David Maloney has been a journalist for more than 35 years and is currently the group editorial director for DC Velocity and Supply Chain Quarterly magazines. In this role, he is responsible for the editorial content of both brands of Agile Business Media. Dave joined DC Velocity in April of 2004. Prior to that, he was a senior editor for Modern Materials Handling magazine. Dave also has extensive experience as a broadcast journalist. Before writing for supply chain publications, he was a journalist, television producer and director in Pittsburgh. Dave combines a background of reporting on logistics with his video production experience to bring new opportunities to DC Velocity readers, including web videos highlighting top distribution and logistics facilities, webcasts and other cross-media projects. He continues to live and work in the Pittsburgh area.
In the brave new world of retail distribution, companies must be flexible, accurate, and fast. That's especially true for those involved in omnichannel distribution, where retail, wholesale, catalog, and direct-to-consumer orders may be processed and shipped from the same facility. These retailers must adjust to new ways of doing business.
"If you look at the attributes of omnichannel, it increases complexity, decreases order size, and puts a burden on retailers to do distribution in a more cost-effective way," says Ron Kubera, senior vice president and general manager of voice company Vocollect, a division of Honeywell.
Keith Phillips, president and CEO at voice provider Voxware, reports that when retailers first move into multichannel fulfillment, they often discover that their distribution it is not as efficient as it should be. "The biggest challenge to omnichannel is that many retailers do not do their fulfillment that well," he says. "Where they are failing is not on the shopping experience, but on the fulfillment. What used to be seen as a necessary evil is now a critical part of the overall customer experience."
HEAR FOR THE TAKING
With its reputation for speed, flexibility, and accuracy, voice technology offers retailers a way to address the complexity of the omnichannel environment. "Their number one concern is how do they do e-commerce right and best utilize their assets. It is their biggest fear, and yet it is their biggest opportunity," says Greg Cronin, executive vice president at Intelligrated's Knighted division, a provider of voice systems.
Voice can help companies make the best use of their assets by providing a common platform for nearly every operation in the facility. While picking has always been voice's sweet spot, the technology can also be applied in receiving, putaway, replenishment, inventory management, shipping, and more.
"When you look at the entire process from end to end, there are a lot of manual activities," notes Voxware's Phillips. "Anytime you see a lot of manual tasks, voice can help."
And if a particular technology works for one channel, it is easy to see why companies would want to apply it to other channels as well.
"If I am doing fulfillment of one channel, why can't I take advantage of the economies of scale and use it for other channels too?" asks Bob Bova, CEO and president of voice provider Vangard Voice.
The flexibility of voice enables users to move easily from one DC task to another, while utilizing the same basic equipment. Few other technologies boast that capability.
THE RIGHT PRODUCT, OR ELSE
Among the challenges retailers face when moving to omnichannel distribution is the need to step up their game when it comes to order accuracy. If the wrong product is delivered to a company store, it's not such a big deal. The inventory is still within the company's system—records can be updated, the inventory reallocated, and the correct product delivered in the next shipment. But it's not that simple with direct-to-consumer orders.
"High 90s accuracy is not good enough with direct-to-consumer," notes Voxware's Phillips. "Sending the wrong item can be deadly. Those who don't figure it out are going to be facing severe consequences."
Rob McKnight, program manager for voice solutions at Intelligrated's Knighted, concurs. "Fast is nice, but it's not good to ship the wrong thing fast," he says.
As it happens, accuracy is one of voice's biggest strengths. To assure the right items are picked, voice systems include a confirmation procedure that uses check digits. The check digit, usually a series of three numbers, is attached to each pick location. The voice system first directs a worker to the assigned location. Upon arrival, the worker must read off the check digit to confirm that he or she is picking from the correct shelf or bin. As a result, voice is able to produce accuracy rates of 99 percent-plus.
Another advantage of voice is its ability to facilitate labor management. Forecasting and planning are not easy with omnichannel distribution. While store deliveries can be fairly predictable, Internet orders are not. They vary by day, season, and whim. Voice allows managers to shift labor to whatever area of the operation has the greatest need. Workers can use the same device, doing store replenishment one moment, handling putaway the next, and filling a direct-to-consumer order later. Most voice systems operate in real time with the flexibility to adjust assignments on the fly.
"When I have a piece of paper and I find a need to do something different, I need to go get another piece of paper. Voice offers real-time interleaving. It can redirect the work as needed," explains Jennifer Lachenman, vice president of product strategy at Lucas Systems, a voice technology provider.
Voice systems provide workers with step-by-step verbal instructions for performing their tasks, which makes training a snap. Workers simply have to be able to follow directions. As a result, training time is reduced to a few hours, compared with days for many other technologies.
"With voice, training is incredibly easy," says Ryan Absil, project manager for voice provider topVox. "You just go through the dialogue. Working with voice is like having a supervisor with you all the time helping you."
And while voice is designed to manage the process, employees still have the flexibility to adjust their work as needed. For instance, a worker assigned to putaway might encounter a situation where he or she is told to deposit a product in a location already occupied by another item. Voice allows that worker to change the assigned location simply by informing the voice system of the new storage location. Likewise, if a worker can't find a product he or she has been assigned to pick, that worker can simply ask the system to send him or her to a redundant location that holds the same stock-keeping unit (SKU).
"Voice strikes a nice balance of worker autonomy with the enforcement of best practices," says Lachenman of Lucas Systems.
Voice systems also offer visibility tools that can be used for monitoring worker performance. Managers can easily see where bottlenecks are occurring. They can also analyze individual worker performance to see where additional instruction and support are needed to help all members of a team reach their potential.
"The visibility tools are an important part in empowering the supervisors and other stakeholders who need immediate information," says John Schriefer, manager of marketing communications at Lucas Systems.
THE ENDLESS WAREHOUSE
One of the biggest changes brought about by omnichannel distribution is that order processing is no longer limited to the warehouse. Many retailers view their stores as extensions of their distribution centers. Customers can order online and pick up at the store. Stores can also be used to process returns. On top of that, online orders that might typically be filled in a DC can be assigned to a retail store to pick and pack. For example, some grocery chains are picking Internet orders directly from store shelves for local delivery or customer pickup. Voice vendors are now developing applications that will allow their technologies to be used at the store level.
In addition to order fulfillment, voice can be applied to store replenishment tasks and used for taking inventory. All of these are labor-intensive tasks that are performed by store personnel that are often paid better than warehouse workers. As a result, having efficient systems in the retail outlets is essential to the bottom line.
"Doing distribution from stores is offered as a service, but it is hard to make a profit at it," says Steve Hoffman, technology and fulfillment specialist at systems integrator Dematic. Hoffman explains that even though in-store distribution is a loss-leader, retailers believe they have to offer that option to customers. "The more you can do in the store with less labor, the better, even it is not profitable," he adds.
Using voice also makes store employees look less like warehouse workers. Instead of holding a scanner or pick list, workers using some voice systems appear as if they are merely wearing a phone earpiece. "When picking in the store, you don't want to upset the experience of the other customers," notes Hoffman. "Voice's ability to be hands-free and eyes-free means that workers won't be running into the customers."
Another advantage of voice is the software's ability to run on a variety of different hardware devices, including in some cases, smartphones and tablets. "We are building layers that make the fulfillment devices agnostic. It gives the customer the choice to use multiple devices operating on the same system," says McKnight of Intelligrated's Knighted.
"This is a new way that companies are applying voice," adds Vangard's Bova. He says that just about any task done in the warehouse or store can be directed by voice utilizing smart devices. "We can voice-enable the operations that the customer is already doing to increase productivity and improve the customer experience," he says.
That kind of flexibility may be voice's biggest selling point when it comes to the omnichannel environment. Whether in the distribution center or a store, it is a technology that can handle just about any process assigned to it.
"It all comes down to flexibility," notes Vocollect's Kubera. "When you look at the dynamics of omnichannel distribution, flexibility is really going to make the difference going forward."
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."