David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
Parcel shippers may be in for a shock when they open their first parcel shipping bills of 2015. By that time, FedEx Corp. and UPS Inc. will have implemented what is known as "dimensional weight pricing" for all of their ground packages, including those measuring less than three cubic feet that were previously exempt from dimensional weight, or dim weight, pricing.
For the first time, parcels falling under the three-cubic-foot dimensional threshold will be priced based on a combination of weight and carton dimensions, not their weight alone. For shippers of lightweight items with packaging heft to them, this could spell double-digit price increases because the parcels will be rated based on the amount of space they occupy in a van. No longer will the carriers haul Styrofoam popcorn and other cushioning materials that amount to little more than air for free.
The companies say the pricing changes will foster greater packaging efficiency for shippers, reduce fuel consumption through better truck utilization, and result in a smaller carbon footprint. They are also likely to generate for the carriers hundreds of millions of dollars in additional revenues without significant fleet investments. "The simple reason for the new pricing structure is it is much cheaper for [FedEx and UPS] than buying more trucks and airplanes. They want to get more product into the trucks and airplanes they already have," says Jack Walsh, director of sales and marketing for CASI, a company that provides dimensioning and weighing systems.
Before the Internet changed shopping (and shipping) habits, a large portion of parcel loads involved business-to-business shipments that were optimally packed by the manufacturer. Things are different in the age of e-commerce. Speed has now taken precedence, and for most DCs doing e-commerce fulfillment, it is faster for workers to grab a larger carton than necessary than risk having to repack an order because the carton originally selected was too small.
Jack Ampuja, president of the packaging and supply chain consulting firm Supply Chain Optimizers, says an order picker chooses the wrong sized carton about a quarter of the time. "We have all gotten that small item, such as a flash drive, packed in a breadbox-sized carton," he says.
Such packaging habits result in wasted space. "Forty percent of total shipping volume is unnecessary air," says Hanko Kiessner, CEO of Packsize, a company that provides on-demand packaging systems that enable users to build custom cartons. "If we can reduce shipping volume by 40 percent, we can actually increase fleet efficiency by 66 percent."
KNOW YOUR NUMBERS
So how can companies avoid high parcel shipping charges? The first step is to talk to the carriers. Many companies have negotiated rates, so it remains to be seen if, or by how much, the pricing changes will immediately affect them. Experts emphasize that the time for shippers to act is well before their contracts are up for renewal. "If your water bill goes up, you turn off the sprinklers," quips CASI's Walsh.
The second step is to know what is actually being shipped. "You can't make intelligent packaging decisions if you don't know the [dimensional] volume of your products," says Walsh. Few companies know their product characteristics, especially those companies that have a constant churn of stock-keeping units (SKUs). But knowing the actual weight and size of products can pay big dividends. It can make handling easier, optimize storage space, and save on shipping costs. If you know the size and weight of each item shipped, you can then optimize how the items are packed so you're not paying to transport air.
As for how you can get those dimensions, there are a number of ways. Sometimes, suppliers will provide you with that data. But more often than not, shippers have to gather the data themselves. They can measure and weigh products manually using a tape measure and a scale, but this can be very time consuming. Another option is to use automatic dimensioning and weighing systems. Not only are these systems much faster and more accurate, but they can help take the guesswork out of the carton selection process. The systems can transmit the weight and dimensional data they capture to a warehouse management system and shipping software. The software then guides packers in choosing the best packaging for the product, including the correct size carton and the amount of dunnage needed to protect its contents. Some systems will also tie into a computer screen to display the optimal way to arrange products within the carton—for instance, with heavier items on the bottom and lighter ones on top.
In addition to being used to collect data on individual SKUs handled at the facility, automated dimensioning systems can be installed at the end of the line to capture information about each package in a shipment. This information is then passed along to the carrier and can also be used for customer billing. "It is important for shippers to include the dimensions of the parcel when processing their ground shipments. If they don't, they are likely to receive significant 'back-charges' from their carrier, which cannot be passed back to the shipper's customer," notes Randy Neilson, director of sales and marketing for Quantronix, the manufacturer of CubiScan dimensioning systems. "The system will collect the parcel's ID/order license plate number as well as its length, width, height, and weight," he says. "All of this information is then electronically transferred and integrated with the user's shipping software system."
Such systems are certified as legal-for-trade dimensioning and weighing systems. Therefore, the information they gather may also be useful in settling any billing disputes that might arise with the carrier or customer.
CARTON CORRECTION
Another way to address shipping costs is to evaluate the packaging you're using to see if the cartons you employ are the best ones for your needs. Consultants like Ampuja can help shippers determine carton characteristics, the number of cartons that are ideal for their products, and the sizes those cartons should be. "Six box sizes are about optimum for manual operations," Ampuja says. Companies that use computers to select the proper box size really have no limit on the number of boxes they employ but typically use about 15 to 18 boxes, which will provide more freight savings, he says.
Ampuja notes that shippers are sometimes reluctant to increase the number of boxes they use because they feel it will complicate their operations. However, expanding their carton lineup can save money if the cartons are a better fit for their products, he says, especially if computers handle the carton selection. "The money is in the freight, not in the box," Ampuja says.
Making even minor changes in the boxes' dimensions can also greatly affect the dim weight. For example, simply trimming a half-inch off the length, a quarter-inch off the height, and so on can save significant money when multiplied by thousands of boxes.
Obviously, consideration should be made for the types of products shipped—how heavy and fragile are they? What is the ideal corrugated thickness and design to assure the products are protected? The cartons should not be too weak or too strong, but as Goldilocks would say, "Just right." Another matter to consider is the optimal amount of dunnage to use to ensure the product will survive the journey while at the same time making the most efficient use of space.
"ON-DEMAND" PACKAGING
Another option for companies looking to eliminate wasted space is to go the custom carton route. They can do this by installing an on-demand packaging system that allows them to make custom cartons on the spot. Using measurements obtained from dimensioning systems, an on-demand packaging system forms the correctly sized box for the product being shipped. In short, these systems can neutralize the effects of the new dim weight charges, as the package is already as compact as it can get. "Our solution can actually help customers see a reduction in their shipping charges even with dim weight pricing," says Packsize's Kiessner. He says customers using his company's on-demand packaging solution currently obtain at least a 20-percent overall savings even before dim weight pricing kicks in. The savings come from lower shipping charges as well as a reduction in the amount of corrugate and dunnage needed.
Using a carton of the correct size also reduces the potential for product damage. "There is no better protection for any product than the best fit, so that there is no shifting inside the box," explains Kiessner.
On-demand packaging can be especially useful for companies shipping irregularly shaped items. One such shipper is CarPartsDepot Inc., an online store that sells automotive body parts, such as bumpers, fenders, grills, radiators, hoods, and headlights. Not too many of these parts fit neatly into a standard box. For that reason, CarPartsDepot relies on a Packsize system to create the oddly shaped boxes it needs.
"We have around 6,000 SKUs. Every one has a different shape, so we need a perfectly shaped box for each item," says Tony Chiu, CarPartsDepot's general sales manager. He says the retailer captures each part's dimensions, which are then stored in a computer until it's time to create the box for the shipment. About 1,200 to 1,500 parcels ship daily from his facility. He adds that he is not worried about dim weight pricing as he is already optimized for parcel shipping. "We are saving 15 percent now and will save even more comparatively when the dimensional weight [pricing] starts."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."