Mark Solomon joined DC VELOCITY as senior editor in August 2008, and was promoted to his current position on January 1, 2015. He has spent more than 30 years in the transportation, logistics and supply chain management fields as a journalist and public relations professional. From 1989 to 1994, he worked in Washington as a reporter for the Journal of Commerce, covering the aviation and trucking industries, the Department of Transportation, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to that, he worked for Traffic World for seven years in a similar role. From 1994 to 2008, Mr. Solomon ran Media-Based Solutions, a public relations firm based in Atlanta. He graduated in 1978 with a B.A. in journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
In an episode of the TV series "Mad Men," a chronicle of the 1960s New York advertising world through the eyes of a fictitious agency, the daughter of one of the partners pleads with him to invest in a wondrous idea called "refrigerated transportation." Imagine a world, she tells him in early 1968, where fresh and frozen foods can be transported door to door by trucks over thousands of miles without spoiling.
If ever in this business there were a case of art imitating life, this is it. With the advent of superior refrigeration systems and more powerful and efficient diesel engines, long-haul refrigerated, or reefer, trucking took off in the early 1970s. It created new choices for consumers, new markets for shippers, and a new industry—and virtual monopoly—for carriers. It has been that way for nearly a half century.
But the last few years have shown that railroads are more than willing to jump into the truckers' traditional sandbox. The rails, knowing truck shippers are concerned about volatile fuel costs, increased regulatory pressure, and capacity availability, among other things, have aggressively pushed into domestic intermodal services; this has resulted in the conversion of millions of trailers from the highways to the tracks. In the past year or so, rails have shortened their intermodal lengths of haul, encroaching even further into what has been truckers' sovereign territory.
Now, rails are eyeing a bigger slice of transport's cold chain, a business they've been involved in for years, albeit in a modest way. By using rail intermodal for most of the total move, operators are looking to underprice end-to-end truck transport by 10 to 15 percent on produce shipments moving from farm to market. How well the rails and their partners execute could, over time, reshape a market still controlled by truck; by some estimates, only 2 percent of U.S. long-haul produce traffic moves via intermodal.
Sometime in May, a service will launch that its backers said will put a new spin on the reefer transport tale. Dubbed "TransCold Express," the service calls for BNSF Railway to operate dedicated weekly trains linking specially designed "food parks" in Wilmington, Ill., about 60 miles southwest of Chicago, with Selma, Calif., a town 20 miles south of Fresno that's known as the world's "raisin capital." Heading west, a BNSF train will pull refrigerated and frozen food products such as meats and cheeses in 50 72-foot specialized boxcars, each one capable of holding the equivalent of four trailerloads of palletized cargo. Coming east, another BNSF train of identical size will carry produce shipments from California's Central Valley to the Midwest. Each train will initially operate on Wednesday and take four days to traverse the 2,220 miles between hubs.
A DIFFERENT DRUMMER
A key distinction between this and traditional intermodal services is that it will operate as a rail-truck hybrid instead of incorporating a wider-reaching dray, according to Randy McKay, CEO of McKay TransCold, an Edina, Minn.-based company largely responsible for developing the project. In a typical intermodal move, truck draymen move goods to and from the rail ramps. However, dray equipment covers only about 200 miles before drivers must return to origin, McKay said. With the new service, drivers can drop off loads at destination, pick up another load, and head off without returning to base, he said. McKay said the service will increase supply chain coverage and flexibility beyond what is available through today's intermodal offerings.
"By loading four truckloads of cargo onto one boxcar and then cross-docking those goods to standard reefer trailers, we can run those trucks as if they are regular refrigerated trucks," McKay said in an e-mail to DC Velocity. "They don't need to deadhead back to our yard."
From the Selma railhead, for example, trucks will carry goods as far south as San Diego and as far north as the Bay Area, McKay said. There are no plans to extend service into the Pacific Northwest, McKay said.
Eastbound, goods can be trucked up to 500 miles to points in the Midwest and into the East and South, he said.
About half of the fleet will consist of dedicated contract carriage, with the remainder coming from the spot market, McKay said. He declined to identify the name of the fleet contractor. Private fleets operated by beneficial cargo owners may also be involved, meaning a retailer's trucks can meet the freight at the intermodal hub instead of having McKay's trucks deliver the loads to the retailer's door.
The Wilmington distribution hub, known as RidgePort, is being developed by Ridge Property Trust, a Chicago-based private real estate investment trust (REIT). Van-G Logistics, located in Fowler, Calif., 11 miles from Fresno, will run the Selma facility. McKay said the goal is to offer a full-service operation at both facilities.
LONG LEADTIME
McKay said in mid-January that several anchor customers were "ready to sign contracts," but that the company wanted to wait until the launch date grew nearer before it committed.
There are risks that will remain once the service starts. Volume density is critical to the success of any bidirectional operation. Yet there has always been a pronounced directional imbalance favoring goods from the West Coast. McKay executives acknowledge they will have to make a strong sales push on the westbound leg to narrow the gap.
Though a multitude of produce comes out of California's verdant Central Valley, the pipeline generally runs dry for about two months out of the year. McKay executives said they hope to pick up the slack by booking other types of temperature-sensitive goods.
C. Thomas Barnes, president of Con-way Multimodal, a mode-agnostic unit of trucking and logistics giant Con-way Inc., said the nascent service will get a boost by using BNSF's Los Angeles-Chicago lane. Barnes said the trains on the corridor run "like clockwork" with rapid velocity and short dwell times, both important attributes in hauling perishables. Truckers involved in the operation should also gain efficiencies through better equipment utilization, a result of driving longer distances than the typical dray, he said.
Barnes said the key would be the speed at which cargo is transloaded at destination from the boxcars to the trailers. Transloading can be time-consuming and labor-intensive, adding to the cost and risk of product spoilage, he said.
The McKay service is not the only rail initiative slated to start this year that focuses on the produce market. Also this spring, a company called Tiger Cool Express LLC, founded by intermodal veterans Ted Prince, Tom Finkbiner, and Tom Shurstad, is expected to get rolling. Like McKay TransCold, the Tiger Cool folks spent several years trying to get growers, retailers, railroads, and financiers seriously interested in a service that, up until now, has been off the beaten path.
Little wonder. Trucks come with higher costs relative to rail. However, trucks promise faster, direct transit times and fewer hand-offs, must-haves for perishables shippers and their customers. As such, no one expects the produce business to radically flip to intermodal or boxcar any time soon.
McKay said his goal is not necessarily to take share from truckers but to offer an interesting alternative to stakeholders in the reefer supply chain. Those stakeholders, he said, include truckers.
The service is designed to "give trucking companies, shippers, and others options with added service offerings," he said.
Congestion on U.S. highways is costing the trucking industry big, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
The group found that traffic congestion on U.S. highways added $108.8 billion in costs to the trucking industry in 2022, a record high. The information comes from ATRI’s Cost of Congestion study, which is part of the organization’s ongoing highway performance measurement research.
Total hours of congestion fell slightly compared to 2021 due to softening freight market conditions, but the cost of operating a truck increased at a much higher rate, according to the research. As a result, the overall cost of congestion increased by 15% year-over-year—a level equivalent to more than 430,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for one work year and an average cost of $7,588 for every registered combination truck.
The analysis also identified metropolitan delays and related impacts, showing that the top 10 most-congested states each experienced added costs of more than $8 billion. That list was led by Texas, at $9.17 billion in added costs; California, at $8.77 billion; and Florida, $8.44 billion. Rounding out the top 10 list were New York, Georgia, New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Tennessee. Combined, the top 10 states account for more than half of the trucking industry’s congestion costs nationwide—52%, according to the research.
The metro areas with the highest congestion costs include New York City, $6.68 billion; Miami, $3.2 billion; and Chicago, $3.14 billion.
ATRI’s analysis also found that the trucking industry wasted more than 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel in 2022 due to congestion, resulting in additional fuel costs of $32.1 billion.
ATRI used a combination of data sources, including its truck GPS database and Operational Costs study benchmarks, to calculate the impacts of trucking delays on major U.S. roadways.
There’s a photo from 1971 that John Kent, professor of supply chain management at the University of Arkansas, likes to show. It’s of a shaggy-haired 18-year-old named Glenn Cowan grinning at three-time world table tennis champion Zhuang Zedong, while holding a silk tapestry Zhuang had just given him. Cowan was a member of the U.S. table tennis team who participated in the 1971 World Table Tennis Championships in Nagoya, Japan. Story has it that one morning, he overslept and missed his bus to the tournament and had to hitch a ride with the Chinese national team and met and connected with Zhuang.
Cowan and Zhuang’s interaction led to an invitation for the U.S. team to visit China. At the time, the two countries were just beginning to emerge from a 20-year period of decidedly frosty relations, strict travel bans, and trade restrictions. The highly publicized trip signaled a willingness on both sides to renew relations and launched the term “pingpong diplomacy.”
Kent, who is a senior fellow at the George H. W. Bush Foundation for U.S.-China Relations, believes the photograph is a good reminder that some 50-odd years ago, the economies of the United States and China were not as tightly interwoven as they are today. At the time, the Nixon administration was looking to form closer political and economic ties between the two countries in hopes of reducing chances of future conflict (and to weaken alliances among Communist countries).
The signals coming out of Washington and Beijing are now, of course, much different than they were in the early 1970s. Instead of advocating for better relations, political rhetoric focuses on the need for the U.S. to “decouple” from China. Both Republicans and Democrats have warned that the U.S. economy is too dependent on goods manufactured in China. They see this dependency as a threat to economic strength, American jobs, supply chain resiliency, and national security.
Supply chain professionals, however, know that extricating ourselves from our reliance on Chinese manufacturing is easier said than done. Many pundits push for a “China + 1” strategy, where companies diversify their manufacturing and sourcing options beyond China. But in reality, that “plus one” is often a Chinese company operating in a different country or a non-Chinese manufacturer that is still heavily dependent on material or subcomponents made in China.
This is the problem when supply chain decisions are made on a global scale without input from supply chain professionals. In an article in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Kent argues that, “The discussions on supply chains mainly take place between government officials who typically bring many other competing issues and agendas to the table. Corporate entities—the individuals and companies directly impacted by supply chains—tend to be under-represented in the conversation.”
Kent is a proponent of what he calls “supply chain diplomacy,” where experts from academia and industry from the U.S. and China work collaboratively to create better, more efficient global supply chains. Take, for example, the “Peace Beans” project that Kent is involved with. This project, jointly formed by Zhejiang University and the Bush China Foundation, proposes balancing supply chains by exporting soybeans from Arkansas to tofu producers in China’s Yunnan province, and, in return, importing coffee beans grown in Yunnan to coffee roasters in Arkansas. Kent believes the operation could even use the same transportation equipment.
The benefits of working collaboratively—instead of continuing to build friction in the supply chain through tariffs and adversarial relationships—are numerous, according to Kent and his colleagues. They believe it would be much better if the two major world economies worked together on issues like global inflation, climate change, and artificial intelligence.
And such relations could play a significant role in strengthening world peace, particularly in light of ongoing tensions over Taiwan. Because, as Kent writes, “The 19th-century idea that ‘When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will’ is as true today as ever. Perhaps more so.”
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling today announced its plans to fulfill the domestic manufacturing requirements of the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act for certain portions of its lineup of forklift trucks and container handling equipment.
That means the Greenville, North Carolina-based company now plans to expand its existing American manufacturing with a targeted set of high-capacity models, including electric options, that align with the needs of infrastructure projects subject to BABA requirements. The company’s plans include determining the optimal production location in the United States, strategically expanding sourcing agreements to meet local material requirements, and further developing electric power options for high-capacity equipment.
As a part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the BABA Act aims to increase the use of American-made materials in federally funded infrastructure projects across the U.S., Hyster-Yale says. It was enacted as part of a broader effort to boost domestic manufacturing and economic growth, and mandates that federal dollars allocated to infrastructure – such as roads, bridges, ports and public transit systems – must prioritize materials produced in the USA, including critical items like steel, iron and various construction materials.
Hyster-Yale’s footprint in the U.S. is spread across 10 locations, including three manufacturing facilities.
“Our leadership is fully invested in meeting the needs of businesses that require BABA-compliant material handling solutions,” Tony Salgado, Hyster-Yale’s chief operating officer, said in a release. “We are working to partner with our key domestic suppliers, as well as identifying how best to leverage our own American manufacturing footprint to deliver a competitive solution for our customers and stakeholders. But beyond mere compliance, and in line with the many areas of our business where we are evolving to better support our customers, our commitment remains steadfast. We are dedicated to delivering industry-leading standards in design, durability and performance — qualities that have become synonymous with our brands worldwide and that our customers have come to rely on and expect.”
In a separate move, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also gave its approval for the state to advance its Heavy-Duty Omnibus Rule, which is crafted to significantly reduce smog-forming nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from new heavy-duty, diesel-powered trucks.
Both rules are intended to deliver health benefits to California citizens affected by vehicle pollution, according to the environmental group Earthjustice. If the state gets federal approval for the final steps to become law, the rules mean that cars on the road in California will largely be zero-emissions a generation from now in the 2050s, accounting for the average vehicle lifespan of vehicles with internal combustion engine (ICE) power sold before that 2035 date.
“This might read like checking a bureaucratic box, but EPA’s approval is a critical step forward in protecting our lungs from pollution and our wallets from the expenses of combustion fuels,” Paul Cort, director of Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a release. “The gradual shift in car sales to zero-emissions models will cut smog and household costs while growing California’s clean energy workforce. Cutting truck pollution will help clear our skies of smog. EPA should now approve the remaining authorization requests from California to allow the state to clean its air and protect its residents.”
However, the truck drivers' industry group Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) pushed back against the federal decision allowing the Omnibus Low-NOx rule to advance. "The Omnibus Low-NOx waiver for California calls into question the policymaking process under the Biden administration's EPA. Purposefully injecting uncertainty into a $588 billion American industry is bad for our economy and makes no meaningful progress towards purported environmental goals," (OOIDA) President Todd Spencer said in a release. "EPA's credibility outside of radical environmental circles would have been better served by working with regulated industries rather than ramming through last-minute special interest favors. We look forward to working with the Trump administration's EPA in good faith towards achievable environmental outcomes.”
Editor's note:This article was revised on December 18 to add reaction from OOIDA.
A Canadian startup that provides AI-powered logistics solutions has gained $5.5 million in seed funding to support its concept of creating a digital platform for global trade, according to Toronto-based Starboard.
The round was led by Eclipse, with participation from previous backers Garuda Ventures and Everywhere Ventures. The firm says it will use its new backing to expand its engineering team in Toronto and accelerate its AI-driven product development to simplify supply chain complexities.
According to Starboard, the logistics industry is under immense pressure to adapt to the growing complexity of global trade, which has hit recent hurdles such as the strike at U.S. east and gulf coast ports. That situation calls for innovative solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs for operators.
As a potential solution, Starboard offers its flagship product, which it defines as an AI-based transportation management system (TMS) and rate management system that helps mid-sized freight forwarders operate more efficiently and win more business. More broadly, Starboard says it is building the virtual infrastructure for global trade, allowing freight companies to leverage AI and machine learning to optimize operations such as processing shipments in real time, reconciling invoices, and following up on payments.
"This investment is a pivotal step in our mission to unlock the power of AI for our customers," said Sumeet Trehan, Co-Founder and CEO of Starboard. "Global trade has long been plagued by inefficiencies that drive up costs and reduce competitiveness. Our platform is designed to empower SMB freight forwarders—the backbone of more than $20 trillion in global trade and $1 trillion in logistics spend—with the tools they need to thrive in this complex ecosystem."