Many of the nation's transportation and logistics business elite have gathered in Palm Beach, Fla., for
investment firm Stifel, Nicolaus & Co.'s annual two-day conference, which starts today. For those seeking
to divine what 2014 holds for those who ship and move stuff, it is hoped the commentary will be as warm as
the near 80-degree weather in the tony South Florida locale.
So far—and even the optimists concede that it's still early—the narrative from top executives indicates
that 2014 is shaping up to be a decent year, though hardly a memorable one. Investment firm Morgan Stanley & Co.
recently sifted through press releases and transcripts of conference calls between management and analysts over the
past two years to compare 2014 outlooks with the prior year. The takeaway, according to lead transport analyst William
Greene, is that freight executives "feel better about the 2014 outlook" compared with their mood when surveying the
2013 landscape at the start of last year.
In a Feb. 3 research note, Greene extracted comments made so far this year by top executives of many leading
publicly held companies as they discussed 2013 fourth quarter and full-year results. Executives of Omaha, Neb.-based
truckload carrier Werner Transport Inc. said that, "freight trends thus far in 2014 have been better than the same
period in 2013." Leaders at Norfolk, Va.-based rail giant Norfolk Southern Corp. said that while "we were less sure
about the economy" during the first half of 2013, "we felt better about a lot of our business segments" as the year
progressed. Fort Smith, Ark.-based less-than-truckload carrier (LTL) ABF Freight System Inc. said the company had
"better conversations" with its customers over business conditions as it finalized contracts during December.
Executives at Atlanta-based UPS Inc. cited economists' projections of stronger U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) growth,
modest 1- to 2-percent growth in the Eurozone after a flat 2013, and China's economy expanding in line with 2013 results at
around 7.5 percent. "More importantly, global exports are projected to slightly outpace global GDP," said UPS, whose fortunes,
more than most U.S.-based transportation firms, are tied to the global economy.
On rates, most executives said they were seeing a firming not visible for some time. Jacksonville, Fla.-based Landstar
System Inc., a trucking firm that operates through a network of agents, said revenue per load in December rose 3.1 percent
over December 2012. That was the first month all year where that critical metric came in higher than in a comparable month
of 2012, Landstar said. Kansas City-based rail holding company Kansas City Southern said that the pricing environment is
"still positive" and that its rates will rise faster than the projected overall inflation rate, which was reported by the
government at 1.5 percent for 2013.
LTL carrier Saia Inc., based in Johns Creek, Ga., said the rate environment remains "pretty good," though it saw stronger
years for rate increases in 2012 and 2011. Oak Brook, Ill.-based Hub Group Inc., the nation's largest intermodal marketing
firm, was one of the few firms that reported a tough pricing environment; efforts in general to hike intermodal rates have
been muted by increases in capacity to meet growing demand for the service.
Not everyone is that upbeat about the outlook. John G. Larkin, Baltimore-based Stifel's lead transportation analyst, said
freight growth will be suppressed by increases in supply chain efficiencies that better calibrate supply and demand and minimize
the risk of over-production. An aging U.S. population that will spend more on services than on goods will depress economic and
freight growth, as will a dearth of investment in freight-related infrastructure, according to Larkin.
The positive trends will be found mostly in international markets, Larkin said. Cross-border volumes in the U.S.-Mexican
trades will continue to increase, he said. In addition, U.S. exports will come close to balance with U.S. imports due to the
emergence of middle classes in developing countries and the rising global competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing, Larkin said.
The analyst expects industry consolidation to continue as asset-based providers increasingly take share from nonasset-based
rivals.
Roslyn Wilson, who authors the influential "State of Logistics Report," which is published annually, said she is cautiously
optimistic about 2014. Wilson said early data points paint a mixed picture of economic and freight activity. The Institute for
Supply Management's index of new orders for January was off more than 13 percent over December, hardly a positive sign although
the numbers may have been skewed by bad weather and a pull-forward of orders into December. Inventory levels have been elevated
for some time, also not a positive sign as companies will want to work off existing supply before placing new orders, Wilson said.
On the positive side, growth in personal consumption and in residential and nonresidential fixed investment bode well for freight
volumes, she said.
Wilson, who is now gathering data for the report to be released in June, said, "the things we look for that translate into more
supply chain business are not sparking yet." However, perhaps mindful of her generally pessimistic stance on the economy and the
industry since the 2009 recession, she added that, "I am more positive than negative for 2014."
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."