Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
It's springtime, and as per usual in the less-than-truckload (LTL) industry, general rate increases (GRIs)—adjustments
that apply to cargo not moving under contracts—are busting out all over. Six of the biggest LTL carriers—FedEx Freight,
UPS Freight, YRC Freight, ABF Freight System Inc., Con-way Freight, and SAIA—have already hiked their tariffs to varying
degrees.
But the latest round isn't over yet. That's because the big dog hasn't barked.
Old Dominion Freight Line Inc., by almost every measure the nation's most successful LTL carrier, has, at this writing, not
announced its intentions. That, in and of itself, is not unusual. Old Dominion is usually the last or one of the last carriers
to disclose tariff adjustments, more commonly known as GRIs. These changes generally affect 25 to 30 percent
of a carrier's book of business; at Old Dominion, that figure is around 25 percent.
Some, like David G. Ross, analyst for Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., argue that the GRIs are insignificant because much of the
hike can still get negotiated away. Ross cites the example of Con-Way, whose last six GRIs dating back to January 2010, resulted
in a 37-percent aggregate increase in tariff rates. However, Con-way's overall yield, including the impact of fuel surcharges,
rose 23 percent during that time, according to Ross. The disparity indicates that "real pricing is much lower than these announced
rate increases," he wrote in a note.
Still, carriers prize the GRI business because it represents small to mid-size companies, which are the carriers'
most profitable accounts and often subsidize the large customers, which leverage their volumes to extract big price
concessions during contract talks.
If history is any guide, Old Dominion will price its tariffs at the low end of the industry's current range, which has
so far been set at 3.9 percent by FedEx Freight, a unit of FedEx Corp. and the nation's largest LTL carrier. Old Dominion
reports first-quarter results on April 24.
PRICING WAR AFTERMATH
In each of the past three years, Thomasville, N.C.-based Old Dominion raised its tariffs by 4.9 percent, effectively
underpricing most of its rivals during that period. Old Dominion had the luxury of coming in low because it stayed out
of
the bottom line-busting price wars of 2009 as carriers desperately tried to defend their market share and grab share from
rivals in a recession-wracked economy. Another motive at the time was to undercut financially ailing YRC Worldwide Inc.
in an effort to force the then-market leader out of business and take capacity out of the market. The strategy didn't drive
YRC to the sidelines and succeeded only in damaging the profit margins of several of the carriers who tried the scheme.
Chip Overbey, Old Dominion's senior vice president, strategic planning, said in an e-mail that the company's past GRIs were
driven more by a desire to balance price and service rather than a change in philosophy to become more aggressive on rates. "We
do not knowingly price business to chase volume at the expense of a price," he said.
Still, Overbey notes that the company had latitude its rivals lacked. In 2009, "we did not dig the same pricing hole as did
many of our competitors," he said. "Therefore, we did not need a significantly higher GRI to recoup the pricing [or] margins
previously given away during that period."
Some might argue, though, that Old Dominion is now out to put the hammer down on pricing in a drive to attract tonnage.
Data recently published on
Seeking Alpha, a financial website, showed that Old Dominion's fourth-quarter yield, or
"revenue per hundredweight"—which many consider the metric to define a carrier's pricing strategy—declined slightly
from year-earlier levels. Fourth-quarter tonnage, though, rose nearly 11 percent. By contrast, Con-way, ABF, and Saia showed gains
in revenue per hundredweight over that period. However, none reported tonnage increases of more than 2.9 percent. The website data
reflects Old Dominion's "aggressive stance" in going after tonnage and, by extension, market
share.
Not necessarily so, said Overbey. Old Dominion's yield is influenced by multiple factors such as price, a shipment's
weight and density, its length-of-haul, and any unique handling characteristics, he said. Revenue-per-hundredweight data "is a
very dynamic measure, and it is not a complete or accurate measure of pricing," he said. Changes in the carrier's freight mix, as
well as other shifts in the variables of Old Dominion's business, can alter its yield measurement on a day-to-day or
month-to-month basis, he said. As a result, yield fluctuations "cannot be construed as a change in pricing strategy," he said.
Interpretations aside, Old Dominion hasn't found it hard to attract business. Earlier this year, it estimated that
first-quarter tonnage would grow between 11 and 11.5 percent from year-earlier levels. January tonnage rose 11.6 percent
year-over-year, followed by an 11.7-percent increase in February. March's data has not been released. For 2013, Old Dominion's
revenue rose 9.5 percent to $2.34 billion, while net income climbed 21.6 percent to $206.1 million.
The latest spate of GRIs comes amid a solid pricing climate for LTL carriers. William Greene, lead transport analyst at Morgan
Stanley & Co., noted that the current round of increases occurred only nine months after the last cycle, as opposed to the 10 to
12 months seen in recent prior cycles. This is a positive for pricing as carriers feel emboldened—partly because of weather-related
capacity tightening and partly because of firmer demand—to raise rates at faster intervals than before, Greene said. Ross of
Stifel said that, overall, carriers should expect to see 3-percent rate increases for 2014, net of fuel surcharges.
Container traffic is finally back to typical levels at the port of Montreal, two months after dockworkers returned to work following a strike, port officials said Thursday.
Today that arbitration continues as the two sides work to forge a new contract. And port leaders with the Maritime Employers Association (MEA) are reminding workers represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) that the CIRB decision “rules out any pressure tactics affecting operations until the next collective agreement expires.”
The Port of Montreal alone said it had to manage a backlog of about 13,350 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) on the ground, as well as 28,000 feet of freight cars headed for export.
Port leaders this week said they had now completed that task. “Two months after operations fully resumed at the Port of Montreal, as directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, the Montreal Port Authority (MPA) is pleased to announce that all port activities are now completely back to normal. Both the impact of the labour dispute and the subsequent resumption of activities required concerted efforts on the part of all port partners to get things back to normal as quickly as possible, even over the holiday season,” the port said in a release.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.