Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Third party logistics (3PL) giant C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. took a giant leap into the less-than-truckload (LTL) segment
late yesterday when it announced the purchase of Freightquote.com, a broker that generates most of its business from smaller LTL
shippers, for $365 million in cash.
Under the transaction, Freightquote will maintain its headquarters in Kansas City, Mo., and Eden Prairie, Minn.-based
Robinson said it plans to significantly expand its operations there. Freightquote will keep its name and operate independent
of Robinson. Tim Barton, Freightquote's founder and executive chairman, will stay on as a consultant to Freightquote, Robinson
said in a statement.
Founded in 1998, privately held Freightquote has built its business around an e-commerce platform that allows small to
mid-size shippers to access multiple rate offerings, to receive automated load acceptance confirmations, and to process payments.
It has about 80,000 North American customers, most of whom use the company for transactional services rather than for building
longer-term strategic relationships. Its calendar year 2014 gross revenues are projected to reach $623 million, while its net
revenues—revenues after subtracting the cost of purchased transportation services—are expected to hit $124 million.
LTL accounts for about two-thirds of Freightquote's net revenue base, with truckload comprising virtually all of the balance.
Robinson and Freightquote are nonasset-based providers, meaning they control no transportation assets and rely on providers with
equipment to move their customers' shipments. Both companies share some of the same LTL carrier base.
John Wiehoff, Robinson's chairman and CEO, told analysts today that the transaction expands Robinson's reach into small
businesses, a market he called "enormous."
Robinson, by contrast, has a stable of large national accounts that it manages through strategic relationships.
Robinson would prefer to grow organically and will only look at prospective acquisitions that offer a unique value proposition,
Wiehoff said. Freightquote presented Robinson with one of those opportunities, he said.
The bidding for Freightquote came down to Robinson and Greenwich, Conn.-based XPO Logistics Inc. XPO is a fast-growing broker,
expedited transport provider, and freight forwarder that is emerging as Robinson's chief rival. Robinson acted in part as a
defensive measure to keep Freightquote out of the hands of XPO, which has been growing largely through acquisitions. Wiehoff said
on the analyst call that he was unaware of other bidders for Freightquote. Bradley S. Jacobs, XPO's chairman, president, and CEO,
declined comment.
The Freightquote acquisition will dramatically boost Robinson's LTL net revenue, which stood at $195.5 million through the end
of the third quarter. It will also add volume, scale, and density to Robinson's LTL pipeline, ostensibly enabling it to exercise
pricing leverage over LTL carriers.
In the third quarter, truckload services accounted for roughly 60 percent of Robinson's total transportation net revenues
through September. LTL, by contrast, represented about 14 percent of its total net revenue through the first nine months. Robinson
is the nation's largest freight broker, and its total nine-month gross revenue of $10.1 billion, most of which comes from
brokerage, dwarfs that of any rival.
Like other third-party logistics firms with brokerage operations, Robinson's roots lie in the truckload sector, which is 10 to
14 times larger than the $35 billion-a-year LTL category. However, brokers have begun to expand more deeply into the LTL segment,
where they've always had some degree of exposure. Today, third-party logistics firms control about one-fourth of the LTL market,
up from 2 percent in 1998, according to data from consultancy SJ Consulting.
The increasing encroachment of 3PLs and brokers into the market has meaningful implications for LTL shippers and carriers.
These intermediaries bring with them large freight volumes that they could leverage to extract lower carrier rates, thus
negatively impacting carrier margins, according to Satish Jindel, SJ's founder and president. Jindel said the firm is preparing a
study examining the trend. The study will be published sometime in mid-January, about the time the Robinson-Freightquote
transaction is expected to close. Jindel said in a phone interview that LTL carriers will need to be vigilant to protect their
profit margins from high-volume 3PLs seeking to use their clout to drive down prices.
In moving into LTL, brokers see an opportunity to penetrate a less-mature sector for their services. In addition, they want to
diversify away from truckload, as big asset-based truckload carriers like J.B. Hunt Transport Services Inc., Schneider National
Inc., and Werner Enterprises Inc. form their own broker units to compete with the traditional players.
There are differences in the two segments. The truckload market is very fragmented, while in LTL the top 10 carriers control
the bulk of the shipments. While a truckload shipment involves a relatively simple line-haul from points A to B, LTL transactions
typically involve complex pricing scenarios and carrier rules. They also typically involve multiple stops and cross-docking events,
which can result in longer transit times, delivery variability, and additional handling, which increases the chances of freight
damage.
Robinson's last big acquisition took place in September 2012 when it bought Phoenix International Inc., an international
freight forwarder and customs broker, for $635 million in cash and stock. The transaction expanded Robinson's presence in the
global trade and transport arena. Through the first nine months, international services generated about $242 million in net
transport revenue, about 15 percent of the company's overall transport net revenue for the period.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
DAT Freight & Analytics has acquired Trucker Tools, calling the deal a strategic move designed to combine Trucker Tools' approach to load tracking and carrier sourcing with DAT’s experience providing freight solutions.
Beaverton, Oregon-based DAT operates what it calls the largest truckload freight marketplace and truckload freight data analytics service in North America. Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but DAT is a business unit of the publicly traded, Fortune 1000-company Roper Technologies.
Following the deal, DAT said that brokers will continue to get load visibility and capacity tools for every load they manage, but now with greater resources for an enhanced suite of broker tools. And in turn, carriers will get the same lifestyle features as before—like weigh scales and fuel optimizers—but will also gain access to one of the largest networks of loads, making it easier for carriers to find the loads they want.
Trucker Tools CEO Kary Jablonski praised the deal, saying the firms are aligned in their goals to simplify and enhance the lives of brokers and carriers. “Through our strategic partnership with DAT, we are amplifying this mission on a greater scale, delivering enhanced solutions and transformative insights to our customers. This collaboration unlocks opportunities for speed, efficiency, and innovation for the freight industry. We are thrilled to align with DAT to advance their vision of eliminating uncertainty in the freight industry,” Jablonski said.
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.