Agilent Technologies' "control tower"—an information hub linking the instrument maker with its suppliers to provide inventory visibility—has helped the company deftly model parts availability, manage order promising, and counteract parts shortages during a natural disaster.
James Cooke is a principal analyst with Nucleus Research in Boston, covering supply chain planning software. He was previously the editor of CSCMP?s Supply Chain Quarterly and a staff writer for DC Velocity.
In 2011, when the worst flooding in decades swamped Thailand, many of the manufacturing plants that produce electronic parts and components in that country were forced to suspend operations. That left many of their customers—mostly large international manufacturers—without critical parts needed to fill orders. But not Agilent Technologies Inc. Although Agilent's contract manufacturer in Thailand was out of commission, the testing-equipment maker was able to fill most of the orders that normally would have included items produced by that supplier. That's because Agilent had a resource its competitors didn't have: a "control tower" it had installed a year earlier for its Electronic Measurement Group (EMG).
The control tower is an information hub that links Agilent with its suppliers to provide visibility of the inventory in its supply chain, at both the company's own locations and at the sites of its contract manufacturers and their suppliers. The control tower's staff uses simulation software to model the impact of parts shortages on production and devise a plan to solve any problems. In the case of the Thai floods, the company used that software to rapidly identify shortages so that alternative sources for parts could be quickly found, or in some cases to permit the redesign of parts. "The control tower helps us to be able to capture all components during a shortage so we can come up with risk-mitigation actions," says Michael Tan, Agilent's EMG Supply Chain Operations Director.
Inventory unknowns
Agilent Technologies was created in 1999 when Hewlett-Packard spun off its test and measurement instrument business from its computer business. Headquartered in Santa Clara, California, Agilent Technologies reported US $6.9 billion in revenue in 2012. The Electronic Measurement Group (EMG) is one of four groups within the company, and it's the most profitable one, with US $3.3 billion in revenue in 2012. EMG sells products like oscilloscopes, spectrum analyzers, and network analyzers that are used in such industries as aerospace, defense, communications, and computers. The group has 9,000 customers worldwide. (In September 2013, Agilent Technologies announced plans to make the Electronic Measurement Group a separate, publicly traded company.)
To make 5,000 different types of electronic instruments, EMG works with 1,100 suppliers, 52 percent of which are based in Asia. Although the measurement group operates some of its own factories, it relies on strategic contract manufacturers to make 70 percent of its products. On average EMG ships 70,000 units each month to customers.
Agilent's inbound supply chain spans the globe and requires the coordination of parts flows between its own factories and those of its contract manufacturers. For example, Agilent technology centers in the United States and Germany make integrated circuits. Contract manufacturers in Asia incorporate those components into what Tan refers to as printed-circuit assembly boxes. But Agilent's main manufacturing plant, in Penang, Malaysia, also incorporates the integrated circuits into microcircuit assemblies found in electronic instruments.
All of those factories, both in-house and contract, keep their own inventories of parts to support production. Each plant also has its own suppliers, which keep their own stockpiles of inventory.
The whereabouts and availability of inventory in Agilent's extended global supply chain became a concern in 2009. That's when the economic downturn subsided and business began to pick up again. Cutbacks in production and the demise of some suppliers during the recession had led to parts shortages throughout the electronics industry. As a result, when Agilent needed to ramp up production, it "had some challenges" in locating parts that were in short supply, Tan says.
Compounding the problem was the fact that Agilent needed accurate information about parts availability from its suppliers in order to make delivery commitments to key customers and win business, yet it had no way to get that critical information quickly. One reason was that Agilent, its contract manufacturers, and their suppliers were using different information systems. While Agilent relies on Oracle's technology to keep tabs on production, many of its contract manufacturers and suppliers use enterprise resource planning software from SAP. Because the different information systems in the supply chain were not linked, if Agilent wanted to determine whether it had all the necessary inventory to make an order delivery-time commitment to a customer, it could take three to four weeks to get an answer from all the parties involved.
Simulation saves the day
To solve this problem, Agilent decided to construct a control tower that would give the instrument maker visibility into inventory holdings down to the supplier level in as many nodes in its supply chain as possible. For this vertical supply chain integration project, it bought RapidResponse software from Kinaxis, a vendor of enterprise supply chain software solutions. Besides facilitating supply chain visibility, the software handles demand, supply, and inventory planning as well as what-if analyses, among other functions.
In 2011, Agilent got the control tower up and running with three contract manufacturers and two of its own technology center facilities. Since that time, the control tower's scope has expanded in stages. Currently, it extends to five contract manufacturers and five Agilent-owned sites. Three of the contract manufacturers are in Malaysia, one is in Thailand, and one is in California. Agilent's own facilities linked to the tower include its plants in Penang, Malaysia, and in Santa Clara, California. The tower is also linked to technology centers located in California and Colorado in the United States, and one in Germany.
Staff members who oversee the control tower's operation work out of Agilent's main facility in Penang. There are two teams involved: one conducts the analysis, while the other manages data governance to ensure that all linked locations provide correct, high-quality information.
The suppliers transmit information to the tower on a daily basis. As of this writing, the control tower has visibility of more than 94 percent of all parts used in the EMG supply chain. The tower uses this information to create a complete picture of Agilent's supply chain, which the company employs to manage both daily operations and crisis situations. The information is displayed on computer screens formatted in customized worksheets that show purchase orders, plan, and supply allocation. Tan says the customized worksheets allow Agilent to monitor part-by-part shortages throughout different levels of the supply chain via weekly projected balances based on demand.
The control tower is routinely used to simulate the impact of a major sales event on production. "Our sales engineers want to be able within a half day to come back to a customer and say whether we can support them and get the product in a four-week shipment time," Tan explains.
Whenever a major customer deal is in the offing, the control tower helps Agilent to determine an accurate commitment date for product delivery. It does so by simulating the parts requirements. The simulation allows Agilent to check with its manufacturers and suppliers to determine parts availability, including whether production would encounter any parts shortages. If the simulation reveals possible problems with the availability of components, Agilent can then work with its suppliers to source the part on the open market or obtain it from other distributors. In some cases, the company has re-engineered the product to use an alternative part when the original version was unavailable.
Tan says that the control tower can very quickly predict the revenue impact from any possible deal as well as the company's ability to meet a delivery date before promising it to a customer. "Because of the wide range of products, it was quite a challenge to do this manually in the past within a short time," he says. "The control tower lets you know how much you have on hand and how fast you can get these parts into the factory that produces the product for the final customer."
Since setting up the control tower, Agilent has speeded up its response time for customer order promises. In the past, turnaround time for demand propagation took three to four weeks, as the instrument maker had to contact manufacturers and suppliers involved in a particular order and wait for their responses to determine parts availability for production. Now turnaround time is a week or less.
The control tower also helps Agilent with crisis management, such as when the floods in Thailand affected its contract manufacturer there. The tower simulates the constraints facing a manufacturer or supplier when an unforeseen event disrupts the supply chain. It enables a bottoms-up modeling through the supplier levels to identify the total impact of a disruption on sales orders, forecasts, and safety stock for the various products. It also lets Agilent prioritize the allocation of constrained materials to meet critical demand on the basis of the greatest business benefit. "Because of this tool we are able to quickly simulate gaps [in supply]," said Tan.
As a result of this capability, Agilent was able to minimize disruption for its customers during and after the floods. In some cases it found other sources for parts that it normally would buy from its Thai supplier. In other cases, it redesigned the product or engaged in "value engineering," a technique that involves identifying acceptable substitute parts.
A winning concept
For the control tower to provide inventory visibility, Agilent's supply chain partners must furnish clean, accurate data. The original owner of the data—whether it's Agilent's procurement team or a supplier—is responsible for accuracy and timely updates. "When new products are introduced, the bill of materials needs to be set up correctly at each level," Tan says. "That's why governance is important. Any change needs to be communicated throughout all levels of the supply chain."
Because the control tower needs accurate data for its parts calculations, Tan says, the company must work closely with contract manufacturers and their suppliers. For any data-sharing effort to succeed, he adds, all parties involved must benefit. "It is very important to collaborate to ensure that the data sharing will help [manufacturers and suppliers] as well," he says. "They have to realize that they are linking to systems to let them know their shortages. Then they can see the benefits of linking to the control tower."
Given Agilent's positive experience, would Tan recommend that other companies with complex supply chains consider the use of a control tower to manage inbound supply? He's a firm believer in the concept. For one thing, he says, end-to-end supply chain visibility on a single platform will give companies the ability to manage their supply chains across regions and across time zones. "This will help the company to perform proactive and effective collaboration with suppliers and also enable speed in decision making in the shortest turnaround time," he says. That's key for avoiding unnecessary inventory and expediting costs. But just as importantly, he adds, "it will enable the company to win deals as well as provide customers the best customer experience in terms of delivery responsiveness."
This story first appeared in the Quarter 4/2013 edition of CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly, a journal of thought leadership for the supply chain management profession and a sister publication to AGiLE Business Media's DC Velocity. Readers can obtain a subscription by joining the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (whose membership dues include the Quarterly's subscription fee). Subscriptions are also available to nonmembers for $34.95 (digital) or $89 a year (print). For more information, visit www.SupplyChainQuarterly.com.
Container traffic is finally back to typical levels at the port of Montreal, two months after dockworkers returned to work following a strike, port officials said Thursday.
Today that arbitration continues as the two sides work to forge a new contract. And port leaders with the Maritime Employers Association (MEA) are reminding workers represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) that the CIRB decision “rules out any pressure tactics affecting operations until the next collective agreement expires.”
The Port of Montreal alone said it had to manage a backlog of about 13,350 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) on the ground, as well as 28,000 feet of freight cars headed for export.
Port leaders this week said they had now completed that task. “Two months after operations fully resumed at the Port of Montreal, as directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, the Montreal Port Authority (MPA) is pleased to announce that all port activities are now completely back to normal. Both the impact of the labour dispute and the subsequent resumption of activities required concerted efforts on the part of all port partners to get things back to normal as quickly as possible, even over the holiday season,” the port said in a release.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
The French transportation visibility provider Shippeo today said it has raised $30 million in financial backing, saying the money will support its accelerated expansion across North America and APAC, while driving enhancements to its “Real-Time Transportation Visibility Platform” product.
The funding round was led by Woven Capital, Toyota’s growth fund, with participation from existing investors: Battery Ventures, Partech, NGP Capital, Bpifrance Digital Venture, LFX Venture Partners, Shift4Good and Yamaha Motor Ventures. With this round, Shippeo’s total funding exceeds $140 million.
Shippeo says it offers real-time shipment tracking across all transport modes, helping companies create sustainable, resilient supply chains. Its platform enables users to reduce logistics-related carbon emissions by making informed trade-offs between modes and carriers based on carbon footprint data.
"Global supply chains are facing unprecedented complexity, and real-time transport visibility is essential for building resilience” Prashant Bothra, Principal at Woven Capital, who is joining the Shippeo board, said in a release. “Shippeo’s platform empowers businesses to proactively address disruptions by transforming fragmented operations into streamlined, data-driven processes across all transport modes, offering precise tracking and predictive ETAs at scale—capabilities that would be resource-intensive to develop in-house. We are excited to support Shippeo’s journey to accelerate digitization while enhancing cost efficiency, planning accuracy, and customer experience across the supply chain.”
Donald Trump has been clear that he plans to hit the ground running after his inauguration on January 20, launching ambitious plans that could have significant repercussions for global supply chains.
As Mark Baxa, CSCMP president and CEO, says in the executive forward to the white paper, the incoming Trump Administration and a majority Republican congress are “poised to reshape trade policies, regulatory frameworks, and the very fabric of how we approach global commerce.”
The paper is written by import/export expert Thomas Cook, managing director for Blue Tiger International, a U.S.-based supply chain management consulting company that focuses on international trade. Cook is the former CEO of American River International in New York and Apex Global Logistics Supply Chain Operation in Los Angeles and has written 19 books on global trade.
In the paper, Cook, of course, takes a close look at tariff implications and new trade deals, emphasizing that Trump will seek revisions that will favor U.S. businesses and encourage manufacturing to return to the U.S. The paper, however, also looks beyond global trade to addresses topics such as Trump’s tougher stance on immigration and the possibility of mass deportations, greater support of Israel in the Middle East, proposals for increased energy production and mining, and intent to end the war in the Ukraine.
In general, Cook believes that many of the administration’s new policies will be beneficial to the overall economy. He does warn, however, that some policies will be disruptive and add risk and cost to global supply chains.
In light of those risks and possible disruptions, Cook’s paper offers 14 recommendations. Some of which include:
Create a team responsible for studying the changes Trump will introduce when he takes office;
Attend trade shows and make connections with vendors, suppliers, and service providers who can help you navigate those changes;
Consider becoming C-TPAT (Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism) certified to help mitigate potential import/export issues;
Adopt a risk management mindset and shift from focusing on lowest cost to best value for your spend;
Increase collaboration with internal and external partners;
Expect warehousing costs to rise in the short term as companies look to bring in foreign-made goods ahead of tariffs;
Expect greater scrutiny from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol of origin statements for imports in recognition of attempts by some Chinese manufacturers to evade U.S. import policies;
Reduce dependency on China for sourcing; and
Consider manufacturing and/or sourcing in the United States.
Cook advises readers to expect a loosening up of regulations and a reduction in government under Trump. He warns that while some world leaders will look to work with Trump, others will take more of a defiant stance. As a result, companies should expect to see retaliatory tariffs and duties on exports.
Cook concludes by offering advice to the incoming administration, including being sensitive to the effect retaliatory tariffs can have on American exports, working on federal debt reduction, and considering promoting free trade zones. He also proposes an ambitious water works program through the Army Corps of Engineers.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.