Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
It's springtime, and as per usual in the less-than-truckload (LTL) industry, general rate increases (GRIs)—adjustments
that apply to cargo not moving under contracts—are busting out all over. Six of the biggest LTL carriers—FedEx Freight,
UPS Freight, YRC Freight, ABF Freight System Inc., Con-way Freight, and SAIA—have already hiked their tariffs to varying
degrees.
But the latest round isn't over yet. That's because the big dog hasn't barked.
Old Dominion Freight Line Inc., by almost every measure the nation's most successful LTL carrier, has, at this writing, not
announced its intentions. That, in and of itself, is not unusual. Old Dominion is usually the last or one of the last carriers
to disclose tariff adjustments, more commonly known as GRIs. These changes generally affect 25 to 30 percent
of a carrier's book of business; at Old Dominion, that figure is around 25 percent.
Some, like David G. Ross, analyst for Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., argue that the GRIs are insignificant because much of the
hike can still get negotiated away. Ross cites the example of Con-Way, whose last six GRIs dating back to January 2010, resulted
in a 37-percent aggregate increase in tariff rates. However, Con-way's overall yield, including the impact of fuel surcharges,
rose 23 percent during that time, according to Ross. The disparity indicates that "real pricing is much lower than these announced
rate increases," he wrote in a note.
Still, carriers prize the GRI business because it represents small to mid-size companies, which are the carriers'
most profitable accounts and often subsidize the large customers, which leverage their volumes to extract big price
concessions during contract talks.
If history is any guide, Old Dominion will price its tariffs at the low end of the industry's current range, which has
so far been set at 3.9 percent by FedEx Freight, a unit of FedEx Corp. and the nation's largest LTL carrier. Old Dominion
reports first-quarter results on April 24.
PRICING WAR AFTERMATH
In each of the past three years, Thomasville, N.C.-based Old Dominion raised its tariffs by 4.9 percent, effectively
underpricing most of its rivals during that period. Old Dominion had the luxury of coming in low because it stayed out
of
the bottom line-busting price wars of 2009 as carriers desperately tried to defend their market share and grab share from
rivals in a recession-wracked economy. Another motive at the time was to undercut financially ailing YRC Worldwide Inc.
in an effort to force the then-market leader out of business and take capacity out of the market. The strategy didn't drive
YRC to the sidelines and succeeded only in damaging the profit margins of several of the carriers who tried the scheme.
Chip Overbey, Old Dominion's senior vice president, strategic planning, said in an e-mail that the company's past GRIs were
driven more by a desire to balance price and service rather than a change in philosophy to become more aggressive on rates. "We
do not knowingly price business to chase volume at the expense of a price," he said.
Still, Overbey notes that the company had latitude its rivals lacked. In 2009, "we did not dig the same pricing hole as did
many of our competitors," he said. "Therefore, we did not need a significantly higher GRI to recoup the pricing [or] margins
previously given away during that period."
Some might argue, though, that Old Dominion is now out to put the hammer down on pricing in a drive to attract tonnage.
Data recently published on
Seeking Alpha, a financial website, showed that Old Dominion's fourth-quarter yield, or
"revenue per hundredweight"—which many consider the metric to define a carrier's pricing strategy—declined slightly
from year-earlier levels. Fourth-quarter tonnage, though, rose nearly 11 percent. By contrast, Con-way, ABF, and Saia showed gains
in revenue per hundredweight over that period. However, none reported tonnage increases of more than 2.9 percent. The website data
reflects Old Dominion's "aggressive stance" in going after tonnage and, by extension, market
share.
Not necessarily so, said Overbey. Old Dominion's yield is influenced by multiple factors such as price, a shipment's
weight and density, its length-of-haul, and any unique handling characteristics, he said. Revenue-per-hundredweight data "is a
very dynamic measure, and it is not a complete or accurate measure of pricing," he said. Changes in the carrier's freight mix, as
well as other shifts in the variables of Old Dominion's business, can alter its yield measurement on a day-to-day or
month-to-month basis, he said. As a result, yield fluctuations "cannot be construed as a change in pricing strategy," he said.
Interpretations aside, Old Dominion hasn't found it hard to attract business. Earlier this year, it estimated that
first-quarter tonnage would grow between 11 and 11.5 percent from year-earlier levels. January tonnage rose 11.6 percent
year-over-year, followed by an 11.7-percent increase in February. March's data has not been released. For 2013, Old Dominion's
revenue rose 9.5 percent to $2.34 billion, while net income climbed 21.6 percent to $206.1 million.
The latest spate of GRIs comes amid a solid pricing climate for LTL carriers. William Greene, lead transport analyst at Morgan
Stanley & Co., noted that the current round of increases occurred only nine months after the last cycle, as opposed to the 10 to
12 months seen in recent prior cycles. This is a positive for pricing as carriers feel emboldened—partly because of weather-related
capacity tightening and partly because of firmer demand—to raise rates at faster intervals than before, Greene said. Ross of
Stifel said that, overall, carriers should expect to see 3-percent rate increases for 2014, net of fuel surcharges.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."