Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
FedEx Corp. said late Friday it will change the way it prices its ground parcel services, a move that consultants warned will result in the most dramatic rate adjustments for parcel delivery in decades.
Under the plan, FedEx Ground, Memphis-based FedEx's ground parcel unit, will, effective Jan. 1, impose dimensional weight pricing on packages measuring 3 cubic feet or less, which is believed to comprise most FedEx Ground shipments. Dimensional weight pricing—known in the trade as "dim weight" pricing—sets the transportation price based on package "volume," or the amount of space a package takes up in a truck in relation to its actual weight.
In 2007, FedEx and its chief rival, Atlanta-based UPS Inc., began using a "volumetric divisor" to calculate dimensional
pricing on air and ground shipments of more than 3 cubic feet. First, a parcel's cube is calculated by multiplying its
length, width, and height. Then the cube is divided by the volumetric divisor to get the dimensional weight. In 2007, the
divisor was set at 194, but both companies reduced it to 166 in January 2011. By applying the lower divisor, the carriers
effectively imposed a significant rate increase on many customers. The changes yielded the carriers hundreds of millions
of dollars in incremental revenue.
Until Fedex's announcement last week, parcels measuring less than 3 cubic feet were exempt from dimensional pricing. How
UPS, which handles about 12 million daily ground packages, or roughly three times the number of daily ground parcels as FedEx
Ground, reacts to the new policies at its rival is an open question. Besides the similar changes made in 2011 to their volumetric
pricing strategies, the two have worked to impose restrictions on their customers' use of parcel consultants. UPS officials were
not available for comment.
Currently, FedEx Ground shipments that "cube out" below the 3-cubic foot threshold are priced based on their actual weight.
Thus, the rate for a 5-pound parcel that cubes out below 3 cubic feet is set at the delivery price for a 5-pound shipment.
Jerry Hempstead, who spent decades at top U.S. positions at the old Airborne Express and then DHL Express before establishing
an Orlando, Fla.-based parcel consultancy bearing his name, used an example of a 1-cubic-foot box that comes in at 1,728 cubic
inches. Dividing 1,728 into 166 would yield dimensional pricing at about 11 pounds. Shippers generally pay the greater of either
the actual or dimensional weight amounts.
Bumping up against the 3-cubic-foot threshold—which would mean stacking two similar-sized boxes on top of the first—
would yield 5,184 cubic inches, Hempstead said. Using the divisor of 166, this would result in dimensional weight pricing
equivalent to a 36-pound shipment, even though the actual weight of the parcel could be far less.
Calling this "the mother of all rate increases if it sticks," Hempstead said the move would result in hundreds of millions of
dollars in additional revenue for FedEx Ground and, by extension, its parent without any change in the unit's operations or its
value proposition.
"This is horrible news for shippers," he said in an email. "Hopefully they have language in their contracts to mitigate or
postpone this pain."
Rob Martinez, president and CEO of Shipware LLC, a San Diego-based parcel consultancy, called the effect of the change
"enormous." According to the Shipware database, which Martinez said comprises hundreds of shippers and millions of packages,
76.9 percent of business-to-business (B2B) shipments and 77.9 percent of business-to-consumer (B2C) shipments weigh less than 20 pounds, the range seen as most vulnerable to FedEx Ground's pricing change.
In addition, only seven of the top 25 box configurations sold in the U.S. exceed the 3-cubic-foot threshold, Martinez said.
That means 18 of the top 25 box sizes now would be exposed to the new policy.
Jess Bunn, a FedEx spokesman, said the move aligns FedEx Ground's dimensional weight pricing with its policies at the larger
FedEx Express unit, which manages its air express and international operations. Applying dimensional pricing to all packages will
"provide a more simplified, consistent experience to our customers," Bunn said in an email.
FedEx announced the pricing change seven months in advance because it "believed this was the most effective way to give
customers adequate notice," Bunn said.
Because shipments cube out before they weigh out, carriers want to ensure that they are optimizing all the available space
aboard their delivery conveyances. A bulky, lightweight shipment can easily take up a disproportionate amount of space on a
truck, yet it may be charged a noncompensatory rate because its actual weight is relatively low.
At this point, shipper remedies may be limited. FedEx could take the intervening seven months to negotiate some relief for
their customers. And there is always the possibility that UPS may not follow suit, though consultants say that's unlikely given
the two carriers' near-monopoly in B2B traffic and very strong position in the B2C space. For UPS, the lure of a potentially
massive revenue surge from implementing a similar increase could outweigh the benefits of additional business from aggrieved
FedEx shippers, according to analysts.
FedEx Ground has reported significant growth in recent years as cost-conscious businesses continue to trade down to
less-expensive surface transportation and away from air freight. As part of a major companywide reorganization announced
in 2012, FedEx will expand the unit's capacity so it could handle 45 percent more shipments by its 2018 fiscal year.
Commercial fleet operators are steadily increasing their use of GPS fleet tracking, in-cab video solutions, and predictive analytics, driven by rising costs, evolving regulations, and competitive pressures, according to an industry report from Verizon Connect.
Those conclusions come from the company’s fifth annual “Fleet Technology Trends Report,” conducted in partnership with Bobit Business Media, and based on responses from 543 fleet management professionals.
The study showed that for five consecutive years, at least four out of five respondents have reported using at least one form of fleet technology, said Atlanta-based Verizon Connect, which provides fleet and mobile workforce management software platforms, embedded OEM hardware, and a connected vehicle device called Hum by Verizon.
The most commonly used of those technologies is GPS fleet tracking, with 69% of fleets across industries reporting its use, the survey showed. Of those users, 72% find it extremely or very beneficial, citing improved efficiency (62%) and a reduction in harsh driving/speeding events (49%).
Respondents also reported a focus on safety, with 57% of respondents citing improved driver safety as a key benefit of GPS fleet tracking. And 68% of users said in-cab video solutions are extremely or very beneficial. Together, those technologies help reduce distracted driving incidents, improve coaching sessions, and help reduce accident and insurance costs, Verizon Connect said.
Looking at the future, fleet management software is evolving to meet emerging challenges, including sustainability and electrification, the company said. "The findings from this year's Fleet Technology Trends Report highlight a strong commitment across industries to embracing fleet technology, with GPS tracking and in-cab video solutions consistently delivering measurable results,” Peter Mitchell, General Manager, Verizon Connect, said in a release. “As fleets face rising costs and increased regulatory pressures, these technologies are proving to be indispensable in helping organizations optimize their operations, reduce expenses, and navigate the path toward a more sustainable future.”
Businesses engaged in international trade face three major supply chain hurdles as they head into 2025: the disruptions caused by Chinese New Year (CNY), the looming threat of potential tariffs on foreign-made products that could be imposed by the incoming Trump Administration, and the unresolved contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX), according to an analysis from trucking and logistics provider Averitt.
Each of those factors could lead to significant shipping delays, production slowdowns, and increased costs, Averitt said.
First, Chinese New Year 2025 begins on January 29, prompting factories across China and other regions to shut down for weeks, typically causing production to halt and freight demand to skyrocket. The ripple effects can range from increased shipping costs to extended lead times, disrupting even the most well-planned operations. To prepare for that event, shippers should place orders early, build inventory buffers, secure freight space in advance, diversify shipping modes, and communicate with logistics providers, Averitt said.
Second, new or increased tariffs on foreign-made goods could drive up the cost of imports, disrupt established supply chains, and create uncertainty in the marketplace. In turn, shippers may face freight rate volatility and capacity constraints as businesses rush to stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines. To navigate these challenges, shippers should prepare advance shipments and inventory stockpiling, diversity sourcing, negotiate supplier agreements, explore domestic production, and leverage financial strategies.
Third, unresolved contract negotiations between the ILA and the USMX will come to a head by January 15, when the current contract expires. Labor action or strikes could cause severe disruptions at East and Gulf Coast ports, triggering widespread delays and bottlenecks across the supply chain. To prepare for the worst, shippers should adopt a similar strategy to the other potential January threats: collaborate early, secure freight, diversify supply chains, and monitor policy changes.
According to Averitt, companies can cushion the impact of all three challenges by deploying a seamless, end-to-end solution covering the entire path from customs clearance to final-mile delivery. That strategy can help businesses to store inventory closer to their customers, mitigate delays, and reduce costs associated with supply chain disruptions. And combined with proactive communication and real-time visibility tools, the approach allows companies to maintain control and keep their supply chains resilient in the face of global uncertainties, Averitt said.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.