Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
If you knew next to nothing about the United States and were handed a map and asked to pick one state to locate a distribution center in, chances are you'd choose Missouri. That's because the state is close to the geographic center of the country. Simply put: It's in the middle of it all.
"It's just the perfect location," says Billy Cartwright, senior director of operations for Con-way Truckload, which has been located in Joplin, Mo., since 1951.
But it's not just about Missouri's central location. The state offers other logistics-related advantages as well. What follows are four additional reasons why companies should consider locating a DC in Missouri (and one reason why they might want to take a pass).
1. Kick-ass infrastructure. It's not enough for a distribution center to be centrally located. Companies must also be able to move goods in and out easily. "You have to have well-connected, high-quality infrastructure, preferably with multiple transportation modes," says Chris Chung, CEO of the economic development organization Missouri Partnership.
Missouri certainly has that. The state boasts one of the largest road systems in the U.S., containing no fewer than seven major interstates: I-70, I-64, I-55, I-44, I-35, I-25, and I-49. Trucks traveling those highways can reach their destinations quickly: The majority of the country is within a two- to three-day drive of Missouri, and 50 percent of the country's manufacturers are only a day's drive away.
Furthermore, the state is served by all seven Class I railroads, offers rail access to both the East and West coasts, and houses not one but two of the country's largest rail centers. According to the Association of American Railroads, Kansas City is the second largest rail center by number of railcars, and St. Louis is the third largest.
The state also offers robust intermodal connections—a plus for companies looking to broaden their transportation options beyond trucking. For example, there are two intermodal facilities near Kansas City that are currently undergoing expansion: a Norfolk Southern facility run by the Rockefeller Group and the CenterPoint-Kansas City Southern Intermodal Center.
As for air-freight options, both the Kansas City and St. Louis airports offer international service, and the Springfield airport has a U.S. Customs port of entry. From Missouri, air freight can reach most cities in the United States and Canada in three hours or less, according to Chung.
While the landlocked state has no seaports, its inland waterways are hard to match, as Missouri is served by both the Missouri and the Mississippi rivers. "Something not every state has," says Chung dryly.
The Port of Metropolitan St. Louis is the second largest inland port by tonnage and moves 33 million tons of mostly bulk commodities annually. The St. Louis port is also the northernmost "ice free" port on the Mississippi River.
"All four modes are here, with not only great physical infrastructure but also the services themselves to support the movement of a distribution center's freight in and out," says Chris Gutierrez, president of KC SmartPort, an economic development organization that focuses on the Kansas City area.
These services include not only offices and regional facilities for all major third-party logistics service providers, warehouse operators, and motor carriers but also the headquarters of several key logistics companies. For example, Joplin, Mo., is the home of Con-way Truckload; Kansas City Southern Railway is located in Kansas City; and the major 3PL Graybar is headquartered in St. Louis.
All of this adds up to what CNBC rates as the fifth best transportation infrastructure in the country.
2. A business-friendly environment. Missouri also boasts a tax environment that's favorable to business. The state has a low personal property tax and no inventory tax, according to Chung. Forbes magazine ranks Missouri as having the ninth-best business regulatory environment in the country, and the Tax Foundation rated the state seventh best in terms of corporate taxes. According to Pollina Corporate Real Estate Inc., which compiles an annual ranking of states based on how well they've positioned themselves to create and retain jobs, Missouri is the ninth most "pro-business" state in the country.
"The state aggressively rewards companies that invest in the state and create jobs," says Chung.
On top of that, the state has low energy costs. According to Chung, it offers some of the lowest industrial electricity prices in the country, which makes it particularly attractive to companies needing cold storage facilities.
The one area where Missouri can't match its Midwest neighbors is tax abatement. Illinois, for example, offers a property tax reduction or exemption to DCs that locate in one of the state's large distribution parks. There are few such facilities in Missouri where companies can receive similar breaks, says Geoffrey R. Orf, senior director for the industrial real estate firm Cushman & Wakefield in St. Louis.
3. A seasoned workforce. With its workforce of 3 million, Missouri has never had a problem providing the labor needed to staff distribution centers, according to Chung. "We are able to serve DCs that just need a dozen people and larger DCs that may need hundreds or thousands," he says.
Missouri's workforce not only has the numbers, but also the skills. Schools such as Missouri State, the University of Missouri, and St. Louis University all have bachelor's and in some cases, master's degree programs in logistics or supply chain management. The state also has 19 community colleges that work regularly with industry to develop the skills businesses seek, according to Chung.
There are even supply chain education programs that reach down into the high schools. KC SmartPort, for example, works with a program called Prep-KC to expose students, guidance counselors, and teachers to career opportunities in supply chain and logistics. Transportation and supply chain professionals are brought into the school to talk about the field, and students can take distribution and logistics classes at the high school for college credit.
On top of that, the Department of Economic Development runs a statewide training program known as Missouri Works. This incentive program is designed to provide training resources and assistance to businesses in order to help them cut training costs and boost productivity.
Occasionally, companies evaluating potential DC sites in Missouri will express concern about the state's strong union presence, says Orf. Those worries are misplaced, he says. Studies have found that worker productivity levels in Missouri tend to be higher than in states with a smaller union presence, according to Orf. "While the wage rate might be higher here than in other Midwest states," he says, "the productivity level of our warehousing and transportation workers is also higher."
Part of the explanation for those high productivity levels may be cultural. Many speak of Missouri's "Midwest work ethic," which can be seen not only in day-to-day operations but also in the face of disaster. As an example, Cartwright of Con-way Truckload cites the way the community of Joplin pulled together to rebuild the city after it was flattened by tornadoes in 2011. "I've been in a couple of tornadoes," says Cartwright. "It's always been interesting how the community bonds together and helps each other. I guess that's part of the feeling of Midwest fellowship."
4. Ability to serve diverse types of businesses. Unlike many other Midwestern states, Missouri's economy isn't dominated by a single industry—think Michigan and the automotive business or Kansas and aircraft manufacturing. Instead, Missouri serves a varied array of businesses. According to Chung, the state's mix of businesses puts it in the top five in the country where diversity is concerned. "As a result, we are able to respond to and accommodate the needs of many types of companies, from retail to industrial products to manufacturing to food companies," he says.
In addition, the state has a wide range of locations that can meet the needs of a distribution center. Kansas City and St. Louis, the state's two large urban areas, provide a large population base and extensive transportation infrastructure. But there are also "second-tier" locations (communities with populations of 20,000 or more) scattered across the state that can provide the staffing levels needed for a DC, says Chung. "All are located on top of at least one major interstate," he says.
As examples, he cites Springfield and Joplin, located in the southwest corner of the state; Columbia and Jefferson City in the middle of the state; Sikeston in the southeast; and Hannibal in the northeast along the Mississippi River.
"With a couple of minor exceptions, almost all communities in the state would be able to provide the workforce needed as well as access to the necessary physical infrastructure and transportation modes," says Chung.
MAIN DISADVANTAGE: BEING IN THE FLYOVER
It would be unrealistic to claim that every distribution network should have a facility in Missouri. Indeed, companies looking to locate close to the country's major population centers, particularly those on the East and West coasts, might want to look elsewhere.
KC SmartPort's Gutierrez puts it this way: Missouri works best for companies that operate a distribution network with an odd number of DCs. Think about it: If you plan to serve the entire continental U.S. from a single distribution center, it makes sense to locate it in the middle of the country. If you want to have two distribution centers, however, it makes more sense to locate one on each coast. If you raise that number to three, you're back to needing a DC in the middle of the country. Go up to four, and the equation once again shifts.
But if a central location is key to your distribution strategy, it's a good bet Missouri will wind up on your short list.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."