Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
An effort by four prominent companies to shrink transit times on U.S.-Mexico intermodal rail service
by streamlining customs clearance procedures at the border appears to be paying off, according to a top executive at
Kansas City Southern Railway (KCS), which launched the initiative some eight months ago.
The group—which includes KCS, consumer products giant Whirlpool Corp., trucker and third-party logistics
provider Schneider National Inc., and freight forwarder and customs broker Expeditors—has been working on a pilot
program to drive down delivery times on Whirlpool shipments moving from factories in Mexico to end points in the United States.
KCS initiated the program after receiving complaints from various customers about bottlenecks in Mexico that extended delivery
times beyond what was deemed acceptable for intermodal service. For example, a KCS analysis of Whirlpool's supply chain found that
it took 12 to 15 days to move shipments from the company's Mexican factories to its U.S. destinations.
In a bid to identify the problems, KCS created a pilot program with Benton Harbor, Mich.-based Whirlpool as the test customer.
KCS asked Whirlpool to participate because of its strong manufacturing and distribution presence in Mexico and its reputation for
collaborating with partners to improve supply chain performance in the corridor, according to Patrick Ottensmeyer, chief marketing
officer for Kansas City, Mo.-based KCS.
Once Whirlpool signed on, Schneider and Expeditors followed suit. Green Bay, Wis.-based Schneider is Whirlpool's trucker in the
market. Seattle-based Expeditors is its customs broker.
One of the program's key objectives was to cut Whirlpool's end-to-end delivery times to between 8 and 10 days, which could
potentially save the company millions of dollars in inventory carrying costs, according to Ottensmeyer.
ELIMINATING CHOKEPOINTS
KCS analyzed the operations of multiple terminals, customs brokers, and intermodal marketing companies (IMCs) that sell intermodal
services on behalf of the railroads. KCS also conducted a thorough review of its own processes. It discovered that it was
partially responsible for the tie-ups. A containerized Whirlpool shipment arriving at a KCS ramp would typically spend up to 90
hours at a terminal from the time it entered the gate until the time the train pulled out. KCS set about reducing that dwell time
to 24 hours, Ottensmeyer said.
Another chokepoint revolved around the nonuniform schedules of Mexican Customs. Some locations were open around-the-clock,
while others were not. Some kept evening and Saturday hours, while others did not. Customs closures would present problems for
KCS if a truck entered a terminal with cargo that was ready to be processed, according to Ottensmeyer.
In addition, the flow of containers and paperwork were often out of sync. Containers would enter KCS' terminal, where they would
be placed in a bonded yard awaiting processing and clearance. However, Mexican Customs is set up to receive documentation from
brokers in two daily batches. This meant containers could wait for hours before the documentation would reach Customs for
processing. To speed up the process, KCS, brokers, and Customs agreed to transmit and accept information in smaller batches and
with more frequency. KCS also digitized its manual data entry practices, a step that reduced the potential for human error,
Ottensmeyer said.
KCS has significantly cut dwell times since the steps were introduced, Ottensmeyer said. When the pilot began, KCS achieved a
24-hour turnaround on Whirlpool's containers about 37 percent of the time, Ottensmeyer said. Today, it is over 50 percent, he said.
Discussions are under way to automate the customs approval process itself; this includes the potential for digitizing a
long-standing tradition of requiring that customs officials stamp hard copies of export documentation before the goods can be
released. Ottensmeyer said KCS has "developed a productive dialogue" with Mexican customs officials about the possibility for
increased automation. "They are receptive to modernizing these processes to facilitate improved flow of goods across the border,"
he said.
The Holy Grail for speeding up transit times, according to Ottensmeyer, would be for customs brokers to provide truckers with
the "pedimento"—the Mexican export document that controls and verifies customs clearance—before the driver reaches the
ramp with the load. That would effectively provide release authorization at the time of arrival at the rail terminal. Currently,
the paperwork process doesn't begin until truck, driver, and container arrive at the ramp. KCS operates three dedicated ramps in
Mexico and uses other public ramps throughout the country.
If intermodal can remove the bottlenecks that slow transit times, it could capitalize on shippers' concerns about border
congestion and security on the roads and make meaningful inroads into the trucking industry's dominance of cross-border trade.
Through April, the last month public data was available, trucks carried 67.8 percent of the $44.4 billion worth of freight to and
from Mexico, followed by rail at 13.4 percent, according to the Department of Transportation's Bureau of Transportation Statistics.
Intermodal advocates argue that its users avoid truck traffic tie-ups at the border because shipments are often cleared in-bond
at interior locations. In addition, intermodal theft is virtually nonexistent because the doors of the lower container on a
double-stack train can't be opened while the container is in the well car, and the upper container is more than 15 feet off the
ground.
Ottensmeyer estimates that KCS has a less than 3-percent share of the 3 million trucks serving the U.S.-Mexican market each year
that either could be converted to intermodal service or would have the potential for conversion.
The Port of Oakland has been awarded $50 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) to modernize wharves and terminal infrastructure at its Outer Harbor facility, the port said today.
Those upgrades would enable the Outer Harbor to accommodate Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCVs), which are now a regular part of the shipping fleet calling on West Coast ports. Each of these ships has a handling capacity of up to 24,000 TEUs (20-foot containers) but are currently restricted at portions of Oakland’s Outer Harbor by aging wharves which were originally designed for smaller ships.
According to the port, those changes will let it handle newer, larger vessels, which are more efficient, cost effective, and environmentally cleaner to operate than older ships. Specific investments for the project will include: wharf strengthening, structural repairs, replacing container crane rails, adding support piles, strengthening support beams, and replacing electrical bus bar system to accommodate larger ship-to-shore cranes.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.