Industry groups ask White House to intervene in West Coast port labor dispute
Slowdowns spread from Pacific Northwest to Southern California ports, exacerbating cargo backlog in Los Angeles and Long Beach; holiday merchandise not at risk, but impact on U.S. economy could be huge, groups warn.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, and material handling, and a lecturer at MIT's Center for Transportation & Logistics. She previously was Senior Editor at DC VELOCITY and Editor of DCV's sister publication, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
For the first time in 12 years, the White House has been asked to intervene in a labor-management dispute that threatens to cripple
every West Coast seaport from Seattle to San Diego.
A coalition of more than 100 industry
associations sent a letter yesterday to President Obama urging the federal government to step
into contract negotiations between the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU), which represents dockworkers at 29 U.S. West Coast
ports, and the Pacific Maritime Association, which represents employers such as ocean carriers and terminal operators. Even a five-day port shutdown
would cost the U.S. economy approximately $2 billion a day, the groups said in the letter. They urged the president to encourage both parties to
begin working with a federal mediator, and to exercise his authority to intervene under the Taft-Hartley Act should there be a strike or
lockout.
The last such labor action at West Coast ports, a 10-day lock-out in October 2002, cost the economy an estimated $1 billion a day. That crisis
was considered more serious for holiday deliveries because it occurred earlier in the cycle than the current situation.
ILWU members have been working without a contract since July 1 while negotiations continued. Through the summer and most of fall, it had been
business at usual at the ports. But last week trouble emerged at the ports of Seattle and Tacoma, when the union refused to dispatch skilled
labor such as yard crane operators, and slowed down the pace of other operations. Productivity, measured in container moves per hour, dropped by
about half at both ports; cargo backlogs ballooned, and Tacoma sent longshore gangs home yesterday morning, said Sue Coffey, a Port of Tacoma
representative attending the Nov. 6 Coalition of New England Companies for Trade (CONECT) Northeast Cargo Conference in Foxboro, Mass.
The ILWU yesterday took similar actions at Los Angeles and Long Beach, which together handle some 40 percent of the nation's containerized
imports. Philip Sanfield, a spokesman at the Port of Los Angeles, said port congestion has remained essentially the same at the San Pedro port
complex, the country's busiest. As of mid-day Friday, there were 12 vessels sitting at anchor at the Ports of Los Angeles and adjacent Long
Beach, according to Sanfield.
At yesterday's CONECT conference, speaker Michael DiBernardo, director of business development at the Port of Los Angeles, did say that in
addition to the union's failure to dispatch the necessary number of skilled workers, dockworkers there have been slowing their pace by "working
to rule." He cited examples such as driving below speed limits and conducting more thorough and time-consuming chassis inspections than the
contract specified—"since they don't have a contract, they say they don't have to follow those provisions," he said. DiBernardo told
attendees that the labor problems "are not going to be fixed today or next week." When pressed by an audience member for something more specific,
he responded, "We are hoping to see something by Thanksgiving."
There's no mystery about the timing of the ILWU's alleged slowdowns, according to some observers. CONECT's Washington counsel, Peter
Friedmann, who also leads the Agriculture Ocean Transportation Coalition, noted that the Los Angeles/Long Beach development occurred almost
immediately after the mid-term elections. The union is taking advantage of the opportunity to worsen the already huge backlog at those ports,
caused by a surge of import cargo and a shortage of drayage drivers and container chassis, that has been building for months, he said.
"The problems in the Pacific Northwest are due solely to ILWU's negotiating tactics. Southern California's problems are due to a combination
of ILWU's actions and too much cargo," he said.
Friedmann said in a subsequent phone call that it's hard to predict whether Obama, now a lame duck whose party took a drubbing in the mid-term elections, will use the Taft-Hartley Act to intervene in the dispute. "You have to be willing to take on people ... I don't know that he has an appetite to take on labor," he said. If the president does do anything, Friedmann suggested, it could be something informal,
such as bringing both sides together to talk.
THE BEST-LAID PLANS ...
There has been some concern about the potential impact of the labor slowdown on the holiday shopping season, a major driver of U.S. economic
activity. But National Retail Federation Vice President, Supply Chain and Customs Policy Jonathan Gold said in an e-mail to DC Velocity
that most holiday merchandise is already in retailers' hands. The slowdown is affecting normal replenishment deliveries and deliveries of early
spring merchandise, Gold said.
"The industry started deploying their contingency plans earlier this year, even before the negotiations began. ... This was especially true
when we saw the heavy congestion at the Canadian ports, which impacted rail service," Gold said. Retailers are looking at all options to ensure
they get their cargo and merchandise to the store shelves, Gold said, adding that "congestion issues aren't limited to LA/Long Beach, as a lot of
other ports are also facing issues."
That fact is making it harder for importers to carry out alternative plans in either the U.S. or Canada. At the CONECT conference, a logistics
manager for a mid-size importer with a warehouse near Seattle and another in Illinois said she tried bringing Chicago-bound containers through
the Port of Prince Rupert in British Columbia, but chassis shortages and intermodal service backlogs there had made that alternative untenable.
To mitigate risk, she split cargo between Pacific Northwest and Southern California ports. With Seattle, Tacoma, Los Angeles, and Long Beach
jammed, her company currently has 48 inbound containers either en route to or currently held up in those ports, she said.
Because her company's biggest customers, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Target Corp., assess hefty fines for late deliveries, the logistics
manager said she's considering airfreighting critical orders. Another audience member, who works for a major international freight forwarder,
said that demand for trans-Pacific air cargo services had suddenly jumped within the last few weeks and that much of that additional demand was
coming from importers that usually bring in merchandise via ocean. Inbound airfreight rates on suddenly busier routes are climbing, making the
airfreight alternative even more costly than usual, he said.
The Port of Oakland is one of the few West Coast ports that says it has no congestion issues and can accommodate diverted vessels. However,
that advantage may disappear if the ILWU decides to take action there, too.
Container traffic is finally back to typical levels at the port of Montreal, two months after dockworkers returned to work following a strike, port officials said Thursday.
Today that arbitration continues as the two sides work to forge a new contract. And port leaders with the Maritime Employers Association (MEA) are reminding workers represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) that the CIRB decision “rules out any pressure tactics affecting operations until the next collective agreement expires.”
The Port of Montreal alone said it had to manage a backlog of about 13,350 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) on the ground, as well as 28,000 feet of freight cars headed for export.
Port leaders this week said they had now completed that task. “Two months after operations fully resumed at the Port of Montreal, as directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, the Montreal Port Authority (MPA) is pleased to announce that all port activities are now completely back to normal. Both the impact of the labour dispute and the subsequent resumption of activities required concerted efforts on the part of all port partners to get things back to normal as quickly as possible, even over the holiday season,” the port said in a release.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.