It was never love at first sight. But freight brokers and less-than-truckload carriers may find that arranged marriages could end up being profitable ones.
Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
Jett McCandless and Tommy Skinner believe they have gone where no transportation folk have gone before. McCandless is
founder and president of a Chicago-based consultancy called CarrierDirect. Skinner is vice president of Shift Freight, based
in Santa Fe Springs, Calif. CarrierDirect is the primary sales channel for Shift, which operates a range of less-than-truckload
(LTL) services from the West Coast into the Midwest and the Northeast through an outsourced network of carriers.
Shift isn't the lowest-cost provider. Yet in 10 months in business, it has established itself as a reliable player that sticks
to its hauling commitments even if it means carrying the load at a loss. What is different about CarrierDirect and Shift is they
are believed to have formed the first LTL model built to work only with brokers and third-party logistics providers (3PLs).
So far, Shift's early life has been mostly free of the usual growing pains. It has quadrupled its revenue year-on-year. It
recently announced a 30-percent expansion of its coverage area. And it seems to have found a receptive audience. McCandless, who
consults with LTL carriers to help them penetrate the broker universe and who sits on Shift's board, calls the company the "future
of LTL carriers."
Whether Shift fulfills that lofty expectation remains to be seen. What is evident, though, is that brokers and 3PLs—
especially those living in the "transactional" world that matches loads with trucks—are increasingly interested in doing business
with LTL carriers. And LTL carriers are returning the eye contact.
BUILDING ON A SOLID FOUNDATION
LTL carriers and intermediaries are no strangers to each other. Many shippers would rather work through their 3PLs than directly
with the carriers, said Bill Crowe, vice president, corporate sales for LTL carrier YRC Worldwide Inc. About 40 percent of all LTL
shipments are today billed through a 3PL, according to data from the American Trucking Associations (ATA) and the Georgia Center
of Innovation for Logistics.
Old Dominion Freight Line Inc., widely considered the country's top LTL carrier, gets about one-quarter of its annual revenue from 3PLs, J. Wes Frye, Old Dominion's CFO, said on a recent conference call with analysts. Virtually all of Old Dominion's business with intermediaries comes from "strategic 3PLs," big firms that offer warehousing and distribution and other services that extend beyond transactional activities, said C. Thomas Barnes, president of Con-way Multimodal, a brokerage operating under the banner of Menlo Worldwide Logistics, a large 3PL that does a lot of work with the carrier.
Today, about three-fourths of all LTL business with intermediaries is considered "strategic," with the rest seen as
"transactional," Barnes said. Yet the transactional side is growing faster than the strategic side, an ironic twist given the
carriers' general distaste for working with transactional brokers and 3PLs, Barnes said.
If projections for LTL growth are accurate, there might be more opportunities for 3PL-LTL collaborations. LTL revenue will grow
by 8.1 percent a year through 2018, and will double to $103 billion a year by 2024 from $51.5 billion in 2012, according to ATA
and the Georgia Center data. That would be faster than the projected growth rate for either truckload or private fleet operations.
(Several experts interviewed for this story say that the 2012 numbers are overstated and that total LTL revenue today is actually
closer to $35 billion a year.)
Crowe, who presented the data at an April conference of the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), said demand for
LTL services will continue to grow as improved supply chain technology allows shippers to build smaller-size shipments that move
in shorter-haul ground networks. This reduces inventory-carrying costs by shortening the time a shipper's cash is tied up in the
goods, he said.
Carriers, for their part, see brokers and 3PLs as a source of new shipper business. A growing number of small to mid-size
shippers now work with third parties, and carriers see intermediaries as the best way to tap that shipper market. According to
the consulting firm Armstrong & Associates, about 80 percent of the 100 smallest Fortune 500 companies used 3PLs to some
extent in 2012, up from 65 percent in 2008. About 81 percent of the companies comprising the Fortune 300 to 400 reported
using a 3PL in 2012, up from 71 percent in 2008. Those rates of growth were faster than for companies at the higher end of the
Fortune 500 scale, according to Armstrong.
DIFFERENCES AND DISTINCTIONS
Not all freight is alike, however, and experts caution that brokers and 3PLs accustomed to working with truckload carriers will
need a separate playbook if they take to the LTL field.
Brokering a truckload shipment is relatively simple: Freight moves in a linear fashion from point A to point B. A typical LTL
shipment, by contrast, involves multiple stops and numerous human touches, and carrier tariffs can be tricky to navigate. In
addition, LTL freight must be classified under specific, and sometimes obtuse, commodity codes that are based on various product
characteristics. In short, LTL is everything that truckload isn't.
Experts on a TIA panel said brokers can successfully handle LTL if they understand that LTL's complexity makes it nearly
impossible for brokers and 3PLs to manage each shipment without draining their margins. "LTL is a fantastic niche opportunity. It
is not a [good] niche opportunity if you have to touch every load," Andy Berke, vice president, strategic development for
Riverview, Fla.-based 3PL BlueGrace Logistics, told brokers. Following that path—that is, manually managing each individual LTL
shipment—would result in a broker only making about $30 to $50 a load, Berke said.
The good news, Berke said, is that brokers can "automate the heck out of LTL." Although tools like rate and routing engines can
be expensive to develop and implement, they can yield enormous benefits if done right, he said. "If you can crack the code where
the customer is tendering [the freight] and selecting your provider through you, you are making money in your sleep," Berke told
the group.
Brokers also must know the details of a shipper's products because, unlike truckload, LTL shipments are governed by a phalanx
of classification codes. Carriers reweigh every shipment they receive, and any misclassification identified during that process
means the broker or 3PL must go back to the shipper for more money. Matt Williams, president of Pro Star Logistics, a Salt Lake
City-based 3PL, said the goal is to make it easy for the carrier to execute a shipment and to avoid classification problems. "You
have to understand your shipper's commodity better than when you're shipping via truckload," he said.
YRC, for example, relies heavily on its 3PL partners to ensure the freight they receive is properly classified, Crowe said.
"Intermediaries know exactly what we know about the classification" of freight upon tender, he said. It is the third-party's
responsibility to educate the customer in how to properly classify a shipment, he added.
A CHANGED CLIMATE
Brokers and 3PLs looking to expand into LTL must also recognize that the marketplace has changed dramatically. Four years ago,
with the U.S. economy digging out from the Great Recession and with LTL carriers undercutting each other to grab market share,
space was relatively plentiful and was priced cheaply. The carriers then embarked on a multiyear program of network and equipment
rationalization. Today, truck capacity has tightened, predatory pricing is history, and rates have increased and could go higher
still. Carriers now have little tolerance for potential partners whose commitment doesn't extend beyond searching for the lowest
rate du jour.
"The true kind of price reseller is in trouble," Jack Holmes, president of UPS Freight, the LTL unit of Atlanta-based UPS Inc.,
told attendees of the National Strategic Shippers Transportation Council (NASSTRAC) annual conference in mid-April. Brokers and
3PLs that "don't have relationships [with LTL carriers] will suffer," especially as tightening capacity allows carriers to be more
selective about who they work with, Holmes said.
Even Skinner of Shift recognizes the inherent risks in getting deeply involved with the transactional broker crowd. "You can't
let them beat you up," he said in an interview at the NASSTRAC conference.
At this point, brokers and 3PLs need LTL carriers more than the other way around. The big truckload carriers are building
substantial brokerage operations, a strategy that impacts all brokers but especially those who earn their living through
transactional activity. Even the traditional parcel carriers have gotten into the act. UPS Freight is expanding its truckload and
intermodal brokerage operations as well as an asset-based, dedicated contract carriage service that uses a hybrid of owned and
outsourced equipment.
As big companies muscle in on brokerage in a bid to capture more of a shipper's total spend, many brokers, especially those who
do little more than provide domestic dry van services, may be in trouble if they can't expand their value proposition. Opening up
the LTL channel could be a way for intermediaries to do just that.
Logistics real estate developer Prologis today named a new chief executive, saying the company’s current president, Dan Letter, will succeed CEO and co-founder Hamid Moghadam when he steps down in about a year.
After retiring on January 1, 2026, Moghadam will continue as San Francisco-based Prologis’ executive chairman, providing strategic guidance. According to the company, Moghadam co-founded Prologis’ predecessor, AMB Property Corporation, in 1983. Under his leadership, the company grew from a startup to a global leader, with a successful IPO in 1997 and its merger with ProLogis in 2011.
Letter has been with Prologis since 2004, and before being president served as global head of capital deployment, where he had responsibility for the company’s Investment Committee, deployment pipeline management, and multi-market portfolio acquisitions and dispositions.
Irving F. “Bud” Lyons, lead independent director for Prologis’ Board of Directors, said: “We are deeply grateful for Hamid’s transformative leadership. Hamid’s 40-plus-year tenure—starting as an entrepreneurial co-founder and evolving into the CEO of a major public company—is a rare achievement in today’s corporate world. We are confident that Dan is the right leader to guide Prologis in its next chapter, and this transition underscores the strength and continuity of our leadership team.”
The New York-based industrial artificial intelligence (AI) provider Augury has raised $75 million for its process optimization tools for manufacturers, in a deal that values the company at more than $1 billion, the firm said today.
According to Augury, its goal is deliver a new generation of AI solutions that provide the accuracy and reliability manufacturers need to make AI a trusted partner in every phase of the manufacturing process.
The “series F” venture capital round was led by Lightrock, with participation from several of Augury’s existing investors; Insight Partners, Eclipse, and Qumra Capital as well as Schneider Electric Ventures and Qualcomm Ventures. In addition to securing the new funding, Augury also said it has added Elan Greenberg as Chief Operating Officer.
“Augury is at the forefront of digitalizing equipment maintenance with AI-driven solutions that enhance cost efficiency, sustainability performance, and energy savings,” Ashish (Ash) Puri, Partner at Lightrock, said in a release. “Their predictive maintenance technology, boasting 99.9% failure detection accuracy and a 5-20x ROI when deployed at scale, significantly reduces downtime and energy consumption for its blue-chip clients globally, offering a compelling value proposition.”
The money supports the firm’s approach of "Hybrid Autonomous Mobile Robotics (Hybrid AMRs)," which integrate the intelligence of "Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs)" with the precision and structure of "Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs)."
According to Anscer, it supports the acceleration to Industry 4.0 by ensuring that its autonomous solutions seamlessly integrate with customers’ existing infrastructures to help transform material handling and warehouse automation.
Leading the new U.S. office will be Mark Messina, who was named this week as Anscer’s Managing Director & CEO, Americas. He has been tasked with leading the firm’s expansion by bringing its automation solutions to industries such as manufacturing, logistics, retail, food & beverage, and third-party logistics (3PL).
Supply chains continue to deal with a growing volume of returns following the holiday peak season, and 2024 was no exception. Recent survey data from product information management technology company Akeneo showed that 65% of shoppers made holiday returns this year, with most reporting that their experience played a large role in their reason for doing so.
The survey—which included information from more than 1,000 U.S. consumers gathered in January—provides insight into the main reasons consumers return products, generational differences in return and online shopping behaviors, and the steadily growing influence that sustainability has on consumers.
Among the results, 62% of consumers said that having more accurate product information upfront would reduce their likelihood of making a return, and 59% said they had made a return specifically because the online product description was misleading or inaccurate.
And when it comes to making those returns, 65% of respondents said they would prefer to return in-store, if possible, followed by 22% who said they prefer to ship products back.
“This indicates that consumers are gravitating toward the most sustainable option by reducing additional shipping,” the survey authors said in a statement announcing the findings, adding that 68% of respondents said they are aware of the environmental impact of returns, and 39% said the environmental impact factors into their decision to make a return or exchange.
The authors also said that investing in the product experience and providing reliable product data can help brands reduce returns, increase loyalty, and provide the best customer experience possible alongside profitability.
When asked what products they return the most, 60% of respondents said clothing items. Sizing issues were the number one reason for those returns (58%) followed by conflicting or lack of customer reviews (35%). In addition, 34% cited misleading product images and 29% pointed to inaccurate product information online as reasons for returning items.
More than 60% of respondents said that having more reliable information would reduce the likelihood of making a return.
“Whether customers are shopping directly from a brand website or on the hundreds of e-commerce marketplaces available today [such as Amazon, Walmart, etc.] the product experience must remain consistent, complete and accurate to instill brand trust and loyalty,” the authors said.
When you get the chance to automate your distribution center, take it.
That's exactly what leaders at interior design house
Thibaut Design did when they relocated operations from two New Jersey distribution centers (DCs) into a single facility in Charlotte, North Carolina, in 2019. Moving to an "empty shell of a building," as Thibaut's Michael Fechter describes it, was the perfect time to switch from a manual picking system to an automated one—in this case, one that would be driven by voice-directed technology.
"We were 100% paper-based picking in New Jersey," Fechter, the company's vice president of distribution and technology, explained in a
case study published by Voxware last year. "We knew there was a need for automation, and when we moved to Charlotte, we wanted to implement that technology."
Fechter cites Voxware's promise of simple and easy integration, configuration, use, and training as some of the key reasons Thibaut's leaders chose the system. Since implementing the voice technology, the company has streamlined its fulfillment process and can onboard and cross-train warehouse employees in a fraction of the time it used to take back in New Jersey.
And the results speak for themselves.
"We've seen incredible gains [from a] productivity standpoint," Fechter reports. "A 50% increase from pre-implementation to today."
THE NEED FOR SPEED
Thibaut was founded in 1886 and is the oldest operating wallpaper company in the United States, according to Fechter. The company works with a global network of designers, shipping samples of wallpaper and fabrics around the world.
For the design house's warehouse associates, picking, packing, and shipping thousands of samples every day was a cumbersome, labor-intensive process—and one that was prone to inaccuracy. With its paper-based picking system, mispicks were common—Fechter cites a 2% to 5% mispick rate—which necessitated stationing an extra associate at each pack station to check that orders were accurate before they left the facility.
All that has changed since implementing Voxware's Voice Management Suite (VMS) at the Charlotte DC. The system automates the workflow and guides associates through the picking process via a headset, using voice commands. The hands-free, eyes-free solution allows workers to focus on locating and selecting the right item, with no paper-based lists to check or written instructions to follow.
Thibaut also uses the tech provider's analytics tool, VoxPilot, to monitor work progress, check orders, and keep track of incoming work—managers can see what orders are open, what's in process, and what's completed for the day, for example. And it uses VoxTempo, the system's natural language voice recognition (NLVR) solution, to streamline training. The intuitive app whittles training time down to minutes and gets associates up and working fast—and Thibaut hitting minimum productivity targets within hours, according to Fechter.
EXPECTED RESULTS REALIZED
Key benefits of the project include a reduction in mispicks—which have dropped to zero—and the elimination of those extra quality-control measures Thibaut needed in the New Jersey DCs.
"We've gotten to the point where we don't even measure mispicks today—because there are none," Fechter said in the case study. "Having an extra person at a pack station to [check] every order before we pack [it]—that's been eliminated. Not only is the pick right the first time, but [the order] also gets packed and shipped faster than ever before."
The system has increased inventory accuracy as well. According to Fechter, it's now "well over 99.9%."