UTi Pharma knew its web of DCs could not keep up with business. Careful planning and construction of a new facility led to a healthy boost in productivity and left room for growth.
Peter Bradley is an award-winning career journalist with more than three decades of experience in both newspapers and national business magazines. His credentials include seven years as the transportation and supply chain editor at Purchasing Magazine and six years as the chief editor of Logistics Management.
Any time a resident of South Africa calls on a local pharmacy for a prescription medication, chances are the drug in question passed through a new 32,000-square-meter (344,445-square-foot) distribution center near Johannesburg operated by UTi Pharma, the company that distributes 55 percent of the pharmaceuticals in that country.
The story of how that facility came to be, consolidating several other operations, is a lesson in careful planning and execution. The process was not without hiccups—nothing that large could be—but the initiative has proved a remarkable success for the company.
UTi Pharma is the largest distributor of pharmaceuticals in the nation, managing shipments to 10,000 pharmacies, 400 private hospitals, 2,600 laboratories, 6,800 retailers, 400 wholesalers, 1,900 state-operated facilities, and 840 exporters. In other words, a vast customer base. It handles products on behalf of 41 local and multinational manufacturers of both brand name and generic products, including medical devices and products for human and animal health. That large customer base, along with rapid growth and the strict requirements for handling pharmaceuticals, were proving a challenge for UTi Pharma's existing DC network, leading the company to begin considering significant changes in 2009. The end result was the new DC.
The Meadowview facility, as it is called, is located in Gauteng province near Johannesburg, South Africa's largest city. The DC represents a major step forward for UTi Pharma's operations. The new building replaces eight of the nine DCs the company previously operated in the region. But its importance reaches far beyond consolidating operations. It brings together modern material handling and management techniques that allow compliance with the stringent requirements demanded of pharmaceutical distribution. It provides the company with space to grow over the next 10 years or so. It provides substantially faster throughput rates than the facilities it replaced while reducing manual processes and overall staffing. And it provides greater security than the company could guarantee in its formerly scattered operations, thus reducing shrinkage. Morne van Rensburg, general manager of projects and engineering, expects the remaining facility in the region, a cold-room operation, will be brought under the roof of the new DC by 2017.
GROWING PAINS
Back in 2009, the company, an operating unit of UTi Worldwide, was running a dozen distribution centers, nine of them located in and around the Gauteng region. The fact that the company had so many operations to begin with was a result of UTi's growth, both organic and through acquisitions, says van Rensburg, one of the three primary project managers on the development of the new DC. The company has averaged 13 percent growth every year since 2004.
"We ran out of space," van Rensburg says. "We were running at 95 percent. That meant we couldn't take new clients on. Just looking at generic growth, we would have been out of space by [the end of last year]." Changing business requirements also led UTi to look to develop a more modern and agile operation. The company's expectation was that order profiles were likely to shift, with a changing mix of pallet, unit, and case shipping. It needed an operation that could adapt quickly to changes in customers' demands.
All that led the company to begin the process of revamping its distribution, an undertaking that eventually led to its bringing the operations of eight of those nine DCs under one roof in the new highly automated DC.
But UTi was cautious in making changes, considering other options before making a major capital commitment to a new building. Throughout the process, UTi worked closely with Fortna, an international supply chain consulting firm whose services include distribution center planning. Fortna had long been a partner of UTi's, van Rensburg says.
The objective was to develop a distribution solution that would meet the company's requirements at least through 2025 at the projected growth rates of 13 percent a year, he explains. Sensitivity analysis was completed to understand requirements if growth were limited to 5 percent a year. Those analyses showed the company would require between 38,000 and 50,000 pallet locations by 2025. In addition to meeting growth requirements, the solution would need to provide for greater operational efficiency than the existing operating practices. Included in this were faster throughput, fewer manual processes, lower staff costs, improved security, and "greener" operations. It would have to comply with the most stringent requirements for pharmaceutical DCs demanded by UTi's own clients as well as the World Health Organization, the Medicines Control Council of South Africa, and the South African Pharmacy Council.
REVAMP, EXPAND, OR BUILD NEW?
The company first considered whether revamping or expanding existing operations would meet its requirements, but it soon determined that would not be feasible. At best, its analysis showed, by taking on an adjacent site at one of the facilities and installing a bulk automated storage and retrieval system (AS/RS), the existing operations could provide just under 30,000 pallet positions—far short of expected requirements. Further, adapting the existing facilities would not provide the flexible order picking systems needed. That led to the decision to explore construction of a greenfield facility—and building the business case to persuade UTi's board that the investment made sense.
As for how big the new facility would be, the initial design concept indicated that a 50,000-square-meter (538,195-square-foot) building would meet UTi's needs. In late 2009, the company began soliciting proposals from construction firms for the building and proposals from three major material handling equipment manufacturers it had worked with in the past for the equipment.
Van Rensburg emphasizes that UTi left it up to the equipment manufacturers to suggest what specific technology would work best. The initial design proposals came back in April 2010. Those proposals provided UTi with options that varied from a very-narrow-aisle operation to a wide-aisle concept to an AS/RS-centric operation. The AS/RS proposal had the lowest staff requirements of the three, would limit access to stock (important for security reasons), could be operated with the lights out in much of the building, and was overall, the lowest-cost solution, and that's what the company selected. The final design included a large bulk AS/RS, a cross-belt sorter, and other technologies.
The property developer broke ground in May 2011, and the facility began operations in October 2012. The old facilities were completely closed by February 2013. One key requirement in the process of shifting operations was to minimize disruption to daily activities. "That was quite interesting and quite stressful," van Rensburg says. "We distribute around 55 percent of all pharmaceuticals in South Africa. We could not disrupt the market." But in the end, the process worked. While there were some disruptions, he says, they were not significant.
Construction delays, though, did lead to one problem that in retrospect, the managers would have handled differently. Adrienne Youell, one of the UTi managers who led the project, explains that the original plan provided for three months of testing before opening the facility. But the construction delays cut into that time. And failure to vacate the facilities the company was leaving would have been costly. That forced UTi into running double shifts to complete the testing, a highly stressful period. "One big lesson we learned is to not make up time from construction delays in your testing phase," she says. Van Rensburg adds that if he had to do it again, he would have absorbed the costs for staying in the existing facilities a while longer.
ROOM FOR EXPANSION
But those problems are behind the company now. Today, the facility receives and puts away an average of 400 pallets a day. It is central to UTi Pharma's operations around the country, as all products bound either for customers or for other UTi Pharma DCs pass through the Meadowview distribution center. It is at Meadowview where imported goods reside during government-mandated quarantine periods.
The building, which is temperature- and humidity-controlled throughout, is divided into receiving, bulk storage, unit pick, and shipping areas. The 4,220-square-meter (45,424-square-foot) receiving area has a pallet conveyor that flows into the bulk storage AS/RS. Euro pallets, which measure 800 by 1,200 by 120 millimeters (31 by 47 by 5 inches), can go directly into the system. Non-Euro pallets must be repalletized first. The 10-aisle AS/RS has 38,400 pallet locations but is designed to be expanded to as many as 58,000. The unit-picking area adjacent to the AS/RS consists of 11 double-layer carousels feeding seven pick-to-tote stations.
The system uses weight validation in both the receiving and picking processes. In the unit-pick area, workers are offered a single product at a time, further reducing the opportunity for errors, according to Fortna. Compared with the previous operations, manual processes have been cut in half, with the automated processes sharply accelerating throughput. In fact, the pick-to-tote technology increased unit-picking productivity by 342 percent.
The planning and execution of the project may have been arduous, but the results indicate it was a worthwhile endeavor for UTi Pharma, providing the company with an efficient, productive, and secure facility with room to accommodate its continued rapid growth.
A move by federal regulators to reinforce requirements for broker transparency in freight transactions is stirring debate among transportation groups, after the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) published a “notice of proposed rulemaking” this week.
According to FMCSA, its draft rule would strive to make broker transparency more common, requiring greater sharing of the material information necessary for transportation industry parties to make informed business decisions and to support the efficient resolution of disputes.
The proposed rule titled “Transparency in Property Broker Transactions” would address what FMCSA calls the lack of access to information among shippers and motor carriers that can impact the fairness and efficiency of the transportation system, and would reframe broker transparency as a regulatory duty imposed on brokers, with the goal of deterring non-compliance. Specifically, the move would require brokers to keep electronic records, and require brokers to provide transaction records to motor carriers and shippers upon request and within 48 hours of that request.
Under federal regulatory processes, public comments on the move are due by January 21, 2025. However, transportation groups are not waiting on the sidelines to voice their opinions.
According to the Transportation Intermediaries Association (TIA), an industry group representing the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, the potential rule is “misguided overreach” that fails to address the more pressing issue of freight fraud. In TIA’s view, broker transparency regulation is “obsolete and un-American,” and has no place in today’s “highly transparent” marketplace. “This proposal represents a misguided focus on outdated and unnecessary regulations rather than tackling issues that genuinely threaten the safety and efficiency of our nation’s supply chains,” TIA said.
But trucker trade group the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) welcomed the proposed rule, which it said would ensure that brokers finally play by the rules. “We appreciate that FMCSA incorporated input from our petition, including a requirement to make records available electronically and emphasizing that brokers have a duty to comply with regulations. As FMCSA noted, broker transparency is necessary for a fair, efficient transportation system, and is especially important to help carriers defend themselves against alleged claims on a shipment,” OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in a statement.
Additional pushback came from the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), a network of transportation professionals in small business, which said the potential rule didn’t go far enough. “This is too little too late and is disappointing. It preserves the status quo, which caters to Big Broker & TIA. There is no question now that FMCSA has been captured by Big Broker. Truckers and carriers must now come out in droves and file comments in full force against this starting tomorrow,” SBTC executive director James Lamb said in a LinkedIn post.
The “series B” funding round was financed by an unnamed “strategic customer” as well as Teradyne Robotics Ventures, Toyota Ventures, Ranpak, Third Kind Venture Capital, One Madison Group, Hyperplane, Catapult Ventures, and others.
The fresh backing comes as Massachusetts-based Pickle reported a spate of third quarter orders, saying that six customers placed orders for over 30 production robots to deploy in the first half of 2025. The new orders include pilot conversions, existing customer expansions, and new customer adoption.
“Pickle is hitting its strides delivering innovation, development, commercial traction, and customer satisfaction. The company is building groundbreaking technology while executing on essential recurring parts of a successful business like field service and manufacturing management,” Omar Asali, Pickle board member and CEO of investor Ranpak, said in a release.
According to Pickle, its truck-unloading robot applies “Physical AI” technology to one of the most labor-intensive, physically demanding, and highest turnover work areas in logistics operations. The platform combines a powerful vision system with generative AI foundation models trained on millions of data points from real logistics and warehouse operations that enable Pickle’s robotic hardware platform to perform physical work at human-scale or better, the company says.
Bloomington, Indiana-based FTR said its Trucking Conditions Index declined in September to -2.47 from -1.39 in August as weakness in the principal freight dynamics – freight rates, utilization, and volume – offset lower fuel costs and slightly less unfavorable financing costs.
Those negative numbers are nothing new—the TCI has been positive only twice – in May and June of this year – since April 2022, but the group’s current forecast still envisions consistently positive readings through at least a two-year forecast horizon.
“Aside from a near-term boost mostly related to falling diesel prices, we have not changed our Trucking Conditions Index forecast significantly in the wake of the election,” Avery Vise, FTR’s vice president of trucking, said in a release. “The outlook continues to be more favorable for carriers than what they have experienced for well over two years. Our analysis indicates gradual but steadily rising capacity utilization leading to stronger freight rates in 2025.”
But FTR said its forecast remains unchanged. “Just like everyone else, we’ll be watching closely to see exactly what trade and other economic policies are implemented and over what time frame. Some freight disruptions are likely due to tariffs and other factors, but it is not yet clear that those actions will do more than shift the timing of activity,” Vise said.
The TCI tracks the changes representing five major conditions in the U.S. truck market: freight volumes, freight rates, fleet capacity, fuel prices, and financing costs. Combined into a single index indicating the industry’s overall health, a positive score represents good, optimistic conditions while a negative score shows the inverse.
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."