You say you don't have a distribution facility in Texas? Texas boosters may think you're crazy, but they'll still welcome you with open arms should you have a change of heart.
Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
In his country and western song from the '90s, Lyle Lovett opens by teasing those listeners who are not from Texas: "You say you're not from Texas/ Man, as if I couldn't tell/ You think you wear your hat right/ and pull your boots on so well." Lovett goes on in the chorus to affirm three times, "That's right, you're not from Texas," but then ends by reassuring the listener: "Texas wants you anyway."
If industrial real estate experts and state business development officials are to be believed, that sentiment also holds true for companies seeking a location for their next distribution facility. The state welcomes new business with open arms, relatively low costs, and a favorable tax environment.
Or as Mabrie Johnson from the economic development organization North Texas Commission bluntly puts it: "The only reason why you wouldn't want to come to Texas is you're crazy."
CENTRAL LOCATION
So just what does Texas have going for it? Where industrial site selection is concerned, quite a lot, says Tom Sanderson, CEO of the Dallas-based third-party logistics service provider Transplace. When companies go to choose a DC location, they typically concentrate on such factors as geography, transportation infrastructure, labor supply and costs, and business environment, Sanderson says. "The great thing about Texas," he adds, "is you can check off almost every box."
The first "box" that Sanderson (and most location experts) check off is location. Texas's central location makes it relatively easy to reach consumer markets all across the country. On top of that, the state has a large and growing consumer market of its own. Six of the country's 20 most populous cities are in Texas: Houston, San Antonio, Dallas, Austin, Fort Worth, and El Paso. Four of those cities—Austin, Houston, San Antonio, and Dallas—also rank in the top 10 fastest-growing major cities in the United States, according to Forbes magazine.
Texas also has undeniable geographic advantages for companies engaged in international trade, particularly with Mexico. Mexico has been benefiting from the growth of "nearshoring," as more and more companies bring manufacturing back from Asia and closer to consumer markets in North America, reports Marcel Johnson, vice president of business development at industrial developer Port San Antonio. That, in turn, has benefited Texas. Many of the goods being manufactured in Mexico, particularly automotive components, are then brought into Texas for distribution to the rest of the United States or are being partially made in Mexico and partially in Texas, Johnson says.
For this reason, the border towns of Laredo and El Paso have increasingly become hotbeds of logistics and distribution center activity. Growth in trade with Mexico has also sparked a boomlet in the DC market in Dallas-Fort Worth, as the metropolis has proved to be an attractive consolidation point for Mexican-made goods heading north on I-20 or east/west on I-35.
It's important to note that Texas's international trade is not one-sided. According to the state's Office for Economic Development & Tourism, Texas is the country's top exporting state, with more than $297.7 billion in exports. Texas's top export partners are Mexico, Canada, Brazil, China, and the Netherlands; its principal exports include petroleum and coal, chemicals, computers, nonelectrical machinery, and transportation equipment.
ROBUST INFRASTRUCTURE
In addition to being centrally located, Texas also boasts one of the strongest transportation networks in the U.S. "From a pure logistics standpoint, you can 'get there from here,'" says Terry Darrow, managing director of industrial real estate firm Jones Lang LaSalle's Dallas office.
For example, Texas has over 3,000 miles of highways, more than any other state. "We also do a fairly good job of overbuilding our roadways," says Will Condrey, associate director for the Houston office of Cushman & Wakefield, an industrial real estate firm. "We do not have, like a lot of other markets, heavy-haul corridors, and as result of that, trucks are welcome on all major thoroughfares."
Texas is also home to the second-longest rail system in the country and is served by three Class I railroads: the Union Pacific, the Kansas City Southern, and the Fort Worth-based BNSF Railway. The rail system connects Texas to both coasts as well as to Mexico. Rail service is supported by a network of intermodal facilities across the state, including two—the Alliance Global Logistics Hub in the Dallas/Fort Worth area and Port San Antonio—that boast high-capacity industrial airports, Class I rail terminals, and direct access to interstate highways.
The state also has excellent short-line rail service, which can bring freight right to a company's doorstep, according to Darrow.
For oceangoing freight, the state is home to the 12th-busiest port in the world: the Port of Houston. Historically, the port has been associated with exports, particularly of petroleum and petroleum products. But lately, a growing population base has created strong demand for imports. As a result, says John Moseley, the port's senior director of trade development, imports and exports are fairly well balanced.
The state also provides excellent aircargo service. The Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) alone handles more than $50 billion worth of cargo annually, mostly high-value items like semiconductors, cell phones, and aircraft parts. According to Mabrie Johnson, you can reach anywhere in the continental United States in approximately four hours by air from DFW, which has been recognized as the best cargo airport in North America by Air Cargo World magazine. The state is also served by Alliance Airport, the first purely industrial airport in the world.
A BUSINESS-FRIENDLY CLIMATE
Texas also has a well-deserved reputation for being business-friendly and possesses a pro-business government structure. The state does not have a corporate or individual income tax, and many county, city, and local authorities offer generous tax abatement programs to encourage job creation. The state also offers healthy industrial development incentive programs, such as the Texas Enterprise Fund, which is the largest "deal-closing" fund of its kind in the nation, and The Texas Skills Development Fund, which provides financing for customized job training programs.
Texas also has a strong supply of labor, with a civilian work force of more than 13 million people, the second largest (and one of the youngest) in the country. Furthermore, Texas is a "right to work" state, meaning that workers cannot be required to join a labor union in order to be employed, and overall union participation is relatively low.
Beyond all that, the state can offer companies space to grow. Unlike California, New York, or New Jersey, there is still land available for greenfield distribution sites near major cities. As a result, land costs and occupancy costs are reasonable compared with prices in metropolitan areas of a similar size. "We still have relatively cheap dirt," says Condrey of Cushman & Wakefield.
THE PROMISED LAND?
Yet Texas is not without its flaws. Many of the state's boosters tout the job-training programs created by government agencies, local community colleges, and business. However, the picture is not so bright when it comes to the school system in the state, according to a report by the Texas Legislative Study Group, Texas on the Brink. The 2013 report found that Texas ranks 50th in the percentage of its citizens who have graduated from high school and 44th in high school graduation rates. Additionally, the study reports that Texas has the highest percentage of uninsured adults in the nation and generates the most hazardous waste and carbon dioxide emissions.
But considering the state's central location, robust infrastructure, low land costs, and access to available labor, industrial site selection experts can perhaps be forgiven for overlooking these weaknesses. Or as Lovett sings: "So pardon me my laughter/ 'Cause I sure do understand/ Even Moses got excited/ When he saw the promised land."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."