Companies are losing millions of dollars' worth of pallets each year to pilferage or simple lack of accountability. Here are some tips on stemming the losses.
Susan Lacefield has been working for supply chain publications since 1999. Before joining DC VELOCITY, she was an associate editor for Supply Chain Management Review and wrote for Logistics Management magazine. She holds a master's degree in English.
It is far too easy for pallets to "leak" out of a supply chain. A pallet misplaced in the distribution center here. One never returned from a customer there. Another used for an in-store display. Yet another stuck "temporarily" in an offsite warehouse and then forgotten. A few more picked up by thieves in back of a retail store.
Taken individually, these losses might seem minor, but the problem of a few missing pallets can quickly add up to considerable cost. In fact, according to Mark Baum, chief collaboration officer and senior vice president of industry relations for the Food Marketing Institute, lost reusable packaging assets (which include not just pallets but also such things as dairy crates, beverage containers, rolling carts, and bread trays) end up costing American business $750 million to $1 billion each year.
And it's not just the pallet owners that feel the financial pain—inevitably those costs will be spread throughout the entire supply chain, according to Dan Gormley, vice president of asset control and retail services at CHEP, the largest rental pallet pooler in North America.
THE PALLET BLACK MARKET
A not insignificant source of that pallet loss is theft. While numbers are not definitive, Jerry Welcome, president of the Reusable Packaging Association, estimates that tens of millions of dollars' worth of reusable packaging and containers are stolen every year.
CHEP estimates that each year, about 1 million pallets travel through the black market. This includes pallets that are being stolen along with the product loaded on them, pallets being stolen alone, and pallets that are being "misused" (such as being made into furniture or fencing), says Gormley.
Most of the pallet theft is perpetrated by an individual thief picking up unattended pallets behind a store, according to Welcome. But there have been cases of organized crime rings stealing pallets and containers. These groups tend to target plastic pallets, milk crates, and bread trays, which they grind down into plastic pellets that are then sold to plastic manufacturers, typically overseas. Although the extent of the practice is unknown, the following statistics might shed some light on the situation: From 2011 until it ran out of funding in 2013, a Plastic Industrial Theft Taskforce run by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department recovered $7.4 million in stolen plastic pallets and containers, made 74 arrests, and shut down 30 illegal grinding operations.
While the rising cost of resin makes plastic pallets particularly vulnerable to theft, pallets made from wood and other materials are not immune. For example, in 2013, Upper Arlington, Ohio, near Columbus, experienced a rash of wooden pallet thefts from behind grocery stores. Indeed, the problem of wooden pallet theft is serious enough in CHEP's eyes that the company has an asset recovery team in the field that focuses on recovering lost and stolen pallets, and a separate asset protection team that educates pallet users and recyclers on CHEP's ownership rights for its products.
LOST IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN
Although theft clearly factors into the equation, Welcome and others believe that the majority of pallet losses stem from less nefarious causes. They happen simply because companies lack visibility of their assets' whereabouts in the supply chain, according to Norm Kukuk, vice president of marketing for Orbis Corp., a manufacturer of plastic pallets and other reusable packaging. "We really find that for most of our customers, 80 percent of what they thought was lost is actually somewhere in their own warehouse or their partners' warehouses," he says.
The main reason for loss is the sheer complexity of most supply chains. It might seem fairly simple—product is shipped on a reusable pallet (or container or other shipping platform) from company A to company B, and then empty pallets are shipped back from company B to company A. But the reality can be a lot more complicated. The product on the pallet could get damaged and the whole pallet could be diverted elsewhere with the damaged goods. The pallets could be sent to an offsite warehouse because of lack of storage space or end up being stored in a third-party logistics service provider's (3PL) warehouse.
Furthermore, in most cases, the pallets get returned at a slower pace than they are shipped out. Suppliers, customers, or 3PLs might be collecting the items until they have enough for a full truckload. While this reduces transportation costs, it also slows the return process. Or if a driver is supposed to pick up pallets or containers from a previous trip, he or she might not be given enough time on the route to track down and return the items. A "lost" asset may just be sitting idle, waiting to be returned.
Indeed, a certain amount of asset loss is inevitable, and it's unrealistic to expect 100 percent of your assets to be returned to you, says Welcome. But if your rate of loss creeps up above 10 percent, he adds, it might be time to take a closer look at your system.
KEEP YOUR EYE ON THE PALLET
Regardless of whether your pallets are disappearing due to loss or theft, improving the visibility of units within your supply chain is a good first step, says Kukuk. "You need to step back and look at all the different ship-to points and touch points," he says. "Just have a simple discussion around all the different alternatives for where a product could have gone next, whether it's a 3PL warehouse, your own warehouse, or back to your primary shipping point. From there, you can narrow down those spots where your product could be leaking out of your system."
The best way to track shipping assets is to maintain a simple pallet-out, pallet-back accounting system. Kukuk says that some of Orbis' customers have been successful using a credit and debt process. "They debit pallets out when they ship them to a supplier and don't credit them back in until they receive them back," he says.
While it is possible to manage this credit-debit process with paper and pencil, technology can certainly boost accuracy and efficiency. Some larger companies, such as plastic pallet pooler iGPS, have taken the step of tagging their pallets with RFID chips, while others have found success using bar codes. "We have many customers that do a good job controlling visibility just with simple bar coding, scanning ins and outs," says Kukuk.
Hand in hand with a tracking program comes the necessity of getting suppliers and other stakeholders, such as carriers and 3PLs, involved in reporting where the asset went and who they shipped it to, says Kukuk. Companies need to talk to their partners about how and when pallets and shipping containers will be returned to them. "For example, do you want them back in a full truckload like you sent them out, or do you want them back in smaller quantities? And if so, are you able to monitor and control that?" he says.
To get that buy-in, Kukuk says, it's important to remind outside partners "what's in it for them." For example, if there are cost savings associated with using reusable pallets or containers, Kukuk recommends finding a way to share those savings with your partners.
If the carrot doesn't work, there's always the stick, according to Kukuk. He reports that some shippers go so far as to charge their suppliers a deposit for the pallet or container, which is refunded to the supplier upon the asset's return.
While you may have less pull with customers that are receiving your pallets and containers, Welcome says suppliers need to work with their retailer customers to remind them that reusable pallets and containers belong to them and that if these assets are lost, it raises costs throughout the entire supply chain.
A NEED FOR MORE SOLUTIONS
Although the problem of pallet and reusable container loss has been around for a while, there seems to be increasing recognition that the industry needs better solutions for stopping the leakage.
Last year, CHEP formed a team to look for opportunities across the supply chain to maintain better control of its pallets. The team is starting to look at such things as how often pallets are being shipped to or from points other than the distribution center or retail store, and what role those points play in their customers' supply chains, says Gormley.
While company-specific programs are good, Welcome emphasizes the necessity of developing industrywide best practices. "There's a growing need for industry to coalesce around a solution, to identify good practices, and to share them with people," he says.
There are signs that's beginning to happen. The Food Marketing Institute, for one, is starting a joint industry effort with food manufacturers, reusable asset manufacturers, and service providers to establish best practices for tracking and retaining assets, evaluate possible technology solutions, and stem theft through both regulatory and legislative efforts as well as educating law enforcement agencies about the problem.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."