Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
It's springtime, and as per usual in the less-than-truckload (LTL) industry, general rate increases (GRIs)—adjustments
that apply to cargo not moving under contracts—are busting out all over. Six of the biggest LTL carriers—FedEx Freight,
UPS Freight, YRC Freight, ABF Freight System Inc., Con-way Freight, and SAIA—have already hiked their tariffs to varying
degrees.
But the latest round isn't over yet. That's because the big dog hasn't barked.
Old Dominion Freight Line Inc., by almost every measure the nation's most successful LTL carrier, has, at this writing, not
announced its intentions. That, in and of itself, is not unusual. Old Dominion is usually the last or one of the last carriers
to disclose tariff adjustments, more commonly known as GRIs. These changes generally affect 25 to 30 percent
of a carrier's book of business; at Old Dominion, that figure is around 25 percent.
Some, like David G. Ross, analyst for Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., argue that the GRIs are insignificant because much of the
hike can still get negotiated away. Ross cites the example of Con-Way, whose last six GRIs dating back to January 2010, resulted
in a 37-percent aggregate increase in tariff rates. However, Con-way's overall yield, including the impact of fuel surcharges,
rose 23 percent during that time, according to Ross. The disparity indicates that "real pricing is much lower than these announced
rate increases," he wrote in a note.
Still, carriers prize the GRI business because it represents small to mid-size companies, which are the carriers'
most profitable accounts and often subsidize the large customers, which leverage their volumes to extract big price
concessions during contract talks.
If history is any guide, Old Dominion will price its tariffs at the low end of the industry's current range, which has
so far been set at 3.9 percent by FedEx Freight, a unit of FedEx Corp. and the nation's largest LTL carrier. Old Dominion
reports first-quarter results on April 24.
PRICING WAR AFTERMATH
In each of the past three years, Thomasville, N.C.-based Old Dominion raised its tariffs by 4.9 percent, effectively
underpricing most of its rivals during that period. Old Dominion had the luxury of coming in low because it stayed out
of
the bottom line-busting price wars of 2009 as carriers desperately tried to defend their market share and grab share from
rivals in a recession-wracked economy. Another motive at the time was to undercut financially ailing YRC Worldwide Inc.
in an effort to force the then-market leader out of business and take capacity out of the market. The strategy didn't drive
YRC to the sidelines and succeeded only in damaging the profit margins of several of the carriers who tried the scheme.
Chip Overbey, Old Dominion's senior vice president, strategic planning, said in an e-mail that the company's past GRIs were
driven more by a desire to balance price and service rather than a change in philosophy to become more aggressive on rates. "We
do not knowingly price business to chase volume at the expense of a price," he said.
Still, Overbey notes that the company had latitude its rivals lacked. In 2009, "we did not dig the same pricing hole as did
many of our competitors," he said. "Therefore, we did not need a significantly higher GRI to recoup the pricing [or] margins
previously given away during that period."
Some might argue, though, that Old Dominion is now out to put the hammer down on pricing in a drive to attract tonnage.
Data recently published on
Seeking Alpha, a financial website, showed that Old Dominion's fourth-quarter yield, or
"revenue per hundredweight"—which many consider the metric to define a carrier's pricing strategy—declined slightly
from year-earlier levels. Fourth-quarter tonnage, though, rose nearly 11 percent. By contrast, Con-way, ABF, and Saia showed gains
in revenue per hundredweight over that period. However, none reported tonnage increases of more than 2.9 percent. The website data
reflects Old Dominion's "aggressive stance" in going after tonnage and, by extension, market
share.
Not necessarily so, said Overbey. Old Dominion's yield is influenced by multiple factors such as price, a shipment's
weight and density, its length-of-haul, and any unique handling characteristics, he said. Revenue-per-hundredweight data "is a
very dynamic measure, and it is not a complete or accurate measure of pricing," he said. Changes in the carrier's freight mix, as
well as other shifts in the variables of Old Dominion's business, can alter its yield measurement on a day-to-day or
month-to-month basis, he said. As a result, yield fluctuations "cannot be construed as a change in pricing strategy," he said.
Interpretations aside, Old Dominion hasn't found it hard to attract business. Earlier this year, it estimated that
first-quarter tonnage would grow between 11 and 11.5 percent from year-earlier levels. January tonnage rose 11.6 percent
year-over-year, followed by an 11.7-percent increase in February. March's data has not been released. For 2013, Old Dominion's
revenue rose 9.5 percent to $2.34 billion, while net income climbed 21.6 percent to $206.1 million.
The latest spate of GRIs comes amid a solid pricing climate for LTL carriers. William Greene, lead transport analyst at Morgan
Stanley & Co., noted that the current round of increases occurred only nine months after the last cycle, as opposed to the 10 to
12 months seen in recent prior cycles. This is a positive for pricing as carriers feel emboldened—partly because of weather-related
capacity tightening and partly because of firmer demand—to raise rates at faster intervals than before, Greene said. Ross of
Stifel said that, overall, carriers should expect to see 3-percent rate increases for 2014, net of fuel surcharges.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."