If the results of our annual salary survey are any indication, the economy is indeed bouncing back—and bringing logistics professionals' compensation along with it.
We may be in a "jobless recovery" and the 2013 holiday shopping season may have been a disappointing one for many retailers, but with the housing market gaining traction, industrial production on the upswing, and the U.S. economy improving in many other respects, it's not surprising that U.S. consumer confidence is up—way up. In fact, the monthly average for the Reuters/University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index for 2013 was the highest since 2007.
Readers of DC Velocity have their own reason to feel upbeat about their economic circumstances: In 2013, the average compensation for respondents to our annual salary survey was $119,538—up 10 percent over last year's average. The median, or the midpoint of all salaries reported, was $102,000, up from $90,000 the previous year. While the mix of respondents who participate in the survey in any particular year will have a big impact on the average numbers, there's no question that the majority of survey takers are better off than they were a year ago. Well over two-thirds (69 percent) of the 443 qualified respondents said their annual compensation increased last year. In terms of size, those raises remained flat, though—a little above 6 percent on average, slightly higher than the previous year. Meanwhile, about one-fourth (26 percent) said their salaries had stayed the same. And just 5 percent said they were making less money in 2013 than they did the year before, the smallest percentage since before the Great Recession.
All of those numbers are an improvement over the previous survey's responses. Last year, 62 percent of respondents said they had received raises in 2012, 31 percent said their salaries had stayed the same, and 7 percent took pay cuts. That continues a pattern we've seen since 2010: more respondents reporting raises, and fewer and fewer reporting stagnant or declining salaries. The steady drop in respondents who suffered pay cuts suggests that fewer readers are out of work or are being forced to take lower-paying jobs these days.
PUTTING IN THE TIME
Their compensation may be on the way up, but readers certainly are not sitting back and enjoying their raises. In fact, they seem to be working harder than ever. Only 20 percent of those who took part in the survey said they worked 45 hours or less during the average week. Another 70 percent said they typically worked 46 to 60 hours a week (including time spent working outside the office). A no-doubt-exhausted 10 percent said they're devoting more than 60 hours a week to their jobs. And it doesn't seem to matter much what your title, industry, or location may be—with 92 percent of respondents reporting that their work hours had increased or stayed the same over the previous three years, it's clear that almost everyone is putting in their time, and then some.
One possible reason for the long hours is that most of the respondents have more responsibilities than they did in the past. Sixty-four percent of the survey participants reported that the number of functions they manage has increased over the past three years. Another 32 percent said their responsibilities had stayed the same, and just 4 percent reported a decrease. It's rare, moreover, for a reader to be responsible for a single function. Fewer than two-dozen of the survey takers said they have one functional responsibility, and more than half said they are responsible for three or more of the six functions mentioned in the survey. The greater the number of functions you oversee, of course, the more people to manage. No surprise, then, that nearly two-thirds (64 percent) of the survey respondents said they had five or more direct reports.
Another reason why DCV readers work so hard is that on average, 18 percent of their compensation is based on their performance. Vice presidents, directors, and managers in the third-party logistics, wholesale, and transportation businesses are most likely to have 50 percent or more of their pay based on performance.
With respondents reporting a wide range of titles and responsibilities, it's inevitable that our survey would show a significant range in salaries. Which titles pay the most on average? Corporate officers were at the top of the salary ladder. The average salary for C-level respondents was $250,364—considerably higher than the average salary of vice presidents, who at $181,077 were better paid than presidents and directors. They reported average salaries of $146,892 and $124,630, respectively.
From there, it's a big drop down to the lower levels. Managers made over $37,000 less than directors, and supervisors earned approximately $23,000 less than managers. Exhibit 1 shows the average salary for each title.
EXPERIENCE, EDUCATION COUNT
Job title may carry the most weight, but many other factors influence how much an individual logistics or supply chain professional makes. The region where you work, which industry you work in, your level of education, and how long you've been in the business will typically play a big role in determining your salary.
Let's start with education. Did your parents advise you to go to college so you'd make more money? They knew what they were talking about. Exhibit 2 illustrates the strong correlation between earnings and education. The average salary for respondents with only a high school diploma was $97,450. It was a big step up from there to a bachelor's degree—the highest level of education for nearly half of the survey respondents; those respondents took home an average salary of $121,113. A master's degree (either in the field or in business) was worth an additional $24,000.
Experience in the field also influences earnings (see Exhibit 3). The average salary of newcomers to the profession (those with five or fewer years of experience in logistics) was $85,620, while the median for that group was a respectable $77,000. Once you get up in the range of 16 years or more of logistics experience, both the average and the median salaries climb to well above $100,000. With an average salary of $148,675 and a median of $120,000, those who have been in the business longest (respondents with more than 25 years' experience) command a hefty premium for their expertise.
As Exhibit 4 shows, which industry you work in can have an enormous impact on your salary. Since nearly half of respondents are at the director level or above, it's not surprising that most of the industry averages exceed $100,000. The highest-paying industries include such high-growth sectors as third-party logistics ($160,357), pharmaceutical and health care ($136,526), and apparel and footwear ($136,569). On the opposite end of the scale are the perennially lower-paying industries like furniture and fixtures, at $87,222, and government and military, at $69,605.
There have always been significant differences in pay scales among the various geographic regions, and that continues to be true, as Exhibit 5 makes clear. The highest average pay, $141,981, was in the Southeast, home to some of the fastest-growing manufacturing and distribution areas in the country. The Midwest—still America's industrial heartland, with 38 percent of survey respondents—was next, at $123,846. New England reported the lowest average salary, the only region that came in at less than $100,000.
AGE HAS ITS REWARDS
A potpourri of other factors can have an influence on salaries. Our survey found that a respondent's age and gender, and the size of the company he or she works for can also make a difference.
Take age, for example. It's logical that salaries should increase with age, and that's exactly what the survey results showed. Younger folks—those in the 26-35 age range—averaged a respectable $88,730. Middle age has its rewards, though. Respondents aged 36 to 45 reported average salaries of $103,022, and the next bracket (46-55) made about $16,000 more. Those who stick with this profession for the long haul will be rewarded: Elder statesmen (and women) age 56 and older, the majority of whom have higher-level positions, earned average salaries of $133,650.
For as long as logistics industry salary surveys have been around, women have lagged behind men in terms of their compensation, and this year was no different. Female respondents earned an average of $84,601, while male respondents reported an average salary of $123,489—a difference of nearly $40,000, or 32 percent. That difference can be attributed in large part to less education, lower positions, and fewer years of experience than their male counterparts. One-third of female respondents had a high school education only, and just five of the women survey takers held vice president titles. Sixty-one percent of the women who responded to this year's survey had 15 years' experience or less, compared with 28 percent of the men.
The size of the company you work for makes a difference in your salary. As you might expect, small businesses—those with fewer than 100 employees—pay the least, an average salary of $92,277. Working for a larger company will get you a larger salary—at least $20,000 more for this year's respondents. Working for the largest corporations (those with more than 5,000 employees) does not guarantee the highest salaries, though. Respondents who worked for companies with between 500 and 1,000 employees did best, with an average salary of $157,350.
UPWARD BOUND?
As anyone who's ever undergone a salary review well knows, there are countless variables that might influence a person's compensation—not just the many factors mentioned above, but also such considerations as job performance, departmental budget, internal politics, and perks and benefits, to name a few.
But it's also clear that salaries reflect overall economic conditions. As orders and shipping volumes continue to climb, e-commerce expands, and more manufacturing returns to North America, demand for capable, knowledgeable logistics and supply chain talent will also continue to grow. And that means the size of their paychecks is likely to stay on an upward trajectory for some time to come.
What makes you happy ... or not?
As part of this year's annual salary survey, we asked respondents how they feel about their profession: Are they satisfied with their choice? Would they recommend it to others? What do they like most about their jobs? What do they like least? Here's a quick look at what they had to say.
The vast majority of respondents—88 percent—are satisfied with their career in logistics. Just 12 percent regret their choice. The same percentages said they would recommend the profession to a young person (or not).
Respondents like the logistics profession's fast pace; the variety of responsibilities, projects, and challenges; and its dynamic and flexible nature. "There's always a new challenge, and what worked yesterday may not work tomorrow," said one survey taker. Another likes "the ability to effect change, set strategy, and impact decision making."
There were plenty of complaints, too. Compliance with constantly changing regulations, being stretched too thin with inadequate resources, bureaucracy and politics, corporate roadblocks to efficiency and productivity, and the failure to understand logistics' contributions were among the things respondents like least about their jobs.
What would make survey takers happier in their work (besides a raise)? Some responses were specific to the individual, such as more vacation time, less travel, and more reasonable work hours. "Either give me additional headcount or put me and my team on fewer projects," said one respondent. But many focused on broader concerns, such as having clear and achievable key performance indicators (KPIs); having access to more training—not just on functional responsibilities but also to enable upward mobility; improving internal teamwork and collaboration; and having upper management understand and value logistics and its contributions. One respondent would like to see his employer "focus more on long-term improvements and less on hitting quarterly numbers," while another wants "transparency as to strategy, vision, and communications."
Container traffic is finally back to typical levels at the port of Montreal, two months after dockworkers returned to work following a strike, port officials said Thursday.
Today that arbitration continues as the two sides work to forge a new contract. And port leaders with the Maritime Employers Association (MEA) are reminding workers represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) that the CIRB decision “rules out any pressure tactics affecting operations until the next collective agreement expires.”
The Port of Montreal alone said it had to manage a backlog of about 13,350 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) on the ground, as well as 28,000 feet of freight cars headed for export.
Port leaders this week said they had now completed that task. “Two months after operations fully resumed at the Port of Montreal, as directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, the Montreal Port Authority (MPA) is pleased to announce that all port activities are now completely back to normal. Both the impact of the labour dispute and the subsequent resumption of activities required concerted efforts on the part of all port partners to get things back to normal as quickly as possible, even over the holiday season,” the port said in a release.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.