With a long history as a center for logistics and transportation, Illinois might be a good spot for your next Midwest DC. Here are three reasons to consider the state ... and one reason not to.
Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
Crisscrossed by 12 major interstates. Served by seven Class 1 railroads. Home to O'Hare International, one of the world's premier aircargo gateways. And a history of investing in transportation infrastructure that stretches back to the 1830s. The state of Illinois has a lot going for it as a hub of logistics and distribution activity.
As Dan Seals, assistant director of the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity, puts it: "Logistics is at the core of what we do."
With that kind of infrastructure and history, it's easy to see why Illinois would make a good location for a Midwest distribution center. But it's not ideal for every company, according to site selection consultants and industrial real estate firms. Here are four factors to consider when deciding whether or not to locate your next DC there: three in favor and one against.
ADVANTAGE 1: LOCATION
One of the most obvious reasons to locate a distribution center in Illinois is the city of Chicago, with its consumer base of 2.72 million people. As the third-largest metro area in the country, Chicago is a market that can't be ignored. "Companies just need to be here to serve this market, whether it is by a warehouse near the metro area or away from the city in more of a regional DC location," says Bill Frain, senior vice president with the industrial real estate firm CBRE. "Our population base compels people to be here."
It is possible to serve Chicago from outside the state. For example, some companies serve the city from regional logistics hubs such as Indianapolis or across the state line in southeast Wisconsin. "But ultimately, service requirements are changing, and as speed to market becomes more critical, more companies are going to make decisions based on proximity to market," says Frain.
Adam Roth, director of NAI Global Logistics, a real estate and supply chain solution firm that focuses on distribution and warehouse companies, says a "reurbanization" trend is under way in Chicagoland that will compel companies to bring their distribution facilities within the city limits.
Illinois also has the benefit of being located in the middle of the continent, with excellent connections by rail, truck, air, and barge to East and West Coast ports as well as the Gulf of Mexico and Canada. As a result, some companies use their area DCs to serve not just the state or region, but also national and even international markets. In 2012, Illinois' exports to Canada and Mexico exceeded $25 billion, according to John Greuling, president and CEO of the Will County Center for Economic Development, a nonprofit development organization for Will County, located 35 miles southwest of Chicago.
"We're a natural hub geographically," says Greuling. "Illinois really meets the needs of just about any company looking to import/export to serve a good part of the North American market."
ADVANTAGE 2: INVESTMENT IN INFRASTRUCTURE
Since the early 1800s (almost as soon as Illinois became a state), the Illinois legislature and business community have tried to take advantage of the state's prime location by building a superior transportation infrastructure. This commitment has continued into the 21st century, with more than $43 billion being poured into its infrastructure since 2010, according to Seals.
For example, the "Chicago Region Environmental and Transportation Efficiency Program" (CREATE), a partnership between rail companies and federal, state, and city government, is investing $3.8 billion in 70 projects to improve freight and passenger rail efficiency in the city. Another public-private partnership is looking to create the "Illiana Expressway," which would link Illinois and Indiana, and allow trucks to bypass Chicago.
Perhaps the century's most successful infrastructure investment so far has been the CenterPoint Intermodal Center (CIC) in Will County. Opened in 2001, CIC is the largest master-planned inland port in North America, situated on more than 6,500 acres just outside Chicago, according to Michael Murphy, CenterPoint's chief development officer. Located near the interchange of Interstates 55 and 80, the center has access to the BNSF Railway's Logistics Park in Elwood and the Union Pacific Railroad Co.'s intermodal terminal in Joliet. By allowing companies to avoid the rail congestion that occurs at older rail yards inside the city limits, the intermodal facility helps shippers reduce dray costs and cut their carbon footprint, says Murphy.
"I think the investment that CenterPoint Properties made in the intermodal facility in Joliet and Elwood is paying enormous dividends for the region," says Frain, noting that retail giants Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and Home Depot Inc. have located 5 million square feet of DC space there.
Growth in and around the intermodal center looks to continue apace as trucking costs rise, capacity tightens, and more companies turn to rail, according to Roth. "I'm seeing a migration more toward boxcar and spur service, and I'm seeing more of a gravitational pull toward intermodal centers," he says.
ADVANTAGE 3: SKILLED WORKERS
Another factor working in Illinois' favor is its strong labor pool, according to Chris Lydon of the industrial real estate firm Cushman & Wakefield. Overall, Illinois has a labor force of more than 6.5 million workers and ranks third in the nation for transportation and material moving occupations. Looking to the future, the state expects to add nearly 20,000 jobs across the transportation, distribution, and logistics industries by 2020, according to Murphy.
Not only is the labor base large, it is also highly skilled. According to Seals, Illinois' population is among the most educated in the country. And if the skills aren't there, the state has several workforce development programs to help fill the gaps. "States across the country are grappling with the skills gap concern within the manufacturing and distribution sector, especially as older generations retire," says Murphy. "In response, a number of public- and private-sector organizations in Illinois have introduced various workforce development programs and grant initiatives to ensure the strength and volume of local skilled workers in the future."
The one drawback to the labor force in Illinois, at least in some companies' eyes, is the strong union presence in the state. "Unlike in Indiana and parts of Wisconsin where you can get away with nonunion labor, here in the Chicagoland area, you have to go union for the most part," says Lydon. "Obviously, those costs can have an impact and are sometimes a [liability] for us when competing against neighboring states."
STRIKE 1: TAXES AND INCENTIVES
If there is a disincentive that keeps companies from situating a DC in Illinois, it's the state's taxes and onerous regulatory environment. "Some businesses have called out Illinois' tax and regulatory policies for increasing the cost of doing business compared with nearby states," says Murphy.
For companies engaged in e-commerce, one big drawback to locating in Illinois is sales tax. Companies with a physical presence in Illinois must charge their customers in that state a sales tax on the goods and services they buy online, while those without a physical presence in Illinois are exempt from that requirement. "Companies without a physical brick-and-mortar presence in Illinois try to stay out of the state to avoid those taxes," says Eric Stavriotis, senior vice president with CBRE. For example, Amazon.com built two distribution centers to serve the Chicago market in nearby Kenosha, Wis.
Not surprisingly, neighboring states like Indiana, Wisconsin, and Missouri have capitalized on those liabilities, offering incentives and real estate tax rebates to lure business away from Illinois.
"Illinois has lost projects to places like Indianapolis, which have fairly aggressive incentive programs," says Stavriotis. "But on a gross basis, companies must determine whether it's better and more cost efficient to be outside of the state, rather than being close to their service area, where their transportation costs are going to be different."
Roth agrees, saying that while incentives can be an important factor in site selection decisions, they are often a secondary consideration. "They're typically not as much of a factor as transportation costs because transportation is forever," he says.
According to FedEx, the proposed breakup will create flexibility for the two companies to handle the separate demands of the global parcel and the LTL markets. That approach will enable FedEx and FedEx Freight to deploy more customized operational execution, along with more tailored investment and capital allocation strategies. At the same time, the two companies will continue to cooperate on commercial, operational, and technology initiatives.
Following the split, FedEx Freight will become the industry’s largest LTL carrier, with revenue of $9.4 billion in fiscal 2024. The company also boasts the broadest network and fastest transit times in its industry, the company said.
After spinning of that business, the remaining FedEx units will have a combined revenue of $78.3 billion based on fiscal year 2024 results for its range of time- and day-definite delivery and related supply chain technology services to more than 220 countries and territories through an integrated air-ground express network.
The move comes after FedEx has operated its freight unit for decades. After launching in 1971 as an overnight air courier service, FedEx grew quickly and in 1998 acquired Caliber System inc., creating a transportation “powerhouse” comprising the traditional FedEx distribution service and small-package ground carrier RPS, LTL carrier Viking Freight, Caliber Logistics, Caliber Technology, and Roberts Express. And in 2006, FedEx acquires Watkins Motor Lines, enhancing FedEx Freight’s ability to serve customers in the long-haul LTL freight market.
FedEx share prices rose after the announcement, as investors cheered a resolution to the debate that had lingered since June about whether the event would happen, according to a statement from Bascome Majors, a market analyst with Susquehanna Financial Group. And FedEx Freight will become a major player in the sector, based on its 16% share of industry revenue in 2023, well above Old Dominion Freight Lines (ODFL)’s 10% and SAIA’s 5%, he said.
Likewise, TD Cowen issued a “buy” rating for FedEx based on the long-awaited move, according to Jason Seidl, senior analyst focused on rail, trucking and logistics. That came as investors were soothed about their worries of potential “dis-synergies” from the split by the detail that FedEx Freight and legacy FDX have signed agreements that will continue the connectivity of the two networks.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
Global trade will see a moderate rebound in 2025, likely growing by 3.6% in volume terms, helped by companies restocking and households renewing purchases of durable goods while reducing spending on services, according to a forecast from trade credit insurer Allianz Trade.
The end of the year for 2024 will also likely be supported by companies rushing to ship goods in anticipation of the higher tariffs likely to be imposed by the coming Trump administration, and other potential disruptions in the coming quarters, the report said.
However, that tailwind for global trade will likely shift to a headwind once the effects of a renewed but contained trade war are felt from the second half of 2025 and in full in 2026. As a result, Allianz Trade has throttled back its predictions, saying that global trade in volume will grow by 2.8% in 2025 (reduced by 0.2 percentage points vs. its previous forecast) and 2.3% in 2026 (reduced by 0.5 percentage points).
The same logic applies to Allianz Trade’s forecast for export prices in U.S. dollars, which the firm has now revised downward to predict growth reaching 2.3% in 2025 (reduced by 1.7 percentage points) and 4.1% in 2026 (reduced by 0.8 percentage points).
In the meantime, the rush to frontload imports into the U.S. is giving freight carriers an early Christmas present. According to Allianz Trade, data released last week showed Chinese exports rising by a robust 6.7% y/y in November. And imports of some consumer goods that have been threatened with a likely 25% tariff under the new Trump administration have outperformed even more, growing by nearly 20% y/y on average between July and September.