With a long history as a center for logistics and transportation, Illinois might be a good spot for your next Midwest DC. Here are three reasons to consider the state ... and one reason not to.
Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
Crisscrossed by 12 major interstates. Served by seven Class 1 railroads. Home to O'Hare International, one of the world's premier aircargo gateways. And a history of investing in transportation infrastructure that stretches back to the 1830s. The state of Illinois has a lot going for it as a hub of logistics and distribution activity.
As Dan Seals, assistant director of the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity, puts it: "Logistics is at the core of what we do."
With that kind of infrastructure and history, it's easy to see why Illinois would make a good location for a Midwest distribution center. But it's not ideal for every company, according to site selection consultants and industrial real estate firms. Here are four factors to consider when deciding whether or not to locate your next DC there: three in favor and one against.
ADVANTAGE 1: LOCATION
One of the most obvious reasons to locate a distribution center in Illinois is the city of Chicago, with its consumer base of 2.72 million people. As the third-largest metro area in the country, Chicago is a market that can't be ignored. "Companies just need to be here to serve this market, whether it is by a warehouse near the metro area or away from the city in more of a regional DC location," says Bill Frain, senior vice president with the industrial real estate firm CBRE. "Our population base compels people to be here."
It is possible to serve Chicago from outside the state. For example, some companies serve the city from regional logistics hubs such as Indianapolis or across the state line in southeast Wisconsin. "But ultimately, service requirements are changing, and as speed to market becomes more critical, more companies are going to make decisions based on proximity to market," says Frain.
Adam Roth, director of NAI Global Logistics, a real estate and supply chain solution firm that focuses on distribution and warehouse companies, says a "reurbanization" trend is under way in Chicagoland that will compel companies to bring their distribution facilities within the city limits.
Illinois also has the benefit of being located in the middle of the continent, with excellent connections by rail, truck, air, and barge to East and West Coast ports as well as the Gulf of Mexico and Canada. As a result, some companies use their area DCs to serve not just the state or region, but also national and even international markets. In 2012, Illinois' exports to Canada and Mexico exceeded $25 billion, according to John Greuling, president and CEO of the Will County Center for Economic Development, a nonprofit development organization for Will County, located 35 miles southwest of Chicago.
"We're a natural hub geographically," says Greuling. "Illinois really meets the needs of just about any company looking to import/export to serve a good part of the North American market."
ADVANTAGE 2: INVESTMENT IN INFRASTRUCTURE
Since the early 1800s (almost as soon as Illinois became a state), the Illinois legislature and business community have tried to take advantage of the state's prime location by building a superior transportation infrastructure. This commitment has continued into the 21st century, with more than $43 billion being poured into its infrastructure since 2010, according to Seals.
For example, the "Chicago Region Environmental and Transportation Efficiency Program" (CREATE), a partnership between rail companies and federal, state, and city government, is investing $3.8 billion in 70 projects to improve freight and passenger rail efficiency in the city. Another public-private partnership is looking to create the "Illiana Expressway," which would link Illinois and Indiana, and allow trucks to bypass Chicago.
Perhaps the century's most successful infrastructure investment so far has been the CenterPoint Intermodal Center (CIC) in Will County. Opened in 2001, CIC is the largest master-planned inland port in North America, situated on more than 6,500 acres just outside Chicago, according to Michael Murphy, CenterPoint's chief development officer. Located near the interchange of Interstates 55 and 80, the center has access to the BNSF Railway's Logistics Park in Elwood and the Union Pacific Railroad Co.'s intermodal terminal in Joliet. By allowing companies to avoid the rail congestion that occurs at older rail yards inside the city limits, the intermodal facility helps shippers reduce dray costs and cut their carbon footprint, says Murphy.
"I think the investment that CenterPoint Properties made in the intermodal facility in Joliet and Elwood is paying enormous dividends for the region," says Frain, noting that retail giants Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and Home Depot Inc. have located 5 million square feet of DC space there.
Growth in and around the intermodal center looks to continue apace as trucking costs rise, capacity tightens, and more companies turn to rail, according to Roth. "I'm seeing a migration more toward boxcar and spur service, and I'm seeing more of a gravitational pull toward intermodal centers," he says.
ADVANTAGE 3: SKILLED WORKERS
Another factor working in Illinois' favor is its strong labor pool, according to Chris Lydon of the industrial real estate firm Cushman & Wakefield. Overall, Illinois has a labor force of more than 6.5 million workers and ranks third in the nation for transportation and material moving occupations. Looking to the future, the state expects to add nearly 20,000 jobs across the transportation, distribution, and logistics industries by 2020, according to Murphy.
Not only is the labor base large, it is also highly skilled. According to Seals, Illinois' population is among the most educated in the country. And if the skills aren't there, the state has several workforce development programs to help fill the gaps. "States across the country are grappling with the skills gap concern within the manufacturing and distribution sector, especially as older generations retire," says Murphy. "In response, a number of public- and private-sector organizations in Illinois have introduced various workforce development programs and grant initiatives to ensure the strength and volume of local skilled workers in the future."
The one drawback to the labor force in Illinois, at least in some companies' eyes, is the strong union presence in the state. "Unlike in Indiana and parts of Wisconsin where you can get away with nonunion labor, here in the Chicagoland area, you have to go union for the most part," says Lydon. "Obviously, those costs can have an impact and are sometimes a [liability] for us when competing against neighboring states."
STRIKE 1: TAXES AND INCENTIVES
If there is a disincentive that keeps companies from situating a DC in Illinois, it's the state's taxes and onerous regulatory environment. "Some businesses have called out Illinois' tax and regulatory policies for increasing the cost of doing business compared with nearby states," says Murphy.
For companies engaged in e-commerce, one big drawback to locating in Illinois is sales tax. Companies with a physical presence in Illinois must charge their customers in that state a sales tax on the goods and services they buy online, while those without a physical presence in Illinois are exempt from that requirement. "Companies without a physical brick-and-mortar presence in Illinois try to stay out of the state to avoid those taxes," says Eric Stavriotis, senior vice president with CBRE. For example, Amazon.com built two distribution centers to serve the Chicago market in nearby Kenosha, Wis.
Not surprisingly, neighboring states like Indiana, Wisconsin, and Missouri have capitalized on those liabilities, offering incentives and real estate tax rebates to lure business away from Illinois.
"Illinois has lost projects to places like Indianapolis, which have fairly aggressive incentive programs," says Stavriotis. "But on a gross basis, companies must determine whether it's better and more cost efficient to be outside of the state, rather than being close to their service area, where their transportation costs are going to be different."
Roth agrees, saying that while incentives can be an important factor in site selection decisions, they are often a secondary consideration. "They're typically not as much of a factor as transportation costs because transportation is forever," he says.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.