reason; there's a lot about the material to love. "It is cheap, strong, and safe," says Laszlo Horvath, director for the Center for Packaging and Unit Load Design at Virginia Tech.
But wood does have its disadvantages. For starters, there's the risk of splinters and protruding nails. And because wood pallets can harbor insects, pathogens, and mold, there's the issue of sanitation. Drawbacks like these have driven interest in "alternative" pallets made from materials such as plastic, paper, and metal. "For pretty much every disadvantage that wood has, there is a pallet out there that helps users [avoid] that problem," says Horvath.
So what's the best type of pallet to use? As is often the case, there's no one-size-fits-all answer—the choice will vary with the application. What follows is a look at the strengths and weaknesses of each type of material and the applications to which it is best suited.
PLASTIC: CLEAN BUT COSTLY
Next to wood, plastic is the most common material used for making pallets. Studies show that plastic accounts for 11 percent of the market demand, with 37 percent of pallet users employing at least some plastic units, according to Horvath. And interest in plastic is on the rise: In a 2013 report, the market research firm The Freedonia Group projected that demand for plastic pallets would grow at a double-digit pace through 2017.
Plastic pallets offer many advantages: They're impervious to pests and mold, they're free of splinters and nails, and they're easy to clean. Plus, they're lightweight. While wood pallets range in weight from 30 to 70 pounds, Horvath says, a plastic pallet can weigh as little as 10.
For these and other reasons, plastic pallets appeal to users across a broad range of industries, according to Curt Most of Orbis Corp., which manufactures plastic pallets. For example, food and pharmaceutical companies value them for their hygienic qualities, while many retailers prefer them for aesthetic reasons, particularly if they use pallets for store-floor displays. Companies that deal in high-end electronic goods often choose plastic because the pallets don't have any nails or protruding edges that can damage a product or its packaging, according to Most.
Plastic also has its downsides. Primary among them is cost. Plastic is typically more expensive than wood, especially if a company needs customized pallets (something other than the standard 48- by 40-inch footprint) that require unique molding and tooling, says Doug Gaier, director of regional sales for the pallet company Millwood. That makes them less than ideal for one-way shipments or applications where the pallet might get lost. In recent years, plastic pallet companies have responded to this concern by adding tracking devices and developing systems to help users keep tabs on their pallets. But the cost and the risk of "leakage" remain a deterrent for many companies.
Furthermore, although plastic is durable, it is not very "stiff," meaning the components of a plastic pallet will bend more than their wood counterparts will, says Horvath. This bending is sometimes known as "creep." And it's a bigger problem than it might seem, according to Horvath. "A lot of people say, 'Why do you care about the bending of the components if the pallet doesn't break?'" he says. The issue, he explains, is that if the components bend too much, it can result in the uneven distribution of stress on the top of the pallet. That, in turn, can compromise the integrity of the product—for example, causing bottles to leak or unit loads to become unstable.
A newer type of plastic pallet made from thermoset resins, as opposed to thermoplastic resins, may offer an answer to this problem. According to Fit Pallets, a maker of thermoset composite pallets, thermoset resins undergo a chemical change when they're molded, which strengthens the material and makes it less likely to bend or creep.
On top of that, thermoset pallets pose less of a fire risk than conventional thermoplastic pallets. Traditional thermoplastic pallets burn hotter and faster than wood ones and as a result, require a higher-capacity sprinkler system or a fire retardant. Thermoset plastic pallets, however, meet the UL 2335 classification for flammability (meaning they perform as well as or better than wood, and therefore don't require the costlier sprinklers) without the addition of fire retardants.
PAPER: LIGHT BUT SHORT-LIVED
In recent years, another type of pallet—the corrugated paper pallet—has started making inroads in the market, according to Horvath. The Swedish furniture retailer Ikea, for example, made a big splash in 2011 when it announced it was switching from wood pallets to paper. The Freedonia Group estimates that corrugated pallets represent 11 percent of all market demand.
The main selling point of corrugated pallets is their low weight (roughly 8 to 12 pounds), which makes them easy to handle and reduces shipping costs. Ikea's pallets, for example, are 90 percent lighter than their wooden predecessors. This makes them a good choice for airfreight shipments and containerized loads, says Horvath.
The pallets are also 100 percent recyclable and, unlike wood, do not require any sort of heat treatment to prevent pest infestation. As a result, they're well suited to export use.
Corrugated pallets, however, have a short lifespan, which means users shouldn't look to get multiple trips from them. They also cannot handle heavy loads. Nor do they stand up to moisture.
METAL: HEAVY GOING
Metal pallets are typically made from steel, aluminum, or some combination of the two. The market for metal pallets is still relatively small. According to Horvath, the material only represents 0.8 percent of the market demand and is being utilized by 7 percent of users. The Freedonia Group, however, expects that demand for metal pallets will grow at a faster rate than demand for pallets of any other material into 2017.
Both steel and aluminum pallets are strong, durable, and extremely easy to clean. Steel pallets, however, tend to be extremely heavy, often weighing over 50 pounds, according to Gaier. As a result, their use is largely restricted to specialized heavy-duty applications, says Horvath. For instance, the military uses steel pallets for shipping machinery and munitions.
Aluminum is lighter than steel, weighing on average less than 40 pounds for a standard 40- by 48-inch pallet, and offers a high strength-to-weight ratio, according to Peter Johnson, president of Eco Pact, a manufacturer of aluminum pallets. "Aluminum is also clean and sterile, and doesn't rust," he says. "Additionally, bacteria won't grow on it."
These qualities make the pallets well suited for industries such as pharmaceuticals, food, and industrial machinery, Johnson says.
Aluminum pallets can either be welded together or riveted, according to Johnson. Welded pallets are generally stronger but cannot be easily repaired. Eco Pact, however, makes riveted pallets with an interlocking design that improves the strength, according to the manufacturer.
While aluminum still commands only a small share of the market, Johnson says it's made headway over the last two years because of the material's cleanliness, safety (lack of nails, splinters, and protruding boards), and long lifespan. He expects demand for aluminum pallets to grow by 10 to 15 percent over the next five years.
A BIGGER PIECE OF THE PIE?
It seems unlikely that plastic, paper, or metal could topple wood from its perch at the top of the pallet market—a seat it has held for more than 70 years. "Even when you combine all of these other alternative pallet materials, you're still only talking about less than 5 percent of the pallet market," says Millwood's Gaier. "Wood is still the most sustainable, best dollar-value material for a pallet."
Yet by any measure, the pallet market is huge and growing. The Freedonia Group expects North American sales to hit 1.3 billion units by 2017, with a total value of $16.9 billion. And a bigger market means more room for lots of different types of pallets. As makers of alternative pallets proliferate and innovate, it seems likely they'll be able to carve out a profitable niche for themselves. And companies that have not looked at their pallet choices recently may find it advantageous to re-examine their options.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."