Ace Hardware worked with its waste and recycling contractor to get one DC to the point where it ships nothing to a landfill. A second DC is close behind. And that's only a part of the hardware cooperative's sustainability efforts.
Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
Ace Hardware, the big nationwide hardware cooperative, introduced sustainable practices to its distribution centers long before the term took on its current cachet. "We've always been doing recycling," says Dirk DeYoung, the company's facilities engineering manager.
In recent years, Ace has sharpened its focus on sustainable practices, formally adopting a sustainability program about five years ago. The company has achieved marked success in several areas—reducing waste from its distribution centers, cutting its overall energy use in those buildings, shifting to cleaner fuels for its lift truck fleet, and reducing the carbon footprint of both its private fleet and its for-hire truckers.
Earlier this year, Ace announced that one of its major import DCs had achieved "zero landfill status," and another is at 95 percent zero landfill. That means that materials flowing through the facilities are reused or recycled, and that little or no trash is sent to landfills or incinerators. Tim Duvall, Ace's supply chain director, says he first learned about the concept at a Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) seminar. "I presented it as a goal [to senior management]," he says. "I felt like it was the right thing to do."
GETTING TO ZERO
The first Ace Hardware facility to earn zero landfill status was the company's 336,000-square-foot import redistribution center in Suffolk, Va. An analysis performed with Waste Management, Ace's waste and recycling contractor, determined that up to 90 percent of the facility's waste could be recycled. The process they implemented allows the facility to mix recyclables into a single stream, which is later sorted by Waste Management for sale and reuse. As a result of that effort, the facility was able to switch from a 30-cubic-yard waste container to two eight-yard containers. "We've now reduced that even further," Duvall reports.
The remaining solid waste is sent to a Wheelabrator waste-to-energy incinerator in Portsmouth, Va. That plant produces steam for the Norfolk Naval Shipyard as well as electricity that it sells to the local utility.
Ace operates another import redistribution center in Kent, Wash., that has reached the 95 percent reuse or recycle mark. That effort began subsequent to the effort in Suffolk. "Once we formulated the process, we rolled it out [in Kent]," Duvall says. It has proved a bit more difficult, he says—a surprise to Ace given the Seattle area's reputation for environmental awareness. But he says that the project "has been no less embraced by the people there."
The next step will be to roll out the zero landfill effort at Ace's 14 retail support centers (RSCs)—a step that Duvall predicts will be "a much more involved process." But even without the support centers' participation in that effort, the company's success at recycling has been notable, Duvall says. "In 2013 alone, across our entire retail support network, Ace recycled more than 38 million pounds or 19,000 tons of pallets, plastic, and corrugate," he says.
What the company's managers understand—as do other managers throughout industry who have adopted sustainable practices—is that it not only makes the business a good neighbor, but it also makes good business sense. "At the end of the day, costs are in play," says Duvall. "We are saving thousands of dollars a year in waste disposal costs."
SEEING THE LIGHT
Ace has also worked to reduce energy use in its DCs. For example, the company has swapped out its existing lighting for high-efficiency light-emitting diode (LED) lighting in two of its RSCs. Ace projects that in its Sacramento, Calif., operation, it will cut consumption by 1.2 million kilowatt hours and save $200,000 in electricity costs per year. The Sacramento facility has reduced its demands for power by more than a third in less than three years, the company says.
Ace has enjoyed even greater success at its RSC in Princeton, Ill., a 1.1 million-square-foot facility. That building switched from 400-watt metal halide lighting to LEDs, resulting in $300,000 in annual cost savings at current electrical rates.
Furthermore, the company says, the LED lights, which emit little heat, will mean lower temperatures in the DC during the summer, further reducing energy costs. Lighting accounts for about 60 percent of a typical DC's electrical costs, DeYoung says.
For all its efficiencies, LED lighting has one significant drawback: Its high installation costs make it unlikely that Ace, or other companies, will adopt it universally. DeYoung says the conversion only makes sense in places where electrical utilities or governments offer subsidies or incentives for the installation. Installation costs for a large DC can run $800,000 or more, but incentives can offset up to half of that, making the investment more attractive. With incentives, DeYoung expects about a 2.5-year return on investment (ROI) for the installations in Illinois and California. If the company had to foot the bill on its own, the return could take five years or more.
Ace is incorporating most of its sustainability practices at its new facilities. The company this year has opened RSCs in Wilmer, Texas, and West Jefferson, Ohio. Both have energy-efficient motion detection lighting. Their lift and reach trucks operate on GenDrive hydrogen fuel cell units from provider PlugPower. The facilities create the hydrogen, leaving only super-pure deionized water as a byproduct. The technology also saves energy by eliminating the need for a battery charging operation. Ace management is crunching the numbers to see if it can roll out the technology to other DCs.
TRANSPORTATION YIELDS SAVINGS
Transportation is another area where Ace has focused substantial attention on sustainable practices. The company participates in the Environmental Protection Agency's SmartWay program, which encourages shippers and carriers to operate in an environmentally responsible manner. Ace became certified as a SmartWay shipper in 2009. The company's private fleet, about 400 tractors and 1,200 trailers, earned SmartWay certification in 2013.
To reduce the fleet's carbon footprint, Ace made a number of adjustments to its operating practices, according to Scott McLean, director of transportation. For instance, its onboard systems track a driver's hours of service and monitor driver behavior like hard braking and excess speed. The trucks' governors limit vehicle speed to 65 miles per hour. Technology installed in tractors limits idling to five minutes. Side skirts on a large portion of the trailers improve operating efficiency. The company has installed auxiliary power units in its sleeper tractors so drivers can sleep comfortably without running the engines. At each RSC, tractor-trailer drivers get a weekly scorecard showing miles per gallon driven and fuel consumption.
The company has deployed route optimization software to manage delivery routes to retail stores, a step that McLean said has cut overall miles driven by 7 percent. The company re-optimizes its routes once a year, except in the Northern states, where it's done twice annually, he says. The company, like many shippers, is making an ongoing effort to consolidate less-than-truckload (LTL) shipments into more efficient truckload and intermodal consignments.
As for how it's all working out, Duvall reiterates his point that these efforts make sense from a pure business perspective. "It is good for the company and it is good for the environment," he says.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."